'Volumetric analysis of hand and rotary root canal instrumentation and filling in primary teeth using Spiral Computed Tomography' - an invitro study.

AIM To compare and evaluate the volumetric analysis of pre- and post-root canal instrumentation in primary teeth using hand and rotary files and also to analyse the volume of root canal filling. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 20 primary teeth were divided into two groups randomly and subjected to spiral computed tomography (SCT) analysis before and after instrumentation. For manual technique (Group 1), teeth were prepared using K files and rotary (Group 2) preparation was performed with Mtwo files. Volumetric enlargement was calculated using Osirix software. Root canals were then filled with rotary lentulospiral using zinc oxide-eugenol cement (ZOE). The filled volume in each canal was measured using SCT and the percentage of obturated volume was calculated. The data were statistically analysed using paired t-tests. RESULTS There was a statistically significant difference in the volume of root canal enlarged in both the groups. Rotary files showed significant increase in the volume compared to K files. Mtwo instrumented root canals showed good obturated volume compared to manual technique, although voids were common in both the groups. CONCLUSION Rotary root canal instrumentation may be indicated for utilization in primary teeth, for enhancing root canal preparation and good quality of root canal filling.

[1]  José Carlos Pettorossi Imparato,et al.  Analysis of the instrumentation time and cleaning between manual and rotary techniques in deciduous molars , 2012 .

[2]  S. Asokan,et al.  Volumetric analysis of root canal fillings in primary teeth using spiral computed tomography: an in vitro study. , 2012, Journal of dentistry for children.

[3]  R. Cunha,et al.  Evaluation of cleaning capacity and instrumentation time of manual, hybrid and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars. , 2012, International endodontic journal.

[4]  L. Safi,et al.  Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and Pro Taper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth , 2012, Dental research journal.

[5]  M. Azar,et al.  Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals. , 2011, Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research.

[6]  A. Shigli,et al.  K-file vs ProFiles in cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in primary molar root canals: an in vitro study. , 2011, Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry.

[7]  S. Nagaraja,et al.  CT evaluation of canal preparation using rotary and hand NI-TI instruments: An in vitro study , 2010, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[8]  Varun Goyal,et al.  Evaluation and Comparison of Biological Cleaning Efficacy of Two Endofiles and Irrigants as Judged by Microbial Quantification in Primary Teeth — An In Vivo Study , 2009, International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[9]  M. Mehran,et al.  Root Canal Cleaning Efficacy of Rotary and Hand Files Instrumentation in Primary Molars , 2009, Iranian endodontic journal.

[10]  M. C. Calvo,et al.  Ex vivo study of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques in human primary teeth. , 2008, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[11]  N. Shashikiran,et al.  In vitro comparison of NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel hand instruments in root canal preparations of primary and permanent molar. , 2006, Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry.

[12]  E Schäfer,et al.  Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. , 2006, International endodontic journal.

[13]  E Schäfer,et al.  Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. , 2006, International endodontic journal.

[14]  P Martus,et al.  Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation. , 2005, International endodontic journal.

[15]  L. Breschi,et al.  SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[16]  Léa A B Silva,et al.  Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars. , 2004, Journal of dentistry for children.

[17]  D. Kleier,et al.  Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. , 1999, Pediatric dentistry.