Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Tenotomy versus Subpectoral Tenodesis in Rotator Cuff Repair

Backgroud Lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) are one of the most common pathologies in patients with a rotator cuff tear. Although various procedures have been shown to be effective for treating LHBT lesions during rotator cuff repair, no consensus has been reached regarding the most effective treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of tenotomy vs subpectoral tenodesis of the LHBT in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods The records of 135 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with biceps tenotomy or subpectoral tenodesis for a partial LHBT tear of > 50% were initially reviewed. Finally, 77 patients (38 patients with tenotomy and 39 patients with subpectoral tenodesis) with an intact rotator cuff, who underwent a functional evaluation at 1 year postoperatively, were enrolled in this retrospective study. Results The average follow-up was 13.3 ± 4.36 months (13.2 ± 1.4 months in the tenotomy group and 13.6 ± 2.7 months in the subpectoral tenodesis group; p = 0.416). Demographic and surgical data were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Preoperatively, biceps groove tenderness, Speed's test, and Yergason test results were positive in 27.3%, 27.3%, and 10.4% of the study subjects, respectively. Compared with preoperative values, all functional scores including shoulder muscle power were significantly improved postoperatively, and no significant intergroup difference was observed (all p > 0.05). A visible Popeye deformity was not encountered in either group at the final follow-up. Eight patients in the tenotomy group and 7 patients in the subpectoral tenodesis group complained of mild anterior shoulder pain (p = 0.731), and 4 patients in each group complained of groove tenderness (p = 0.969). No surgical or postoperative complication occurred in either group. Conclusions Both biceps tenotomy and subpectoral tenodesis performed during rotator cuff repair improved pain and function and resulted in comparable clinical outcomes. Residual symptoms associated with the remnant LHBT in the groove may not be a problem after adhesion of LHBT.

[1]  Christopher L. McCrum,et al.  Complications of biceps tenodesis based on location, fixation, and indication: a review of 1526 shoulders. , 2019, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[2]  J. Oh,et al.  Treatment Strategy for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears , 2018, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[3]  Samuel A. Taylor,et al.  Long Head of Biceps Tendon Management: a Survey of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons , 2018, HSS Journal ®.

[4]  S. Desai,et al.  Long Head of Biceps Tendon Pathology and Results of Tenotomy in Full-Thickness Reparable Rotator Cuff Tear. , 2017, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[5]  J. Yoo,et al.  Arthroscopic Evaluation of Subluxation of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon and Its Relationship with Subscapularis Tears , 2017, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[6]  J. Katz,et al.  The Diagnostic Accuracy of Special Tests for Rotator Cuff Tear: The ROW Cohort Study , 2017, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[7]  Ho Jin Jung,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Interference Screw and Suture Anchor Techniques for Biceps Tenodesis , 2017, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  N. Orlando,et al.  Tenodesis is not superior to tenotomy in the treatment of the long head of biceps tendon lesions , 2017, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  B. Reyes,et al.  A Review of Recent Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment Modalities for Long Head of Bicep Tendinopathy , 2016 .

[10]  Ji-Young Jeong,et al.  Surgical treatment of lesions of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon with rotator cuff tear: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the clinical results of tenotomy and tenodesis. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[11]  Ji Soon Park,et al.  Comparison of Treatments for Superior Labrum-Biceps Complex Lesions With Concomitant Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Analysis of Debridement, Biceps Tenotomy, and Biceps Tenodesis. , 2016, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[12]  Y. Yi,et al.  Arthroscopic proximal versus open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with arthroscopic repair of small- or medium-sized rotator cuff tears , 2016, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[13]  Y. Rhee,et al.  “Hidden Lesions” of the Extra-articular Biceps After Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis: Response , 2015, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  E. McCarty,et al.  Biceps Tenotomy Versus Tenodesis in Active Patients Younger Than 55 Years , 2015, Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.

[15]  Y. Rhee,et al.  Analysis of “Hidden Lesions” of the Extra-articular Biceps After Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis , 2015, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  Bryan T. Hanypsiak,et al.  Anatomy of the biceps tendon: implications for restoring physiological length-tension relation during biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation. , 2012, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[17]  Tal S. David,et al.  Arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis of the long head biceps: reproducing an anatomic length-tension relationship. , 2012, Arthroscopy Techniques.

[18]  J. Oh,et al.  Biomechanical and histological analysis after tenotomy of the long head of the biceps in the rabbit shoulder model , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  R. Queen,et al.  Isokinetic Strength, Endurance, and Subjective Outcomes After Biceps Tenotomy Versus Tenodesis , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[20]  J. Yoo,et al.  Patient-Related Factors and Complications After Arthroscopic Tenotomy of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[21]  Paul B. Lewis,et al.  Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanical results. , 2011, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[22]  M. Provencher,et al.  Long Head of the Biceps Tendinopathy: Diagnosis and Management , 2010, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[23]  A. Romeo,et al.  Management of Failed Biceps Tenodesis or Tenotomy: Causation and Treatment , 2010, Sports medicine and arthroscopy review.

[24]  P. Millett,et al.  Interference Screw vs. Suture Anchor Fixation for Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis: Does it Matter? , 2008, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[25]  B. Jost,et al.  Anterior and posterior instability of the long head of the biceps tendon in rotator cuff tears: a new classification based on arthroscopic observations. , 2007, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[26]  L. Lafosse,et al.  A new technique to improve tissue grip: "the lasso-loop stitch". , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[27]  Edward C. Jones,et al.  Measurement of Shoulder Activity Level , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  C. Shih,et al.  Incidence and severity of biceps long head tendon lesion in patients with complete rotator cuff tears. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[29]  Samuel A. Taylor,et al.  Arthroscopic Release of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon , 2005, The American journal of sports medicine.

[30]  P. Habermeyer,et al.  Anterosuperior impingement of the shoulder as a result of pulley lesions: a prospective arthroscopic study. , 2004, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.