Dose distribution for gynecological brachytherapy with dose accumulation between insertions: Feasibility study.

PURPOSE For gynecological treatments, it is standard to acquire CT images and preferably also MR images before each treatment to calculate the dose of the day. The dose of the complete treatment is calculated by adding the dose metrics of each fraction. It makes the conservative assumption that the same part of the organs at risk always receives the highest dose. The dose calculated this way often limits the prescription dose or the target coverage. We investigated the use of deformable image registration (DIR) as an alternative method to assess the cumulative dose for a treatment course. METHODS AND MATERIALS Rigid registration is preformed on CT images, followed by DIR. DIR can be based either solely on the three-dimensional images or combined with organ contours. To improve DIR in the pelvic region with low CT contrast, we propose (1) using contours drawn on CT or (2) modifying artificially the contrast in certain volumes. The dose matrix from fraction_n (n > 1) is deformed using a calculated deformation field. RESULTS The use of the contrast-enhanced images or of contour information helps to guide the DIR. However, because of the very high dose gradients involved in brachytherapy, the uncertainty on the accumulated dose remains of the order of 5-10%. Even for good contour matching, a small local error in the deformation can have significant consequences for the dose distribution. CONCLUSIONS Using DIR, based on image features and contours, allows to accumulate the dose from different brachytherapy fractions. A robust validation procedure should be developed.

[1]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Experimental validation of an intrasubject elastic registration algorithm for dynamic-3D ultrasound images. , 2012, Medical physics.

[2]  J Moseley,et al.  Sliding characteristic and material compressibility of human lung: parametric study and verification. , 2009, Medical physics.

[3]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Transformation Model and Constraints Cause Bias in Statistics on Deformation Fields , 2006, MICCAI.

[4]  Adil Al-Mayah,et al.  Deformable image registration of heterogeneous human lung incorporating the bronchial tree. , 2010, Medical physics.

[5]  Luiza Bondar,et al.  A symmetric nonrigid registration method to handle large organ deformations in cervical cancer patients. , 2010, Medical physics.

[6]  Dosimetric variations due to interfraction organ deformation in cervical cancer brachytherapy. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  G S Mageras,et al.  Evaluation of deformable image registration and a motion model in CT images with limited features , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Ludvig Paul Muren,et al.  Propagation of target and organ at risk contours in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using deformable image registration , 2010, Acta oncologica.

[9]  Colin G Orton,et al.  Point/counterpoint: it is not appropriate to "deform" dose along with deformable image registration in adaptive radiotherapy. , 2012, Medical physics.

[10]  David Thwaites,et al.  The evaluation of a deformable image registration segmentation technique for semi-automating internal target volume (ITV) production from 4DCT images of lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  J. Dimopoulos,et al.  Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  M W Vannier,et al.  Image-based dose planning of intracavitary brachytherapy: registration of serial-imaging studies using deformable anatomic templates. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Neil Kirby,et al.  A two-dimensional deformable phantom for quantitatively verifying deformation algorithms. , 2011, Medical physics.

[14]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  Arjan Bel,et al.  A voxel-based finite element model for the prediction of bladder deformation. , 2011, Medical physics.

[16]  William M. Wells,et al.  Estimation of Delivered Dose in Radiotherapy: The Influence of Registration Uncertainty , 2011, MICCAI.

[17]  J. Pouliot,et al.  The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration. , 2012, Medical physics.

[18]  D L McShan,et al.  Inclusion of organ deformation in dose calculations. , 2003, Medical physics.

[19]  Maria Thor,et al.  Deformable image registration for contour propagation from CT to cone-beam CT scans in radiotherapy of prostate cancer , 2011, Acta oncologica.

[20]  Guillaume Janssens.  Registration models for tracking organs and tumors in highly deformable anatomies : applications to radiotherapy , 2010 .

[21]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[22]  Timothy E. Schultheiss,et al.  It is not appropriate to “deform” dose along with deformable image registration in adaptive radiotherapy: Point/Counterpoint , 2012 .

[23]  Lara P Bonner Millar,et al.  Assessment of cumulative external beam and intracavitary brachytherapy organ doses in gynecologic cancers using deformable dose summation. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[24]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  Morphons: Paint on Priors and Elastic Canvas for Segmentation and Registration , 2005, SCIA.

[25]  Michael Velec,et al.  A novel technique to enable experimental validation of deformable dose accumulation. , 2012, Medical physics.

[26]  J. Williamson,et al.  Update of AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: A revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations. , 2003, Medical physics.

[27]  Arjan Bel,et al.  Finite element based bladder modeling for image-guided radiotherapy of bladder cancer. , 2010, Medical physics.

[28]  M. Murphy,et al.  A method to map errors in the deformable registration of 4DCT images. , 2010, Medical physics.

[29]  Michael Velec,et al.  Accumulated dose in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy: positioning, breathing, and deformation effects. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  P. Lambin,et al.  Evaluation of nonrigid registration models for interfraction dose accumulation in radiotherapy. , 2009, Medical physics.

[31]  Karsten O. Noe,et al.  Bladder dose accumulation based on a biomechanical deformable image registration algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Kari Tanderup,et al.  Uncertainties of deformable image registration for dose accumulation of high-dose regions in bladder and rectum in locally advanced cervical cancer. , 2015, Brachytherapy.

[33]  Vladimir Pekar,et al.  Assessment of a model-based deformable image registration approach for radiation therapy planning. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[34]  Steven S. Beauchemin,et al.  The computation of optical flow , 1995, CSUR.

[35]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  ImaSim, a software tool for basic education of medical x-ray imaging in radiotherapy and radiology , 2013, Front. Physics.

[36]  Michael Velec,et al.  Effect of breathing motion on radiotherapy dose accumulation in the abdomen using deformable registration. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.