Engineered CRISPR-Cas12a variants with increased activities and improved targeting ranges for gene, epigenetic and base editing

Broad use of CRISPR–Cas12a (formerly Cpf1) nucleases1 has been hindered by the requirement for an extended TTTV protospacer adjacent motif (PAM)2. To address this limitation, we engineered an enhanced Acidaminococcus sp. Cas12a variant (enAsCas12a) that has a substantially expanded targeting range, enabling targeting of many previously inaccessible PAMs. On average, enAsCas12a exhibits a twofold higher genome editing activity on sites with canonical TTTV PAMs compared to wild-type AsCas12a, and we successfully grafted a subset of mutations from enAsCas12a onto other previously described AsCas12a variants3 to enhance their activities. enAsCas12a improves the efficiency of multiplex gene editing, endogenous gene activation and C-to-T base editing, and we engineered a high-fidelity version of enAsCas12a (enAsCas12a-HF1) to reduce off-target effects. Both enAsCas12a and enAsCas12a-HF1 function in HEK293T and primary human T cells when delivered as ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes. Collectively, enAsCas12a provides an optimized version of Cas12a that should enable wider application of Cas12a enzymes for gene and epigenetic editing.Structure-guided protein engineering of Cas12a yields variants that have increased activity and that can edit sites with previously inaccessible PAMs.

[1]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Crystal Structure of Cas9 in Complex with Guide RNA and Target DNA , 2014, Cell.

[2]  Tao Zhang,et al.  A CRISPR–Cpf1 system for efficient genome editing and transcriptional repression in plants , 2017, Nature Plants.

[3]  David R. Liu,et al.  Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage , 2016, Nature.

[4]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities , 2015, Nature.

[5]  David R. Liu,et al.  Efficient Delivery of Genome-Editing Proteins In Vitro and In Vivo , 2015 .

[6]  David R. Liu,et al.  Editing the Genome Without Double-Stranded DNA Breaks. , 2017, ACS chemical biology.

[7]  Sungroh Yoon,et al.  Deep learning improves prediction of CRISPR–Cpf1 guide RNA activity , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Ryan D. Chow,et al.  Mapping in vivo genetic interactomics through Cpf1 crRNA array screening , 2017, bioRxiv.

[9]  H. Nishimasu,et al.  Structural Basis for the Altered PAM Recognition by Engineered CRISPR-Cpf1. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[10]  David A. Scott,et al.  Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity , 2015, Science.

[11]  J. Joung,et al.  High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 variants with undetectable genome-wide off-targets , 2015, Nature.

[12]  Ines Fonfara,et al.  The CRISPR-associated DNA-cleaving enzyme Cpf1 also processes precursor CRISPR RNA , 2016, Nature.

[13]  Jin-Wu Nam,et al.  In vivo high-throughput profiling of CRISPR–Cpf1 activity , 2016, Nature Methods.

[14]  Erik L. G. Wernersson,et al.  BLISS is a versatile and quantitative method for genome-wide profiling of DNA double-strand breaks , 2017, Nature Communications.

[15]  Tautvydas Karvelis,et al.  Rapid characterization of CRISPR-Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif sequence elements , 2015, Genome Biology.

[16]  Jinghong Han,et al.  Engineering cell signaling using tunable CRISPR–Cpf1-based transcription factors , 2017, Nature Communications.

[17]  Xuan Zheng,et al.  Multiplex gene regulation by CRISPR-ddCpf1 , 2017, Cell Discovery.

[18]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  FLASH Assembly of TALENs Enables High-Throughput Genome Editing , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Li Yang,et al.  Base editing with a Cpf1–cytidine deaminase fusion , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Engineered Cpf1 variants with altered PAM specificities increase genome targeting range , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR-Cas9 targeting accuracy , 2017, Nature.

[22]  Morgan L. Maeder,et al.  CRISPR RNA-guided activation of endogenous human genes , 2013, Nature Methods.

[23]  David R. Liu,et al.  CRISPR-Based Technologies for the Manipulation of Eukaryotic Genomes , 2017, Cell.

[24]  Antonia A. Dominguez,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of hepatic lipogenesis , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[25]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  GUIDE-Seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  Kira S. Makarova,et al.  Diversity and evolution of class 2 CRISPR–Cas systems , 2017, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[27]  Daesik Kim,et al.  Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins , 2014, Genome research.

[28]  Jonathan Y. Hsu,et al.  Inducible and multiplex gene regulation using CRISPR-Cpf1-based transcription factors , 2017, Nature Methods.

[29]  N. Perrimon,et al.  Highly-efficient Cas9-mediated transcriptional programming , 2015, Nature Methods.

[30]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Gene activation in human cells using CRISPR/Cpf1-p300 and CRISPR/Cpf1-SunTag systems , 2017, Protein & Cell.

[31]  A. Kondo,et al.  Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems , 2016, Science.

[32]  Jason Potter,et al.  apid and highly efficient mammalian cell engineering via as 9 protein transfection , 2015 .

[33]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  Discovery and Functional Characterization of Diverse Class 2 CRISPR-Cas Systems. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[34]  F. Studier,et al.  Stable expression clones and auto-induction for protein production in E. coli. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[35]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Biology and Applications of CRISPR Systems: Harnessing Nature’s Toolbox for Genome Engineering , 2016, Cell.

[36]  A. Regev,et al.  Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System , 2015, Cell.

[37]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  Efficient Delivery of Genome-Editing Proteins In Vitro and In Vivo , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[38]  Shondra M. Pruett-Miller,et al.  A Survey of Validation Strategies for CRISPR-Cas9 Editing , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Open-source guideseq software for analysis of GUIDE-seq data , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[40]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 nucleases in human cells , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[41]  E. Lander,et al.  Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas 9 for Genome Engineering , 2015 .

[42]  Jin-Soo Kim,et al.  Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[43]  Beum-Chang Kang,et al.  CRISPR/Cpf1-mediated DNA-free plant genome editing , 2017, Nature Communications.

[44]  Luca Pinello,et al.  Analysis and comparison of genome editing using CRISPResso2 , 2018, bioRxiv.

[45]  D. Patel,et al.  Type V CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 endonuclease employs a unique mechanism for crRNA-mediated target DNA recognition , 2016, Cell Research.

[46]  E. M. DeGennaro,et al.  Multiplex gene editing by CRISPR-Cpf1 through autonomous processing of a single crRNA array , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[47]  M. Farzan,et al.  Cpf1 proteins excise CRISPR RNAs from mRNA transcripts in mammalian cells , 2017, Nature chemical biology.

[48]  D. Reich,et al.  Cost-effective, high-throughput DNA sequencing libraries for multiplexed target capture , 2012, Genome research.

[49]  E. Lander,et al.  Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering , 2014, Cell.

[50]  N. Pollet,et al.  Comparison of T7E1 and Surveyor Mismatch Cleavage Assays to Detect Mutations Triggered by Engineered Nucleases , 2015, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[51]  Kira S. Makarova,et al.  Crystal Structure of Cpf1 in Complex with Guide RNA and Target DNA , 2016, Cell.

[52]  Antonio J Giraldez,et al.  CRISPR-Cpf1 mediates efficient homology-directed repair and temperature-controlled genome editing , 2017, bioRxiv.

[53]  Namritha Ravinder,et al.  Rapid and highly efficient mammalian cell engineering via Cas9 protein transfection. , 2015, Journal of biotechnology.