Addressing parameter identifiability by model-based experimentation.

Mathematical description of biological processes such as gene regulatory networks or signalling pathways by dynamic models utilising ordinary differential equations faces challenges if the model parameters like rate constants are estimated from incomplete and noisy experimental data. Typically, biological networks are only partially observed. Only a fraction of the modelled molecular species is measurable directly. This can result in structurally non-identifiable model parameters. Furthermore, practical non-identifiability can arise from limited amount and quality of experimental data. In the challenge of growing model complexity on one side, and experimental limitations on the other side, both types of non-identifiability arise frequently in systems biological applications often prohibiting reliable prediction of system dynamics. On theoretical grounds this article summarises how and why both types of non-identifiability arise. It exemplifies pitfalls where models do not yield reliable predictions of system dynamics because of non-identifiabilities. Subsequently, several approaches for identifiability analysis proposed in the literature are discussed. The aim is to provide an overview of applicable methods for detecting parameter identifiability issues. Once non-identifiability is detected, it can be resolved either by experimental design, measuring additional data under suitable conditions; or by model reduction, tailoring the size of the model to the information content provided by the experimental data. Both strategies enhance model predictability and will be elucidated by an example application. [Includes supplementary material].

[1]  E. L. Lehmann,et al.  Theory of point estimation , 1950 .

[2]  H. Pohjanpalo System identifiability based on the power series expansion of the solution , 1978 .

[3]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Parameter and structural identifiability concepts and ambiguities: a critical review and analysis. , 1980, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  J. Jacquez,et al.  Numerical parameter identifiability and estimability: Integrating identifiability, estimability, and optimal sampling design , 1985 .

[5]  Eric Walter,et al.  Identifiability of parametric models , 1987 .

[6]  Yves Lecourtier,et al.  VOLTERRA AND GENERATING POWER SERIES APPROACHES TO IDENTIFIABILITY TESTING , 1987 .

[7]  S. Moolgavkar,et al.  A Method for Computing Profile-Likelihood- Based Confidence Intervals , 1988 .

[8]  Eric Walter,et al.  QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE IDENTIFIABILITY ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR CHEMICAL KINETIC MODELS , 1989 .

[9]  H. Rabitz,et al.  Similarity transformation approach to identifiability analysis of nonlinear compartmental models. , 1989, Mathematical biosciences.

[10]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: FORTRAN , 1988 .

[11]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  On global identifiability for arbitrary model parametrizations , 1994, Autom..

[12]  Luis A. Escobar,et al.  Teaching about Approximate Confidence Regions Based on Maximum Likelihood Estimation , 1995 .

[13]  R. Heinrich,et al.  The Regulation of Cellular Systems , 1996, Springer US.

[14]  Michael C. Neale,et al.  The Use of Likelihood-Based Confidence Intervals in Genetic Models , 1997, Behavior genetics.

[15]  .. W. V. Der,et al.  On Profile Likelihood , 2000 .

[16]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Global identifiability of linear compartmental models-a computer algebra algorithm , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Brahim Sadik,et al.  A Bound for the Order of Characteristic Set Elements of an Ordinary Prime Differential Ideal and some Applications , 2000, Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing.

[18]  K R Godfrey,et al.  The structural identifiability and parameter estimation of a multispecies model for the transmission of mastitis in dairy cows. , 2001, Mathematical biosciences.

[19]  Alexandre Sedoglavic A probabilistic algorithm to test local algebraic observability in polynomial time , 2001, ISSAC '01.

[20]  H P Wynn,et al.  Differential algebra methods for the study of the structural identifiability of rational function state-space models in the biosciences. , 2001, Mathematical biosciences.

[21]  H. Kitano Systems Biology: A Brief Overview , 2002, Science.

[22]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Systems biology , 2003 .

[23]  Maria Pia Saccomani,et al.  Parameter identifiability of nonlinear systems: the role of initial conditions , 2003, Autom..

[24]  David W. Bacon,et al.  Modeling Ethylene/Butene Copolymerization with Multi‐site Catalysts: Parameter Estimability and Experimental Design , 2003 .

[25]  J. Timmer,et al.  Identification of nucleocytoplasmic cycling as a remote sensor in cellular signaling by databased modeling , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Ralf Takors,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for the reduction of complex metabolism models , 2004 .

[27]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Optimal sampling time selection for parameter estimation in dynamic pathway modeling. , 2004, Bio Systems.

[28]  Carol S. Woodward,et al.  Enabling New Flexibility in the SUNDIALS Suite of Nonlinear and Differential/Algebraic Equation Solvers , 2020, ACM Trans. Math. Softw..

[29]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Linking data to models: data regression , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[30]  M. Gerstein,et al.  What is a gene, post-ENCODE? History and updated definition. , 2007, Genome research.

[31]  Christopher R. Myers,et al.  Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  Jens Timmer,et al.  Data-based identifiability analysis of non-linear dynamical models , 2007, Bioinform..

[33]  Patrick Royston,et al.  Profile Likelihood for Estimation and Confidence Intervals , 2007 .

[34]  Martin Mönnigmann,et al.  Systematic identifiability testing for unambiguous mechanistic modeling – application to JAK-STAT, MAP kinase, and NF-κB signaling pathway models , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[35]  J. Banga,et al.  Computational procedures for optimal experimental design in biological systems. , 2008, IET systems biology.

[36]  Jens Timmer,et al.  Dynamical modeling and multi-experiment fitting with PottersWheel , 2008, Bioinform..

[37]  Ursula Klingmüller,et al.  Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood , 2009, Bioinform..

[38]  E. Gilles,et al.  Analysis of an apoptotic core model focused on experimental design using artificial data. , 2009, IET systems biology.

[39]  Roland Eils,et al.  Optimal Experimental Design for Parameter Estimation of a Cell Signaling Model , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[40]  J. Timmer,et al.  Systems biology: experimental design , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[41]  T. Maiwald,et al.  Materials and Methods SOM Text Figs. S1 to S16 References Materials and Methods , 2022 .