论文信息 - Why Did Two Theoretically Equivalent Methods Produce Two Very Different Values

Why Did Two Theoretically Equivalent Methods Produce Two Very Different Values

In 1991 a team from the Universities of Newcastle and York conducted a study that set out to estimate the value of preventing non-fatal road traffic injuries. The research was commissioned by the Department of Transport (DoT) and the Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) to put the valuation of preventing such injuries on the same willingness-to-pay footing as the figure used to value the prevention of road fatalities.

[1] G. Loewenstein,et al. Individual Utilities Are Inconsistent with Rationing Choices , 1996, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[2] J. Payne,et al. How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation , 1994 .

[3] A. Tversky,et al. Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[4] Robin Gregory,et al. Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach , 1993 .

[5] A. Tversky,et al. Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[6] B. Fischhoff,et al. Value elicitation: Is there anything in there? , 1991 .

[7] Daniel Kahneman,et al. Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .