Estimating the Number of Sources in Magnetoencephalography Using Spiked Population Eigenvalues

ABSTRACT Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is an advanced imaging technique used to measure the magnetic fields outside the human head produced by the electrical activity inside the brain. Various source localization methods in MEG require the knowledge of the underlying active sources, which are identified by a priori. Common methods used to estimate the number of sources include principal component analysis or information criterion methods, both of which make use of the eigenvalue distribution of the data, thus avoiding solving the time-consuming inverse problem. Unfortunately, all these methods are very sensitive to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), as examining the sample extreme eigenvalues does not necessarily reflect the perturbation of the population ones. To uncover the unknown sources from the very noisy MEG data, we introduce a framework, referred to as the intrinsic dimensionality (ID) of the optimal transformation for the SNR rescaling functional. It is defined as the number of the spiked population eigenvalues of the associated transformed data matrix. It is shown that the ID yields a more reasonable estimate for the number of sources than its sample counterparts, especially when the SNR is small. By means of examples, we illustrate that the new method is able to capture the number of signal sources in MEG that can escape PCA or other information criterion-based methods. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

[1]  Andrea Montanari,et al.  Sparse PCA via Covariance Thresholding , 2013, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[2]  Z. Bai,et al.  METHODOLOGIES IN SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF LARGE DIMENSIONAL RANDOM MATRICES, A REVIEW , 2008 .

[3]  D. M. Schmidt,et al.  Bayesian inference applied to the electromagnetic inverse problem , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Françoise Bellegarde,et al.  Transformation Ordering , 1987, TAPSOFT, Vol.1.

[5]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[6]  Z. Bai METHODOLOGIES IN SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF LARGE DIMENSIONAL RANDOM MATRICES , A REVIEW , 1999 .

[7]  Zhigang Yao,et al.  A Statistical Approach to the Inverse Problem in Magnetoencephalography , 2014, 1401.2395.

[8]  M. Bartlett A Note on the Multiplying Factors for Various χ2 Approximations , 1954 .

[9]  S. Péché,et al.  Phase transition of the largest eigenvalue for nonnull complex sample covariance matrices , 2004, math/0403022.

[10]  Roland Potthast,et al.  Reconstruction of a current distribution from its magnetic field , 2002 .

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  MEG source localization under multiple constraints: An extended Bayesian framework , 2006, NeuroImage.

[12]  P. Bickel,et al.  Covariance regularization by thresholding , 2009, 0901.3079.

[13]  J.C. Mosher,et al.  Recursive MUSIC: A framework for EEG and MEG source localization , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  A. Tikhonov,et al.  Nonlinear Ill-Posed Problems , 1997 .

[15]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Detection of signals by information theoretic criteria , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[16]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation-Based Beamforming With MEG Neuroimaging Data , 2015 .

[17]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Somatically Evoked Magnetic Fields of the Human Brain , 1978, Science.

[18]  Edmund R. Malinowski,et al.  Determination of the number of factors and the experimental error in a data matrix , 1977 .

[19]  A. Tikhonov,et al.  Numerical Methods for the Solution of Ill-Posed Problems , 1995 .

[20]  Zhidong Bai,et al.  ESTIMATION OF SPIKED EIGENVALUES IN SPIKED MODELS , 2012 .

[21]  D. Lawley TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE LATENT ROOTS OF COVARIANCE AND CORRELATION MATRICES , 1956 .

[22]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of neural language processing: an MEG study using minimum-norm current estimates , 2003, NeuroImage.

[23]  R. Kass,et al.  Decoding and cortical source localization for intended movement direction with MEG. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  S. Vanni,et al.  Foveal attention modulates responses to peripheral stimuli. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Visualization of Magnetoencephalographic Data Using Minimum Current Estimates , 1999, NeuroImage.

[26]  J. Sarvas Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  John F. Arnold,et al.  Reliably estimating the noise in AVIRIS hyperspectral images , 1996 .

[28]  B. V. Veen,et al.  Localization of intra-cerebral sources of electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1992, [1992] IEEE Sixth SP Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing.

[29]  P. Switzer,et al.  A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal , 1988 .

[30]  Edmund R. Malinowski,et al.  Theory of error in factor analysis , 1977 .

[31]  D. Cohen Magnetoencephalography: Evidence of Magnetic Fields Produced by Alpha-Rhythm Currents , 1968, Science.

[32]  R. O. Schmidt,et al.  Multiple emitter location and signal Parameter estimation , 1986 .

[33]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .