Probabilistic modelling of rational communication with conditionals

While a large body of work has scrutinized the meaning of conditional sentences, considerably less attention has been paid to formal models of their pragmatic use and interpretation. Here, we take a probabilistic approach to pragmatic reasoning about indicative conditionals which flexibly integrates gradient beliefs about richly structured world states. We model listeners' update of their prior beliefs about the causal structure of the world and the joint probabilities of the consequent and antecedent based on assumptions about the speaker's utterance production protocol. We show that, when supplied with natural contextual assumptions, our model uniformly explains a number of inferences attested in the literature, including epistemic inferences, Conditional Perfection and the dependency between antecedent and consequent of a conditional. We argue that this approach also helps explain three puzzles introduced by Douven (2012) about updating with conditionals: depending on the utterance context, the listener's belief in the antecedent may increase, decrease or remain unchanged.

[1]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Knowledge and implicature: Modeling language understanding as social cognition , 2012, CogSci.

[2]  I. Douven,et al.  The Adams family , 2010, Cognition.

[3]  I. Douven,et al.  A new resolution of the Judy Benjamin problem , 2011 .

[4]  J. Earman,et al.  Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory , 1994 .

[5]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Review Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference , 2022 .

[6]  Laurence R. Horn From if to iff: Conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening , 2000 .

[7]  Philip M. Fernbach,et al.  Asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic reasoning. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Stefan Kaufmann,et al.  Causal Premise Semantics , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  Philip M. Fernbach,et al.  Neglect of Alternative Causes in Predictive but Not Diagnostic Reasoning , 2010, Psychological science.

[10]  Katrin Schulz,et al.  Conditionals, Causality and Conditional Probability , 2019, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[11]  Roni Katzir,et al.  Structurally-defined alternatives , 2007 .

[12]  Michael Franke,et al.  Quantity implicatures, exhaustive interpretation, and rational conversation , 2011 .

[13]  Franz Josef Radermacher,et al.  Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference (Judea Pearl) , 1990, SIAM Rev..

[14]  Igor Douven,et al.  Inferential Conditionals and Evidentiality , 2013, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[15]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  A Resource-Rational Approach to the Causal Frame Problem , 2015, CogSci.

[16]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Predicting Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Games , 2012, Science.

[17]  M. Franke,et al.  Complex probability expressions & higher-order uncertainty: Compositional semantics, probabilistic pragmatics & experimental data , 2019, Cognition.

[18]  S. Levinson Presumptive Meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature , 2001 .

[19]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  A rational speech-act model of projective content , 2016, CogSci.

[20]  Michael Leon Franke,et al.  Theory-driven statistical modeling for semantics and pragmatics: A case study on grammatically generated implicature readings , 2020, Language.

[21]  Daniel Lassiter,et al.  Probabilistic language in indicative and counterfactual conditionals , 2017 .

[22]  Burkhard C. Schipper,et al.  Interactive Unawareness , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[23]  Stephan Hartmann,et al.  Learning from Conditionals , 2020, Mind.

[24]  K. C. Klauer,et al.  The relevance effect and conditionals , 2016, Cognition.

[25]  Igor Douven,et al.  Learning Conditional Information , 2012 .

[26]  D. Lewis A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Chance , 1980 .

[27]  Illtyd Trethowan Causality , 1938 .

[28]  Daniel Lassiter Talking about ( quasi-) higher-order uncertainty , 2018 .

[29]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Nonliteral understanding of number words , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Michael L. Geis,et al.  On Invited Inferences , 1971 .

[31]  Jonathan Vandenburgh,et al.  Conditional learning through causal models , 2020, Synthese.

[32]  Monica A. Gates,et al.  Tiptoeing around it: Inference from absence in potentially offensive speech , 2018, CogSci.

[33]  M. Ayers Ifs and Cans , 2017 .

[34]  Gülden Ülkümen,et al.  Two dimensions of subjective uncertainty: Clues from natural language. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  Willard Van Orman Quine Elementary Logic: Revised Edition , 1980 .

[36]  Michael Franke,et al.  Pragmatic Reasoning About Unawareness , 2013, Erkenntnis.

[37]  Yo Matsumoto The conversational condition on horn scales , 1995 .

[38]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Two Causal Theories of Counterfactual Conditionals , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  M. Günther Learning Conditional and Causal Information by Jeffrey Imaging on Stalnaker Conditionals , 2017 .

[40]  Seth Yalcin,et al.  VI—Bayesian Expressivism , 2012 .

[41]  J. V. D. Auwera,et al.  Pragmatics in the last quarter century: The case of conditional perfection☆ , 1997 .

[42]  Charles Kemp,et al.  How to Grow a Mind: Statistics, Structure, and Abstraction , 2011, Science.

[43]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Formalizing the Pragmatics of Metaphor Understanding , 2014, CogSci.

[44]  Niels Skovgaard-Olsen Motivating the Relevance Approach to Conditionals , 2016 .

[45]  Robert J. Stainton,et al.  The semantics-pragmatics boundary in philosophy , 2013 .

[46]  Judith Degen,et al.  Speaker-specific adaptation to variable use of uncertainty expressions , 2019, CogSci.

[47]  Heather Burnett Signalling games, sociolinguistic variation and the construction of style , 2019, Linguistics and Philosophy.

[48]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  Probability Update: Conditioning vs. Cross-Entropy , 1997, UAI.

[49]  Christopher G. Lucas,et al.  An improved probabilistic account of counterfactual reasoning. , 2015, Psychological review.

[50]  Igor Douven How to account for the oddness of missing-link conditionals , 2015, Synthese.

[51]  H. Grice Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[52]  P Santorio,et al.  Interventions in Premise Semantics , 2016 .

[53]  Luís Moniz Pereira,et al.  On Indicative Conditionals , 2015, IWOST-1.

[54]  Michael Franke,et al.  Probabilistic pragmatics, or why Bayes’ rule is probably important for pragmatics , 2016 .

[55]  Eric Swanson,et al.  The Application of Constraint Semantics to the Language of Subjective Uncertainty , 2016, J. Philos. Log..

[56]  Robert Stalnaker A causal theory of counterfactuals , 2004 .

[57]  Michael Franke,et al.  Variations on a Bayesian Theme: Comparing Bayesian Models of Referential Reasoning , 2015 .

[58]  P. Cheng From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. , 1997 .

[59]  Michael Franke,et al.  Now That You Mention It - Awareness Dynamics in Discourse and Decisions , 2011, Language, Games, and Evolution.

[60]  Tevye R. Krynski,et al.  The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Talking with tact : Polite language as a balance between kindness and informativity , 2016 .

[62]  Henrik Singmann,et al.  Relevance and Reason Relations. , 2017, Cognitive science.

[63]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[64]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Structural Counterfactuals: A Brief Introduction , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[65]  Tracy Holloway King,et al.  Tokens of meaning : papers in honor of Lauri Karttunen , 2019 .

[66]  Mikael Olsson Conditionals , 2018, Modern C Quick Syntax Reference.

[67]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[68]  Michael Franke,et al.  Coevolution of Lexical Meaning and Pragmatic Use , 2018, Cogn. Sci..

[69]  M. Waldmann,et al.  Inferences about unobserved causes in human contingency learning , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[70]  Daniel Rothschild,et al.  Conditionals and Propositions in Semantics , 2015, J. Philos. Log..

[71]  Janneke van Wijnbergen-Huitink,et al.  Conditionals and inferential connections: A hypothetical inferential theory , 2018, Cognitive Psychology.

[72]  K. Schulz,et al.  Conditionals As Representative Inferences , 2020, Axiomathes.

[73]  H. Kyburg Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference by Judea Pearl , 1991 .

[74]  Bob Rehder,et al.  Cognitive shortcuts in causal inference , 2013, Argument Comput..

[75]  Igor Douven,et al.  Rethinking Gibbard’s Riverboat Argument , 2014, Stud Logica.

[76]  Judith Degen,et al.  When redundancy is useful: A Bayesian approach to "overinformative" referring expressions. , 2020, Psychological review.

[77]  Igor Douven,et al.  The evidential support theory of conditionals , 2007, Synthese.

[78]  M. C. Sheps,et al.  Shall we count the living of the dead. , 1958, The New England journal of medicine.

[79]  Leland Gerson Neuberg,et al.  Bayes or Bust?-A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. , 1994 .

[80]  Jean Baratgin,et al.  Centering and the meaning of conditionals , 2016, CogSci.

[81]  Katrin Schulz,et al.  Why Those Biscuits Are Relevant and on the Sideboard , 2021, Theoria.

[82]  S. Moss On the semantics and pragmatics of epistemic vocabulary , 2015 .

[83]  J. L. Austin,et al.  Ifs and Cans 1 , 1979 .