Electric (dis) connections: Comparative review of smart grid news coverage in the United States and Canada

Abstract The term smart grid (SG) has been widely used in both the United States (U.S.) and Canada to represent multiple visions and configurations of electricity system change. In both countries policies, programs, and initiatives have emerged to promote technological and social changes associated with SG, and different patterns of SG implementation and governance are apparent at local, regional, and national levels. This paper reports on a comparative analysis of SG media content in nationally-circulating newspapers in the U.S. and Canada to explore patterns of SG conversations in the two countries. Media reporting about SG provides a valuable lens that reflects public discourse and also contributes to setting the public agenda by shaping public opinion and framing key issues. Despite similarities in terms of policy, program design, and SG deployment strategies, several prominent differences between the two countries emerge in public conversations. Firstly, Canadian SG newspaper content focuses more on implementation and describing people's experiences with smart meters, while the U.S. content focuses more on commercial opportunities with more reference to private sector actors and various technological components beyond smart meters. Secondly, although media coverage in both countries frequently highlights technological and economic benefits of SG, positive SG framing is more frequent in the U.S. newspapers than in the Canadian ones. Negative SG portrayals, including cultural, political and health and safety risks, are more frequently mentioned in the Canadian newspapers. These differing SG framings could be due to national level cultural differences. In the U.S, considered to be more of an individualistic society, there is more emphasis on business opportunities, being entrepreneurial, and more private sector involvement in the electricity sector. By contrast, in Canada, public authorities, more prominent in the electricity market than in the U.S., play a key role in smart grid deployment. Furthermore, in Canada, considered to have more social support structures for individuals and communities, there was more emphasis on the experiences of people. This suggests that cultural differences at the national level be a further contextual lens helpful to policy makers and technology proponents as they embark upon energy system change initiatives.

[1]  D. M. Thomas Canada and the United States : differences that count , 2000 .

[2]  Anabela Carvalho,et al.  Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change , 2007 .

[3]  H. Bulkeley,et al.  Making a smart city for the smart grid? The urban material politics of actualising smart electricity networks , 2016 .

[4]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Places and Spaces of Sustainability Transitions: Geographical Contributions to an Emerging Research and Policy Field , 2012 .

[5]  Alexander L. Davis,et al.  Preparing for smart grid technologies: A behavioral decision research approach to understanding consumer expectations about smart meters , 2012 .

[6]  D. Hess Smart meters and public acceptance: comparative analysis and governance implications , 2014 .

[7]  P. Devine‐Wright Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action , 2009 .

[8]  C. Gross,et al.  Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance , 2007 .

[9]  Jon M. Peha,et al.  The Many Meanings of 'Smart Grid' , 2009 .

[10]  Zhen Zhang Smart Grid in America and Europe: Similar Desires, Different Approaches (Part 1) , 2011 .

[11]  R. Shwom,et al.  Changing household consumption to address climate change: social scientific insights and challenges , 2012 .

[12]  Tarla Rai Peterson,et al.  Socio-political evaluation of energy deployment (SPEED) , 2014 .

[13]  Monica Gattinger,et al.  Borders and bridges : Canada's policy relations in North America , 2010 .

[14]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Towards a better understanding of people’s responses to renewable energy technologies: Insights from Social Representations Theory , 2015, Public understanding of science.

[15]  G. Hoberg,et al.  [Degrees of Freedom: Canada & the United States in a Changing World] , 1997 .

[16]  Margot Weijnen,et al.  Investing in smart grids within the market paradigm: The case of the Netherlands and its relevance for China , 2013 .

[17]  Susana Guerreiro,et al.  Making energy visible: sociopsychological aspects associated with the use of smart meters , 2015 .

[18]  Marc Poumadère,et al.  When meters start to talk: The public’s encounter with smart meters in France , 2015 .

[19]  M. Boykoff,et al.  Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage , 2007 .

[20]  D. Horst NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[21]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[22]  D. Ockwell,et al.  The role of discourse and linguistic framing effects in sustaining high carbon energy policy--An accessible introduction , 2010 .

[23]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Developing a critical agenda to understand pro‐environmental actions: contributions from Social Representations and Social Practices Theories , 2016 .

[24]  John Thøgersen,et al.  Responsible Technology Acceptance: Model Development and Application to Consumer Acceptance of Smart Grid Technology , 2014 .

[25]  Tarla Rai Peterson,et al.  Smart Grid (R)Evolution: Electric Power Struggles , 2015 .

[26]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid, or Electric - What Do Car Buyers Want? , 2013 .

[27]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Societal acceptance of carbon capture and storage technologies , 2007 .

[28]  M. Boykoff Who Speaks for the Climate?: Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change , 2011 .

[29]  G. Fraser,et al.  Understanding Canada: Building on the New Canadian Political Economy , 1996 .

[30]  Tarla Rai Peterson,et al.  Socio-Political Evaluation of Energy Deployment (SPEED): An integrated research framework analyzing energy technology deployment , 2008 .

[31]  Leigh Raymond,et al.  Media Framing and Public Attitudes Toward Biofuels , 2013 .

[32]  G. Walker,et al.  Carbon reduction, 'the public' and renewable energy: engaging with socio-technical configurations. , 2007 .

[33]  P. Acharjee Strategy and implementation of Smart Grids in India , 2013 .

[34]  Tarla Rai Peterson,et al.  Getting Smart? Climate Change and the Electric Grid , 2013 .

[35]  Tarla Rai Peterson,et al.  Smart Grid Coverage in U.S. Newspapers: Characterizing Public Conversations , 2014 .

[36]  I. Ballo Imagining energy futures: Sociotechnical imaginaries of the future Smart Grid in Norway , 2015 .

[37]  M. Wolsink The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources , 2012 .

[38]  Sabine Erlinghagen,et al.  Smart grids and the transformation of the electricity sector: ICT firms as potential catalysts for sectoral change , 2012 .

[39]  Jodi Sandfort,et al.  Effective Implementation in Practice: Integrating Public Policy and Management , 2014 .

[40]  S. O'Neill Image matters: Climate change imagery in US, UK and Australian newspapers , 2013 .