Time-location analysis for exposure assessment studies of children using a novel global positioning system instrument.

Global positioning system (GPS) technology is used widely for business and leisure activities and offers promise for human time-location studies to evaluate potential exposure to environmental contaminants. In this article we describe the development of a novel GPS instrument suitable for tracking the movements of young children. Eleven children in the Seattle area (2-8 years old) wore custom-designed data-logging GPS units integrated into clothing. Location data were transferred into geographic information systems software for map overlay, visualization, and tabular analysis. Data were grouped into five location categories (in vehicle, inside house, inside school, inside business, and outside) to determine time spent and percentage reception in each location. Additional experiments focused on spatial resolution, reception efficiency in typical environments, and sources of signal interference. Significant signal interference occurred only inside concrete/steel-frame buildings and inside a power substation. The GPS instruments provided adequate spatial resolution (typically about 2-3 m outdoors and 4-5 m indoors) to locate subjects within distinct microenvironments and distinguish a variety of human activities. Reception experiments showed that location could be tracked outside, proximal to buildings, and inside some buildings. Specific location information could identify movement in a single room inside a home, on a playground, or along a fence line. The instrument, worn in a vest or in bib overalls, was accepted by children and parents. Durability of the wiring was improved early in the study to correct breakage problems. The use of GPS technology offers a new level of accuracy for direct quantification of time-location activity patterns in exposure assessment studies.

[1]  R. Lynch,et al.  Use of global positioning system technology to track subject's location during environmental exposure sampling , 2001, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[2]  Domingos S.L. Soares Time is Life , 2001 .

[3]  R. Fenske,et al.  Biological monitoring of organophosphorus pesticide exposure among children of agricultural workers in central Washington State. , 1997, Environmental health perspectives.

[4]  W C Holton Farming from a new perspective: remote sensing comes down to earth. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  V G Zartarian,et al.  Children's exposure assessment: a review of factors influencing Children's exposure, and the data available to characterize and assess that exposure. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[6]  JOHN P ROBINSON,et al.  Measuring potential exposure to environmental pollutants: time spent with soil and time spent outdoors , 2000, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[7]  Wayne R. Ott,et al.  Total human exposure , 1985 .

[8]  Lance Wallace,et al.  The TEAM Study: Personal Exposures to Toxic Substances in Air, Drinking Water, and Breath of 400 Residents of , 1987 .

[9]  Richard A Fenske,et al.  Temporal association of children's pesticide exposure and agricultural spraying: report of a longitudinal biological monitoring study. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  V G Zartarian,et al.  A pilot study to collect micro-activity data of two- to four-year-old farm labor children in Salinas Valley, California. , 1995, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[11]  J M Waldman,et al.  A portable datalogger to evaluate recall-based time-use measures. , 1993, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[12]  Y Schutz,et al.  Could a satellite-based navigation system (GPS) be used to assess the physical activity of individuals on earth? , 1997, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[13]  PAUL J LIOY,et al.  Responses to the Region 5 NHEXAS time/activity diary , 1999, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[14]  C Sparacino,et al.  The TEAM (Total Exposure Assessment Methodology) Study: personal exposures to toxic substances in air, drinking water, and breath of 400 residents of New Jersey, North Carolina, and North Dakota. , 1987, Environmental research.

[15]  P J Lioy,et al.  Design and evaluation of a location and activity log used for assessing personal exposure to air pollutants. , 1991, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[16]  PAUL J LIOY,et al.  Quantification of children's hand and mouthing activities through a videotaping methodology , 1999, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[17]  Ryan S. Miller,et al.  Identifying populations potentially exposed to agricultural pesticides using remote sensing and a Geographic Information System. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[18]  L. Jack Lyon,et al.  Tracking elk hunters with the global positioning system. , 1998 .

[19]  Buyer's Guide. , 1968, Hospital topics.

[20]  R. Fenske,et al.  Pesticides in household dust and soil: exposure pathways for children of agricultural families. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[21]  R A Fenske,et al.  Pesticide exposure of children in an agricultural community: evidence of household proximity to farmland and take home exposure pathways. , 2000, Environmental research.

[22]  K. Olden,et al.  Children's health: a mixed review. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  D J Moschandreas,et al.  The shadow sensor: an electronic activity pattern sensor. , 1991, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[24]  D. Westerdahl,et al.  The Los Angeles TEAM Study: personal exposures, indoor-outdoor air concentrations, and breath concentrations of 25 volatile organic compounds. , 1991, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.