Osteogenesis of 3D printed porous Ti6Al4V implants with different pore sizes.

Selective laser melting (SLM) is one of the three-dimensional (3D) printing techniques that manufacturing versatile porous scaffolds with precise architectures for potential orthopedic application. To understand how the pore sizes of porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds affect their biological performances, we designed and fabricated porous Ti6Al4V implants with straightforward pore dimensions (500, 700, and 900 µm) via SLM, termed as p500, p700, and p900 respectively. The morphological characteristics of Ti6Al4V scaffolds were assessed showing that the actual pore sizes of these scaffolds were 401 ± 26 µm, 607 ± 24 µm, 801 ± 33 µm, respectively. The mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V scaffolds were also evaluated showing that they were comparable to that of bone tissues. Meanwhile, the effect of pore size on biological responses was systematically investigated in vitro and in vivo. It was verified that 3D printing technique was able to fabricate porous Ti6Al4V implants with proper mechanical properties analogous to human bone. The in vitro results revealed that scaffolds with appropriate pore dimension were conducive to cell adhesion, proliferation and early differentiation. Furthermore, the porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds were implanted into the rabbit femur to investigate bone regeneration performance, the in vivo experiment showed the p700 sample was in favor of bone ingrowth into implant pores and bone-implant fixation stability. Taken together, the biological performance of p700 group with actual pore size of about 600 µm was superior to other two groups. The obtained findings provide basis to individually design and fabricate suitable porous Ti6Al4V with specific geometries for orthopedic application.

[1]  M. Niederberger,et al.  Controlled fabrication of porous metals from the nanometer to the macroscopic scale , 2015 .

[2]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. , 2012, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[3]  A. Singh,et al.  Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A review , 2009 .

[4]  Yan Hu,et al.  Influence of strontium ions incorporated into nanosheet-pore topographical titanium substrates on osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and on osseointegration in vivo. , 2016, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[5]  Vaclav Svorcik,et al.  Modulation of cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation on materials designed for body implants. , 2011, Biotechnology advances.

[6]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[7]  C. Chu,et al.  Bone-like apatite growth on controllable macroporous titanium scaffolds coated with microporous titania. , 2018, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[8]  A. A. Zadpoor,et al.  Selective laser melting‐produced porous titanium scaffolds regenerate bone in critical size cortical bone defects , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  Amit Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. , 2012, Trends in biotechnology.

[10]  Hongchao Kou,et al.  Influence of pore size of porous titanium fabricated by vacuum diffusion bonding of titanium meshes on cell penetration and bone ingrowth. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[11]  Yan Hu,et al.  Fabrication of tantalum oxide layers onto titanium substrates for improved corrosion resistance and cytocompatibility , 2015 .

[12]  Yanen Wang,et al.  Electron Beam Melting Fabrication of Porous Ti6Al4V Scaffolds: Cytocompatibility and Osteogenesis , 2015 .

[13]  Wei Xu,et al.  Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[14]  Zhongjun Liu,et al.  In Vivo Study of a Self-Stabilizing Artificial Vertebral Body Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting , 2014, Spine.

[15]  J. Schrooten,et al.  Peri- and intra-implant bone response to microporous Ti coatings with surface modification. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[16]  H Van Oosterwyck,et al.  The effect of pore geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[17]  D. Pasini,et al.  High-strength porous biomaterials for bone replacement: A strategy to assess the interplay between cell morphology, mechanical properties, bone ingrowth and manufacturing constraints. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[18]  Yan Hu,et al.  Regulation of the biological functions of osteoblasts and bone formation by Zn-incorporated coating on microrough titanium. , 2014, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[19]  Lewis Mullen,et al.  Selective Laser Melting: a regular unit cell approach for the manufacture of porous, titanium, bone in-growth constructs, suitable for orthopedic applications. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[20]  M. Bermingham,et al.  Mechanical properties and biocompatibility of porous titanium scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2017, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[21]  Tomiharu Matsushita,et al.  Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo experiment. , 2016, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[22]  E. Brunner,et al.  Growth behavior, matrix production, and gene expression of human osteoblasts in defined cylindrical titanium channels. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[23]  A. A. Zadpoor,et al.  Effect of Alkali-Acid-Heat Chemical Surface Treatment on Electron Beam Melted Porous Titanium and Its Apatite Forming Ability , 2015, Materials.

[24]  Dan Leordean,et al.  Studies on design of customized orthopedic endoprostheses of titanium alloy manufactured by SLM , 2015 .

[25]  Richard O C Oreffo,et al.  Bone tissue engineering: hope vs hype. , 2002, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[26]  Abhay Pandit,et al.  Biomimetic approaches in bone tissue engineering: Integrating biological and physicomechanical strategies. , 2015, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[27]  M. Neo,et al.  Osteoinduction of porous Ti implants with a channel structure fabricated by selective laser melting. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[28]  Barbara D Boyan,et al.  Additively manufactured 3D porous Ti-6Al-4V constructs mimic trabecular bone structure and regulate osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and local factor production in a porosity and surface roughness dependent manner , 2014, Biofabrication.

[29]  Tadashi Kokubo,et al.  How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? , 2006, Biomaterials.

[30]  Aleksandar Matic,et al.  3D printed Ti6Al4V implant surface promotes bone maturation and retains a higher density of less aged osteocytes at the bone-implant interface. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[31]  Y. Estrin,et al.  Accelerated stem cell attachment to ultrafine grained titanium. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[32]  D. Chakrabarti,et al.  Influence of Porosity and Pore-Size Distribution in Ti6Al4 V Foam on Physicomechanical Properties, Osteogenesis, and Quantitative Validation of Bone Ingrowth by Micro-Computed Tomography. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[33]  Yan Hu,et al.  Surface functionalization of titanium implants with chitosan-catechol conjugate for suppression of ROS-induced cells damage and improvement of osteogenesis. , 2017, Biomaterials.

[34]  E. Baril,et al.  Direct visualization and quantification of bone growth into porous titanium implants using micro computed tomography , 2011, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[35]  Barbara D Boyan,et al.  Enhanced Osteoblast Response to Porosity and Resolution of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Constructs with Trabeculae-Inspired Porosity. , 2016, 3D printing and additive manufacturing.

[36]  Zhi-Yong Zhang,et al.  Porous titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium cage has better osseointegration and less micromotion than a poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in sheep vertebral fusion. , 2013, Artificial organs.

[37]  Georg N Duda,et al.  Biomaterial delivery of morphogens to mimic the natural healing cascade in bone. , 2012, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[38]  Jinshan Li,et al.  Anisotropic porous titanium with superior mechanical compatibility in the range of physiological strain rate for trabecular bone implant applications , 2014 .

[39]  Hala Zreiqat,et al.  Design and Fabrication of 3D printed Scaffolds with a Mechanical Strength Comparable to Cortical Bone to Repair Large Bone Defects , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[40]  Michiel Mulier,et al.  Bone regeneration performance of surface-treated porous titanium. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[41]  Amir A Zadpoor,et al.  Bone tissue regeneration: the role of scaffold geometry. , 2015, Biomaterials science.

[42]  Jun Wang,et al.  The correlation between the internal structure and vascularization of controllable porous bioceramic materials in vivo: a quantitative study. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[43]  Tadashi Kokubo,et al.  Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[44]  J. Lausmaa,et al.  Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[45]  J. Kruth,et al.  Micro-CT-based improvement of geometrical and mechanical controllability of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V porous structures , 2011 .

[46]  Ethan L Nyberg,et al.  3D-Printing Technologies for Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Reconstruction, and Regeneration , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.