Contextual Effects on the Complementarities Between R&D Activities: An Empirical Analysis of the Korean Manufacturing Industry

Firms undertake various R&D activities to generate commercializable innovations and to create and sustain competitive advantage. However, mere exploitation of various R&D opportunities has no conclusive impacts on a firm's competitive advantage in innovation, since R&D activities might closely interact with each other and their appropriate combination would have a synergy effect on a firm's innovation performance. The aim of this paper is to explore various contextual factors behind synergy effects derived from interactions between R&D activities based on the economic and technological sources of the R&D complementarities, such as absorptive capacity, knowledge flows, and uncertainty, as well as to examine the existence of complementarities between corporate R&D activities, using the 2004 innovation survey data of Korean manufacturing industries. The corporate R&D activities considered in this study are in-house R&D, R&D cooperation, and commissioned R&D. Our research concludes that there exists a complementary relationship between a firm,s internal R&D and R&D cooperation activity. In addition, our study discovered that the complementarity between R&D activities relies on the organizational contextualities, a firm's cumulative patent stocks, perceived level of imitation risk, experience of external knowledge acquisition, and information inflows from public research institutes and universities?that lie hidden under the firm-specific activities.

[1]  Lung-fei Lee Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity , 1983 .

[2]  Claudia Schmiedeberg,et al.  Complementarities of innovation activities: An empirical analysis of the German manufacturing sector , 2008 .

[3]  Tobias Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge Flows and R&D Co-Operation: Firm-Level Evidence from Germany , 2005 .

[4]  Franz C. Palm,et al.  Wald Criteria for Jointly Testing Equality and Inequality , 1986 .

[5]  A. Vinding Absorptive Capacity and Innovative Performance: A Human Capital Approach , 2006 .

[6]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[7]  R. Veugelers Internal R & D expenditures and external technology sourcing , 1997 .

[8]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[9]  A. Arora,et al.  Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology , 1994 .

[10]  R. Nelson The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  D. Mowery,et al.  Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems , 1995 .

[12]  Steven P. Cassou,et al.  Health Plan Choice and the Utilization of Health Care Services , 1991 .

[13]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[14]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .