Lateralized readiness potential interpret the effects of task difficulty on decision making

It is assumed that the network of cortical brain area associated with task difficulty may dynamically allocate resources for difficult decisions. As a result, it could play an indispensable role during the process of decision making. Recently, the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) is reinterpreted as a new way to study the evidence accumulation process during decision making. Therefore, we use LRP to investigate the effects of task difficulty on decision making. A motion detection experiment with three difficulty levels was conducted by 11 subjects. Both the EEG data and behavior data were recorded. The results show that the LRP was much more likely to appear before subjects make a response for a more difficult task. In addition, the reaction time was longer for a more difficult task. The drift diffusion model (DDM) fitting result also revealed that there had an apparently lower drift rate for the more difficult task (r=−0.463, p=0.01). These results suggest that the task difficulty would affect the quality of accumulated evidence and increase the motor preparation time, which leads to an increased decision time.

[1]  K M Spencer,et al.  The lateralized readiness potential: relationship between human data and response activation in a connectionist model. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[2]  I. Jentzsch,et al.  Distinguishing neural sources of movement preparation and execution An electrophysiological analysis , 2002, Biological Psychology.

[3]  W. Sommer,et al.  The structure of motor programming: evidence from reaction times and lateralized readiness potentials. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[4]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[5]  J T Mordkoff,et al.  Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: a comparison of available methods and procedures. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[6]  W. Sommer,et al.  Influences of presentation mode and time pressure on the utilisation of advance information in response preparation. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[7]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Neural Representation of Task Difficulty and Decision Making during Perceptual Categorization: A Timing Diagram , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  F. Díaz,et al.  Differences between mild cognitive impairment subtypes as indicated by event-related potential correlates of cognitive and motor processes in a Simon task. , 2014, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[9]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Reward rate optimization in two-alternative decision making: empirical tests of theoretical predictions. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  H. Leuthold.  Programming of expected and unexpected movements: effects on the onset of the lateralized readiness potential. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[11]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  A diffusion model decomposition of the effects of alcohol on perceptual decision making , 2011, Psychopharmacology.

[12]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Lateralized Readiness Potentials Reveal Properties of a Neural Mechanism for Implementing a Decision Threshold , 2014, PloS one.