Performance improvement of rail track substructure using artificial inclusions – Experimental and numerical studies

Abstract Large and frequent loads from heavy freight and passenger trains often lead to the progressive track deterioration. The excessive deformation and degradation of ballast and unacceptable differential settlement of track and/or pumping of underlying soft subgrade soils necessitates frequent and costly track maintenance. However, artificial inclusions such as geogrids and shockmats can mitigate ballast degradation and improve track performance. A quantitative assessment of the influence of breakage, fouling, and the effects of artificial inclusions on the shear behaviour of ballast can be performed either experimentally or numerically. Numerical modelling can simulate these aspects subject to various types of loading and boundary conditions for a range of material properties so in this study, the stress–strain and degradation response of ballast was analysed through discrete element (DEM) and finite element (FEM) methods. In DEM, irregularly shaped ballast aggregates were simulated by clumping together spheres in appropriate sizes and positions. In FEM, a composite multi-layer track system was simulated and an elasto-plastic model with a non-associative flow rule was used to capture ballast degradation. These DEM and FEM simulations showed a good agreement with large-scale laboratory tests. This paper outlines the advantages of the proposed DEM and FEM models in terms of capturing the correct stress–strain and degradation response of ballast with particular emphasis on particle breakage and fouling, as well as applications of geosynthetic grids and shockmats.

[1]  Tzou-Shin Ueng,et al.  Energy aspects of particle breakage in drained shear of sands , 2000 .

[2]  Nick Thom,et al.  Identifying the key parameters that influence geogrid reinforcement of railway ballast , 2007 .

[3]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Behavior of Geocell-Reinforced Subballast Subjected to Cyclic Loading in Plane-Strain Condition , 2015 .

[4]  B. Indraratna,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Study of Railway Ballast Behavior under Cyclic Loading , 2010 .

[5]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[6]  D Lyon,et al.  THE EFFECT OF TRACK AND VEHICLE PARAMETERS ON WHEEL/RAIL VERTICAL DYNAMIC FORCES , 1974 .

[7]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Enhancement of rail track performance through utilisation of geosynthetic inclusions , 2014 .

[8]  Masaki Seki,et al.  Reinforcement of railway ballasted track with geosynthetic bags for preventing derailment , 2013 .

[9]  B. Indraratna,et al.  Deformation and Degradation Mechanisms of Railway Ballast under High Frequency Cyclic Loading , 2016 .

[10]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Implications of ballast breakage on ballasted railway track based on numerical modelling , 2011 .

[11]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Effect of confining pressure on the degradation of ballast under cyclic loading , 2005 .

[12]  P. W. Rowe The stress-dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact , 1962, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[13]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  An integrated approach to dynamic analysis of railroad track transitions behavior , 2014 .

[14]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Improved Performance of Railway Ballast under Impact Loads Using Shock Mats , 2012 .

[15]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Behavior of fresh and fouled railway ballast subjected to direct shear testing: discrete element simulation , 2014 .

[16]  A. M. Lahlaf,et al.  Dynamic Interface Shear Strength Properties of Geomembranes and Geotextiles , 1992 .

[17]  G. McDowell,et al.  Discrete element modelling of railway ballast , 2005 .

[18]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  The role of ballast fouling characteristics on the drainage capacity of rail substructure , 2012 .

[19]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Numerical and analytical modeling of particle degredation , 2015 .

[20]  Ernest T. Selig,et al.  GEOTRACK MODEL FOR RAILROAD TRACK PERFORMANCE , 1980 .

[21]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Observed and predicted behaviour of rail ballast under monotonic loading capturing particle breakage , 2015 .

[22]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  A constitutive model for coal-fouled ballast capturing the effects of particle degradation , 2014 .

[23]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Behaviour of clay-fouled ballast under drained triaxial testing , 2013 .

[24]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Improved Performance of Ballasted Rail Track Using Geosynthetics and Rubber Shockmat , 2016 .

[25]  B. Indraratna,et al.  Effect of confining pressure on ballast degradation and deformation under cyclic triaxial loading , 2007 .

[26]  René de Borst,et al.  A numerical model for the cyclic deterioration of railway tracks , 2003 .

[27]  B. Indraratna,et al.  Field Assessment of the Performance of a Ballasted Rail Track with and without Geosynthetics , 2010 .

[28]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  From theory to practice in track geomechanics – Australian perspective for synthetic inclusions , 2014 .

[29]  Dingqing Li,et al.  METHOD FOR RAILROAD TRACK FOUNDATION DESIGN. I: DEVELOPMENT , 1998 .

[30]  Ernest T. Selig,et al.  Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management , 1995 .

[31]  小田 匡寛,et al.  Mechanics of granular materials : an introduction , 1999 .

[32]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Deformation of Coal Fouled Ballast Stabilized with Geogrid under Cyclic Load , 2013 .

[33]  Xiaohui Zhang,et al.  An investigation of subgrade differential settlement on the dynamic response of the vehicle–track system , 2016 .

[34]  Justin Kennedy,et al.  Application of in situ polyurethane geocomposite beams to improve the passive shoulder resistance of railway track , 2012 .

[35]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  The Behaviour of Ballasted Track Foundations: Track Drainage and Geosynthetic Reinforcement , 2010 .

[36]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  DEM simulation of the behaviour of geogrid stabilised ballast fouled with coal , 2014 .

[37]  Yang H. Huang KENTRACK, A COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR HOT-MIX ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL BALLAST RAILWAY TRACKBEDS , 1984 .

[38]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Performance assessment of reinforced ballasted rail track , 2014 .

[39]  Karl Josef Witt,et al.  Numerical study of transition zone between ballasted and ballastless railway track , 2015 .

[40]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  A review of loading conditions for railway track structures due to train and track vertical interaction , 2008 .

[41]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Behavior of geogrid-reinforced ballast under various levels of fouling , 2011 .

[42]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Geogrid-Aggregate Interlock Mechanism Investigated through Aggregate Imaging-Based Discrete Element Modeling Approach , 2012 .

[43]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Stress-Strain Degradation Response of Railway Ballast Stabilized with Geosynthetics , 2013 .

[44]  J. T. Shahu,et al.  Parametric study of resilient response of tracks with a sub-ballast layer , 1999 .