Effect of Augmentation Material Stiffness on Adjacent Vertebrae after Osteoporotic Vertebroplasty Using Finite Element Analysis with Different Loading Methods.

BACKGROUND Vertebroplasty is an effective treatment for osteoporotic vertebral fractures, which are one of the most common fractures associated with osteoporosis. However, clinical observation has shown that the risk of adjacent vertebral body fractures may increase after vertebroplasty. The mechanism underlying adjacent vertebral body fracture after vertebroplasty is not clear; excessive stiffness resulting from polymethyl methacrylate has been suspected as an important mechanism. OBJECTIVES The aim of our study was to compare the effects of bone cement stiffness on adjacent vertebrae after osteoporotic vertebroplasty under load-controlled versus displacement-controlled conditions. STUDY DESIGN An experimental computer study using a finite element analysis. SETTING Medical research institute, university hospital, Korean. METHODS A three-dimensional digital anatomic model of L1/2 bone structure was reconstructed from human computed tomographic images. The reconstructed three-dimensional geometry was processed for finite element analysis such as meshing elements and applying material properties. Two boundary conditions, load-controlled and displacement-controlled methods, were applied to each of 5 deformation modes: compression, flexion, extension, lateral bending, and torsion. RESULTS The adjacent L1 vertebra, irrespective of augmentation, revealed nearly similar maximum von Mises stresses under the load-controlled condition. However, for the displacement-controlled condition, the maximum von Mises stresses in the cortical bone and inferior endplate of the adjacent L1 vertebra increased significantly after cement augmentation. This increase was more significant than that with stiffer bone cement under all modes, except the torsion mode. LIMITATIONS The finite element model was simplified, excluding muscular forces and incorporating a large volume of bone cement, to more clearly demonstrate effects of bone cement stiffness on adjacent vertebrae after vertebroplasty. CONCLUSION Excessive stiffness of augmented bone cement increases the risk of adjacent vertebral fractures after vertebroplasty in an osteoporotic finite element model. This result was most prominently observed using the displacement-controlled method.

[1]  V K Goel,et al.  A combined finite element and optimization investigation of lumbar spine mechanics with and without muscles. , 1993, Spine.

[2]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Spinal loads after osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[3]  J. Margulies,et al.  The Relationship Between Degenerative Changes and Osteoporosis in the Lumbar Spine , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  G. Baroud,et al.  Biomechanical impact of vertebroplasty. Postoperative biomechanics of vertebroplasty. , 2006, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[5]  Huilin Yang,et al.  Filling Materials Used in Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty for Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Literature Review , 2011, Artificial cells, blood substitutes, and immobilization biotechnology.

[6]  P. Heini,et al.  Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA: operative technique and early results , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[7]  B. Bai,et al.  The use of an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute for the prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae and the management of vertebral compression fractures. , 1999, Spine.

[8]  Alexander Tsouknidas,et al.  Assessment of stress patterns on a spinal motion segment in healthy versus osteoporotic bony models with or without disc degeneration: a finite element analysis. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[9]  E. Schneider,et al.  Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[10]  L. Nolte,et al.  Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty. A biomechanical investigation. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  J. Nemes,et al.  Load shift of the intervertebral disc after a vertebroplasty: a finite-element study , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[12]  John A. Hipp,et al.  Effect of vertebroplasty on the compressive strength of vertebral bodies. , 2002, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[13]  Guojing Yang,et al.  The biomechanical effects of osteoporosis vertebral augmentation with cancellous bone granules or bone cement on treated and adjacent non-treated vertebral bodies: a finite element evaluation. , 2010, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7-29, 2000: highlights of the conference. , 2001, Southern medical journal.

[15]  納田 真也.  Adjacent vertebral body fracture following vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate or calcium phosphate cement : biomechanical evaluation of the cadaveric spine , 2010 .

[16]  M. Kurutz,et al.  Finite element analysis of weightbath hydrotraction treatment of degenerated lumbar spine segments in elastic phase. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  J. Ahn,et al.  Risk factors of new compression fractures in adjacent vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty , 2004, Acta radiologica.

[18]  Manohar M Panjabi,et al.  Effects of Charité Artificial Disc on the Implanted and Adjacent Spinal Segments Mechanics Using a Hybrid Testing Protocol , 2005, Spine.

[19]  King H. Yang,et al.  Mechanism of facet load transmission as a hypothesis for low-back pain. , 1984, Spine.

[20]  M. Libicher,et al.  Calcium-Phosphate and Polymethylmethacrylate Cement in Long-term Outcome After Kyphoplasty of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures , 2008, Spine.

[21]  A J BRANDENBURG,et al.  [Vertebral fractures]. , 1956, Geneeskundige gids.

[22]  Christoph Fankhauser,et al.  Augmentation of mechanical properties in osteoporotic vertebral bones – a biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty efficacy with different bone cements , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[23]  S. Belkoff,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new bone cement for use in vertebroplasty. , 2000, Spine.

[24]  C. Cooper,et al.  Vertebral fractures [8] , 1992 .

[25]  J. Graham,et al.  Effect of Bone Density on Vertebral Strength and Stiffness After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty , 2007, Spine.

[26]  D. Kallmes,et al.  New fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur significantly sooner. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[27]  Jin Fan,et al.  Risk Factors for New Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures After Vertebroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2013, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[28]  J. Grauer,et al.  Normal Functional Range of Motion of the Lumbar Spine During 15 Activities of Daily Living , 2010, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[29]  V K Goel,et al.  Effects of Muscle Dysfunction on Lumbar Spine Mechanics: A Finite Element Study Based on a Two Motion Segments Model , 1996, Spine.

[30]  Young-Joon Rho,et al.  Risk factors predicting the new symptomatic vertebral compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[31]  Zheng-Cheng Zhong,et al.  Load- and displacement-controlled finite element analyses on fusion and non-fusion spinal implants , 2009 .