Defining a strategical framework for urban pedestrianization projects: assessment of walkability in 3 urban squares in Istanbul

There has been a growing interest in the transformation of major urban squares in Istanbul in recent years. This heightened trend in the urban renewal of prominent areas within the city has led to multiple pedestrianization projects aimed to revitalize urban cores in terms of infrastructure and pedestrian activity. Despite their strategic schemes, these proposed projects lack an objective methodology to implement systematically at various scales. This paper focuses on the walkability of 3 historical urban squares in Istanbul by analyzing their street configuration and land use compositions and comparing it with the levels of pedestrian movement. The main objective of this study is to determine the existing relationship between space allocation and pedestrian activity and to assess the efficiency of proposed pedestrianization projects developed by local authorities for these areas. Overall, the analyses presented in this study emphasize the importance of measures of street connectivity in walkability studies. It is shown that street network configuration; measured using both metric and directional connectivity measures at the road-segment scale is strongly associated with pedestrian movement when controlling for land use compositions at the parcel-level. Based on the spatial analysis and statistical models produced for the research area, a pedestrian-oriented strategical framework that takes into account the existing spatial configuration, parcel-based land-use compositions, as well as pedestrian movement distributions within the areas is proposed for the study areas and their surroundings. With its systematic methodology, efficient spatial models, and strategical approach, this study is anticipated to be used as a unique design framework for prospective urban design and pedestrianization projects for Istanbul.

[1]  Hendriek C Boshuizen,et al.  Factors of the physical environment associated with walking and bicycling. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  Billie Giles-Corti,et al.  Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  K. Stanilov,et al.  Site Design and Pedestrian Travel , 1999 .

[4]  R. Ewing,et al.  Best Development Practices , 1996 .

[5]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework , 2002 .

[6]  Ted M. Matley,et al.  Pedestrian Travel Potential in Northern New Jersey: A Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Approach to Identifying Investment Priorities , 2000 .

[7]  K. Bartholomew,et al.  Making the land use, transportation, air quality connection , 1993 .

[8]  J N Bailenson,et al.  The initial segment strategy: A heuristic for route selection , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[9]  A. Bauman,et al.  Associations of Location and Perceived Environmental Attributes with Walking in Neighborhoods , 2004, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[10]  Brian Grady,et al.  Travel Demand Modeling for Regional Visioning and Scenario Analysis , 2005 .

[11]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Road Climbing: Principles Governing Asymmetric Route Choices on Maps , 1998 .

[12]  J. Sallis,et al.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[13]  Daniel A. Rodriguez,et al.  The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment , 2004 .

[14]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  Relation of modifiable neighborhood attributes to walking. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[15]  R Conroy-Dalton The secret is to follow your nose: route path selection and angularity , 2001 .

[16]  R. Cervero,et al.  Travel Choices in Pedestrian Versus Automobile Oriented Neighborhoods - eScholarship , 1995 .

[17]  Ayse Ozbil Torun,et al.  The effect of built space on wayfinding in urban environments: a study of the historical peninsula in İstanbul , 2012 .

[18]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Spatial Orientation and the Angularity of Urban Routes , 1991 .

[19]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Network effects and psychological effects: a theory of urban movement , 2005 .

[20]  L. Frank,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LAND USE AND TRAVEL BEHAVIOR IN THE PUGET SOUND REGION. FINAL SUMMARY REPORT , 1994 .

[21]  J. Landis,et al.  The Influence of Built-Form and Land Use on Mode Choice , 2003 .

[22]  David R. Ragland,et al.  Space Syntax: Innovative Pedestrian Volume Modeling Tool for Pedestrian Safety , 2003 .

[23]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture , 1996 .

[24]  R. Kitamura,et al.  A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[25]  M. Boarnet,et al.  Can Land Use Policy Really Affect Travel Behavior? A Study of the Link between Non-Work Travel and Land Use Characteristics , 1996 .

[26]  K. Krizek Residential Relocation and Changes in Urban Travel: Does Neighborhood-Scale Urban Form Matter? , 2003 .

[27]  John Peponis,et al.  The Connectivity of Streets: Reach and Directional Distance , 2008 .

[28]  Edward K. Sadalla,et al.  The Perception of Traversed Distance , 1980 .

[29]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[30]  P. Jansen-Osmann,et al.  The Influence of Turns on Distance Cognition , 2004 .

[31]  Markus Knauff,et al.  Up the down staircase : Wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings , 2006 .

[32]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Influence of estimation errors on wayfinding-decisions in unknown street networks – analyzing the least-angle strategy , 2001, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[33]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Urban Form and Pedestrian Choices: Study of Austin Neighborhoods , 1996 .

[34]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  The effects of neighborhood density and street connectivity on walking behavior: the Twin Cities walking study , 2007, Epidemiologic perspectives & innovations : EP+I.

[35]  A. Bauman,et al.  Understanding environmental influences on walking; Review and research agenda. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[36]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Mental Maze Solving , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Susan L Handy,et al.  How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[38]  Ayse Ozbil,et al.  Understanding the link between street connectivity, land use and pedestrian flows , 2011 .

[39]  Shannon Dawn Moeser Cognitive Mapping in a Complex Building , 1988 .