Listener, Task, and Auditory Graph: Toward a Conceptual Model of Auditory Graph Comprehension
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Lorna M. Brown,et al. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR AUDIO PRESENTATION OF GRAPHS AND TABLES , 2003 .
[2] B. Burns. Percepts, concepts, and categories : the representation and processing of information , 1992 .
[3] Antti Pirhonen,et al. NON-SPEECH SOUNDS AS ELEMENTS OF A USE SCENARIO: A SEMIOTIC PERSPECTIVE , 2006 .
[4] C. Carswell,et al. 16 Reading Graphs: Interactions of Processing Requirements and Stimulus Structure , 1992 .
[5] Bruce N. Walker,et al. BRIEF TRAINING FOR PERFORMANCE OF A POINT ESTIMATION SONIFICATION TASK , 2005 .
[6] Stephen Brewster,et al. Using non-speech sound to overcome information overload , 1997 .
[7] A Lewis,et al. THE SCIENCE OF SOUND , 1997 .
[8] Bruce N. Walker,et al. PSYCHOPHYSICAL SCALING OF SONIFICATION MAPPINGS: A COMPARISION OF VISUALLY IMPAIRED AND SIGHTED LISTENERS , 2001 .
[9] Bruce N. Walker,et al. Effects of Auditory Context Cues and Training on Performance of a Point Estimation Sonification Task , 2005 .
[10] W R GARNER. The accuracy of counting repeated short tones. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.
[11] Stephen A. Brewster,et al. An evaluation of earcons for use in auditory human-computer interfaces , 1993, INTERCHI.
[12] Ephraim P. Glinert,et al. An experiment into the use of auditory cues to reduce visual workload , 1989, CHI '89.
[13] Susan Bell Trickett,et al. Toward a Comprehensive Model of Graph Comprehension: Making the Case for Spatial Cognition , 2006, Diagrams.
[14] Mary Anne Buttigieg,et al. Object Displays Do Not Always Support Better Integrated Task Performance , 1989 .
[15] E. Schellenberg,et al. Good Pitch Memory Is Widespread , 2003, Psychological science.
[16] John H. Flowers,et al. THIRTEEN YEARS OF REFLECTION ON AUDITORY GRAPHING: PROMISES, PITFALLS, AND POTENTIAL NEW DIRECTIONS , 2005 .
[17] Lorna M. Brown,et al. BROWSING MODES FOR EXPLORING SONIFIED LINE GRAPHS , 2002 .
[18] Barbara Tversky,et al. Graphs in Print , 2002, Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning.
[19] John G. Neuhoff,et al. PITCH CHANGE, SONIFICATION, AND MUSICAL EXPERTISE: WHICH WAY IS UP? , 2002 .
[20] Bruce N. Walker,et al. Data density and trend reversals in auditory graphs: Effects on point-estimation and trend-identification tasks , 2008, TAP.
[21] Gregory Kramer,et al. An introduction to auditory display , 1994 .
[22] Gregory Kramer,et al. Pitch and loudness interact in auditory displays: can the data get lost in the map? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[23] Priti Shah,et al. A Model of the Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Graph Comprehension , 1998 .
[24] Terri L. Bonebright,et al. Testing the effectiveness of sonified graphs for education: A programmatic research project , 2001 .
[25] C T WHITE,et al. Temporal numerosity. III. Auditory perception of number. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.
[26] Stephen A. Brewster,et al. Overcoming the Lack of Screen Space on Mobile Computers , 2002, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.
[27] D J Gillan,et al. A Componential Model of Human Interaction with Graphs: 1. Linear Regression Modeling , 1994, Human factors.
[28] D. Deutsch,et al. The Internal Representation of Pitch Sequences in Tonal Music , 1981 .
[29] Edward Childs. Auditory graphs of real-time data , 2005 .
[30] Priti Shah,et al. Graph Comprehension: The Role of Format, Content and Individual Differences , 2002, Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning.
[31] Bruce N. Walker,et al. Individual Differences, Cognitive Abilities, and the Interpretation of Auditory Graphs , 2004, ICAD.
[32] Albert S. Bregman,et al. Auditory scene analysis : hearing in complex environments , 1993 .
[33] Bruce N. Walker,et al. An agenda for research and development of multimodal graphs , 2005 .
[34] W. Turnbull,et al. Pitch discrimination as a function of tonal duration , 1944 .
[35] Alberto de Campo,et al. Toward a data sonification design space map , 2007 .
[36] S. Kosslyn. Understanding charts and graphs , 1989 .
[37] A. Treisman,et al. Emergent features, attention, and object perception. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[38] W. Cleveland,et al. Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods , 1984 .
[39] Tony Stockman,et al. AUDITORY GRAPHS: A SUMMARY OF CURRENT EXPERIENCE AND TOWARD S A RESEARCH AGENDA , 2005 .
[40] John H. Flowers,et al. Data sonification from the desktop: Should sound be part of standard data analysis software? , 2005, TAP.
[41] M. Wertheimer. Laws of organization in perceptual forms. , 1938 .
[42] Stephen A. Brewster,et al. Presenting dynamic information on mobile computers , 2006, Personal Technologies.
[43] Steven Pinker,et al. A theory of graph comprehension. , 1990 .
[44] Jozsef A. Toth,et al. The Role of Representation and Working Memory in Diagrammatic Reasoning and Decision Making , 2002, Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning.
[45] Susan Bell Trickett,et al. A New Model of Graph and Visualization Usage , 2001 .
[46] Gregory Kramer,et al. Auditory Display: Sonification, Audification, And Auditory Interfaces , 1994 .
[47] John H. Flowers,et al. SONIFICATION OF DAILY WEATHER RECORDS: ISSUES OF PERCEPTION, ATTENTION AND MEMORY IN DESIGN CHOICES , 2001 .
[48] Stephen Barrass,et al. Auditory information design , 1998 .
[49] John G. Neuhoff,et al. Sonification Report: Status of the Field and Research Agenda Prepared for the National Science Foundation by members of the International Community for Auditory Display , 1999 .
[50] Lorna M. Brown,et al. DRAWING BY EAR: INTERPRETING SONIFIED LINE GRAPHS , 2003 .
[51] Bruce N. Walker,et al. Tick-marks, axes, and labels: The effects of adding context to auditory graphs , 2002 .
[52] A Ehrenstein,et al. Pitch and pitch change interact in auditory displays. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[53] John H. Flowers,et al. The effects of task demands on the equivalence of visual and auditory representations of periodic numerical data , 1996 .
[54] S. S. Stevens. Listening and Attention. , 1970 .
[55] W. R. Garner,et al. Pitch characteristics of short tones; pitch as a function of tonal duration. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.
[56] Hesham M. Kamel,et al. A Comparison of Three Nonvisual Methods for Presenting Scientific Graphs , 2002 .
[57] Bruno L. Giordano,et al. Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect , 2006, Cognition.
[58] Judy Edworthy. Does sound help us to work better with machines? A commentary on Rauterberg's paper ‘About the importance of auditory alarms during the operation of a plant simulator’ , 1998 .
[59] Bruce N Walker,et al. Magnitude estimation of conceptual data dimensions for use in sonification. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[60] H B TIMMERMAN,et al. What is task analysis? , 1951, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.
[61] David M. Lane,et al. SONIFICATION OF ABSOLUTE VALUES WITH SINGLE AND MULTIPLE DIMENSIONS , 2003 .
[62] Bruce N. Walker,et al. RELATIVE INTENSITY OF AUDITORY CONTEXT FOR AUDITORY GRAPH DESIGN , 2006 .
[63] M. R. Jones,et al. Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. , 1976, Psychological review.
[64] Charles S. Watson,et al. Factors in the design of effective auditory displays , 1994 .
[65] Robens Anderson,et al. Creating an Empirical Framework for Sonification Design , 2005 .
[66] Bruce N. Walker,et al. Consistency of magnitude estimations with conceptual data dimensions used for sonification , 2007 .
[67] Christopher Frauenberger,et al. Patterns in auditory menu design , 2006 .
[68] I. Nelken. Demonstrations of Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound by Albert S. Bregman and Pierre A. Ahad, MIT Press, 1996. £15.95 CD , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.