Social Evaluation of Health Care Versus Personal Evaluation of Health States: Evidence on the Validity of Four Health-state Scaling Instruments Using Norwegian and Australian Surveys

Abstract In most of the cost-utility literature, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gains are interpreted as a measure of social value. Given this interpretation, the validity of different multi-attribute health-state scaling instruments may be tested by comparing the values they provide on the 0–1 QALY scale with directly elicited preferences for person trade-offs between different treatments (equivalence of numbers of different patients treated). Norwegian and Australian public preferences as measured by the person trade-off suggest that the EuroQol Instrument assigns excessively low values to health states. This seems to be even more true of the McMaster Health Classification System. The Quality of Well-being Scale appears to compress states toward the middle of the 0–1 scale. By contrast, the Rosser/Kind index fits reasonably well with directly measured person trade-off data.

[1]  E. Nord.  Toward Quality Assurance in QALY Calculations , 1993, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[2]  E. Nord.  Unjustified use of the Quality of Well-Being Scale in priority setting in Oregon. , 1993, Health policy.

[3]  E. Nord.  The relevance of health state after treatment in prioritising between different patients. , 1993, Journal of medical ethics.

[4]  E. Nord,et al.  Methods for quality adjustment of life years. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[5]  D M Eddy,et al.  Oregon's methods. Did cost-effectiveness analysis fail? , 1991, JAMA.

[6]  E. Nord,et al.  The validity of a visual analogue scale in determining social utility weights for health states. , 1991, The International journal of health planning and management.

[7]  E. Nord,et al.  EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Valuations of health states by the general public in Norway. , 1991, Health policy.

[8]  R. Brooks,et al.  EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Results of the Swedish questionnaire exercise. , 1991, Health policy.

[9]  D C Hadorn,et al.  Setting health care priorities in Oregon. Cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescue. , 1991, JAMA.

[10]  A. Wagstaff.  QALYs and the equity-efficiency trade-off. , 1991, Journal of health economics.

[11]  M. Garland.  Setting health care priorities in Oregon. , 1991, Health matrix.

[12]  J. Richardson.  Economic Assessment of Health Care: Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[13]  A. Mcguire,et al.  Providing health care : the economics of alternative systems of finance and delivery , 1991 .

[14]  S. Westaby,et al.  Trauma centres and the efficient use of financial resources , 1990, The British journal of surgery.

[15]  G. Smith.  The economics of hypertension and stroke. , 1990, American heart journal.

[16]  A. Williams.  EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[17]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Valuation of health states by the general public: feasibility of a standardized measurement procedure. , 1990, Social science & medicine.

[18]  A. Kasuya.  EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. , 1990, Health policy.

[19]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Statistics with confidence: Confidence intervals and statistical guidelines . , 1990 .

[20]  A. Mulley,et al.  Assessing Patients' Utilities: Can the Ends Justify the Means? , 1989, Medical care.

[21]  G. Loomes,et al.  The use of QALYs in health care decision making. , 1989, Social science & medicine.

[22]  R M Kaplan,et al.  A general health policy model: update and applications. , 1988, Health services research.

[23]  S. Wilson.  Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes , 1987 .

[24]  T. Pinch,et al.  Measuring the Quality of Life: A Sociological Invention Concerning the Application of Economics to Health Care , 1987 .

[25]  A. Williams.  Who is to live? A question for the economist or the doctor? , 1987, World hospitals.

[26]  J. Harris.  QALYfying the value of life. , 1987, Journal of medical ethics.

[27]  G. Torrance.  Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. , 1986, Journal of health economics.

[28]  R. Jarrett,et al.  Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting , 1985, British medical journal.

[29]  George W. Torrance,et al.  Application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory to Measure Social Preferences for Health States , 1982, Oper. Res..

[30]  P. Kind,et al.  A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus? , 1978, International journal of epidemiology.

[31]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  George W. Torrance,et al.  Social preferences for health states: An empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques , 1976 .

[33]  J. Rawls,et al.  A Theory of Justice , 1971, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[34]  L. Lykken.  Can the ends justify the means? , 1968, Science.