How Much Assistance Is Helpful to Students in Discovery Learning?

How much help helps in discovery learning? This question is one instance of the assistance dilemma , an important issue in the learning sciences and educational technology research. To explore this question, we conducted a study involving 87 college students solving problems in a virtual chemistry laboratory (VLab), testing three points along an assistance continuum: (1) a minimal assistance, inquiry-learning approach, in which students used the VLab with no hints and minimal feedback; (2) a mid-level assistance, tutored approach, in which students received intelligent tutoring hints and feedback while using the VLab (i.e., help given on request and feedback on incorrect steps); and (3) a high assistance, direct-instruction approach, in which students were coaxed to follow a specific set of steps in the VLab. Although there was no difference in learning results between conditions on near transfer posttest questions, students in the tutored condition did significantly better on conceptual posttest questions than students in the other two conditions. Furthermore, the more advanced students in the tutored condition, those who performed better on a pretest, did significantly better on the conceptual posttest than their counterparts in the other two conditions. Thus, it appears that students in the tutored condition had just the right amount of assistance, and that the better students in that condition used their superior metacognitive skills and/or motivation to decide when to use the available assistance to their best advantage.

[1]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  A New Paradigm for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Example-Tracing Tutors , 2009, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[2]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[3]  L. Steffe,et al.  Constructivism in education. , 1995 .

[4]  D. Jonassen.  Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? , 1991 .

[5]  Michael Karabinos,et al.  Scenes and Labs Supporting Online Chemistry , 2003 .

[6]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[7]  K. Koedinger,et al.  Exploring the Assistance Dilemma in Experiments with Cognitive Tutors , 2007 .

[8]  M. Pope.  The Art of Discovery. , 2000 .

[9]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Is it better to give than to receive? The assistance dilemma as a fundamental unsolved problem in the cognitive science of learning and instruction , 2008 .

[10]  Cornelia S. Große,et al.  How Fading Worked Solution Steps Works – A Cognitive Load Perspective , 2004 .

[11]  K. Koedinger,et al.  Example-Tracing Tutors : A New Paradigm for Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2008 .

[12]  R. Mayer.  Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[13]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[14]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[15]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  The Behavior of Tutoring Systems , 2006, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[16]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  When and how often should worked examples be given to students? New results and a summary of the current state of research , 2008 .

[17]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions , 1977 .

[18]  R. Tamblyn,et al.  Problem-based learning : an approach to medical education , 1980 .

[19]  Milena K. Nigam,et al.  The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science Instruction: Effects of Direct Instruction and Discovery Learning , 2022 .

[20]  David Yaron,et al.  Using Simulations to Transform the Nature of Chemistry Homework , 2000 .

[21]  J. Bruner.  The act of discovery. , 1961 .