Vestibular suppression during space flight.

Normal movements performed while voluntarily fixing the head to the torso can lead to motion sickness in susceptible individuals. The underlying mechanism may involve excessive suppression of vestibular responses. A similar motor strategy is often adopted in the early days of a space flight and might contribute to the development of space motion sickness. In a recent experiment, we monitored the eye, head and upper torso rotations of four Life and Microgravity Spacelab crew members. For the purposes of this study, all data were excluded except for periods during which the subject was performing pure yaw-axis head movements. All subjects showed a significant increase in gaze slip on the first day of their mission, suggesting that increased vestibular suppression was occurring. Furthermore, this amount of increased suppression would have been more than adequate to produce motion sickness in susceptible individuals on the ground. The results support the theory of two, independent mechanisms for space motion sickness.

[1]  D F Stewart,et al.  Space motion sickness during 24 flights of the space shuttle. , 1988, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[2]  H I CHINN,et al.  Motion sickness. , 1992, Pharmacological reviews.

[3]  L. Bouyer,et al.  "Torso rotation" experiments; 2: Gaze stability during voluntary head movements improves with adaptation to motion sickness. , 1996, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[4]  L. Bouyer,et al.  "Torso rotation" experiments; 3: Effects of acute changes in vestibular function on the control of voluntary head movements. , 1996, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[5]  J T Reason,et al.  Motion Sickness Adaptation: A Neural Mismatch Model 1 , 1978, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[6]  W. Precht Neuronal Operations in the Vestibular System , 1978, Studies of Brain Function.

[7]  J. M. Lentz Laboratory Tests of Motion Sickness Susceptibility , 1984 .

[8]  D. Robinson,et al.  Voluntary, non-visual control of the human vestibulo-ocular reflex. , 1976, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[9]  Charles M. Oman,et al.  Space motion sickness monitoring experiment - Spacelab 1 , 1984 .

[10]  T Vilis,et al.  A reexamination of the gain of the vestibuloocular reflex. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  G. D. Paige,et al.  The influence of target distance on eye movement responses during vertical linear motion , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  D G Watt,et al.  The vestibulo-ocular reflex and its possible roles in space motion sickness. , 1987, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[13]  D. Robinson,et al.  Adaptation of the human vestibuloocular reflex to magnifying lenses , 1975, Brain Research.

[14]  J P Bagian,et al.  Treatment efficacy of intramuscular promethazine for space motion sickness. , 1993, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[15]  A. J. Benson Modification of the Response to Angular Accelerations by Linear Accelerations , 1974 .

[16]  D G Watt,et al.  "Torso rotation" experiments; 1: Adaptation to motion sickness does not correlate with changes in VOR gain. , 1996, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.