Governing for sustainable energy system change : politics, contexts and contingency

This paper offers a new, interdisciplinary framework for the analysis of governing for sustainable energy system change by drawing together insights from, and offering critiques of, socio-technical transitions and new institutionalist concepts of change. Institutions of all kinds, including rules and norms within political and energy systems, tend to have path-dependent qualities that make them difficult to change, whereas we also know that profound change has occurred in the past. Current decisions to pursue climate change mitigation by dramatically changing how energy is produced and used depend to some extent on finding the right enabling conditions for such change. The approach adopted here reveals the highly political and contingent nature of attempts to govern for innovations, how political institutions mediate differently between forces for sustainable change and forces for continuity, as well as specific interactions between governance and practice change within energy systems. It concludes that it is only by being specific about the contingent nature of governing for innovations, and about how this affects practices in energy systems differently, that those of us interested in sustainability can credibly advise policy makers and drive for greater change.

[1]  C. Hay.  Narrating Crisis: The Discursive Construction of the `Winter of Discontent' , 1996 .

[2]  S. Strange.  States and markets , 1988 .

[3]  K. Araújo.  The emerging field of energy transitions: Progress, challenges, and opportunities , 2014 .

[4]  D. Helm.  The Assessment: The New Energy Paradigm , 2005 .

[5]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[6]  Arie Rip,et al.  Constructing Transition Paths Through the Management of Niches , 2001 .

[7]  Timothy DiMuzio.  Capitalizing a future unsustainable: Finance, energy and the fate of market civilization , 2012 .

[8]  C. Crouch.  Models of capitalism , 2005 .

[9]  Peter Newell,et al.  Climate capitalism: global warming and the transformation of the global economy , 2011 .

[10]  Michael Jacobs,et al.  EXPLAINING RADICAL POLICY CHANGE: THE CASE OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY POLICY UNDER THE BRITISH LABOUR GOVERNMENT 2006–10 , 2014 .

[11]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Climate Change 2014 , 2015 .

[12]  Mark Blyth,et al.  Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century , 2002 .

[13]  John L. Campbell.  Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy , 1998 .

[14]  Rob Raven,et al.  What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability , 2012 .

[15]  F. Geels.  Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective , 2010 .

[16]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work. A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases , 2016 .

[17]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[18]  J. Meadowcroft.  Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions , 2011 .

[19]  B. Truffer,et al.  The impact of privatization on sustainability transitions: A comparative analysis of dynamic capabilities in three water utilities , 2015 .

[20]  Markus M. L. Crepaz.  Inclusion versus Exclusion: Political Institutions and Welfare Expenditures , 1998 .

[21]  E. Lachapelle,et al.  Drivers of national climate policy , 2013 .

[22]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[23]  Gregory C. Unruh.  Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[24]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[25]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[26]  John L. Campbell,et al.  Policy ideas, knowledge regimes and comparative political economy , 2015 .

[27]  Till Stenzel,et al.  Regulating technological change—The strategic reactions of utility companies towards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish and UK electricity markets , 2008 .

[28]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  The political economy of sustainable energy , 2007 .

[29]  V. Berghahn,et al.  Reflections on Werner Bonefeld's ‘Freedom and the Strong State: On German Ordoliberalism' and the Continuing Importance of the Ideas of Ordoliberalism to Understand Germany's (Contested) Role in Resolving the Eurozone Crisis , 2013 .

[30]  Rhona K. M. Smith,et al.  Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union , 2015 .

[31]  A. Schaffrin,et al.  The innovativeness of national policy portfolios – climate policy change in Austria, Germany, and the UK , 2014 .

[32]  C. Pérez.  Technological revolutions and financial capital : the dynamics of bubbles and golden ages , 2003 .

[33]  G. Kungl,et al.  Adaptive capacities, path creation and variants of sectoral change: The case of the transformation of the German energy supply system , 2012 .

[34]  A. Hadfield.  Energy and foreign policy: EU-Russia energy dynamics , 2008 .

[35]  F. Geels.  Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective , 2014 .

[36]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[37]  V. Lauber,et al.  Anglo-Saxon and German approaches to neoliberalism and environmental policy: The case of financing renewable energy , 2007 .

[38]  Nick Eyre,et al.  Demanding Less:Why we need a new politics of energy , 2011 .

[39]  M. Schreurs.  The politics of phase-out , 2012 .

[40]  Michael Howlett,et al.  Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector , 2009 .

[41]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  Environmental political economy, technological transitions and the state , 2005 .

[42]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life , 2010 .

[43]  Introduction: Climate Policy is Energy Policy , 2009 .

[44]  T. Foxon.  A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy , 2011 .

[45]  Sheri Berman.  The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe , 1998 .

[46]  F. Geels,et al.  Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: Lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913–1997) , 2012 .

[47]  A. Evrard.  Political Parties and Policy Change: Explaining the Impact of French and German Greens on Energy Policy , 2012 .

[48]  E. Shove,et al.  Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management , 2007 .

[49]  A. Giddens.  The Politics of Climate Change , 2009 .

[50]  F. Fischer.  Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices , 2003 .

[51]  Roger Fouquet,et al.  The slow search for solutions: lessons from historical energy transitions by sector and service , 2010 .

[52]  C. Hay.  Ideas, interests and institutions in the comparative political economy of great transformations , 2004 .

[53]  J. Mikler,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism and Technological Innovation for Climate Change Mitigation , 2012 .

[54]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[55]  P. Hall,et al.  Institutional change in varieties of capitalism , 2008 .

[56]  B. Sovacool.  What Are We Doing Here? Analyzing Fifteen Years of Energy Scholarship and Proposing a Social Science Research Agenda , 2014 .

[57]  V. Schmidt.  The Futures of European Capitalism , 2002 .

[58]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Measuring and explaining policy paradigm change: the case of UK energy policy , 2014 .

[59]  A. Stirling.  Emancipating transformation: from controlling ‘the transition’ to culturing plural radical progress , 2015 .

[60]  M. Lockwood.  The political dynamics of green transformations: feedback and institutional context , 2015 .

[61]  M. Murphy.  Interests, institutions and ideas: explaining Irish social security policy , 2012 .

[62]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2006 .

[63]  P. Hall.  Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain , 1993 .

[64]  J. Mahoney,et al.  A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change , 2010 .

[65]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Lobbying the ‘Energiewende’. Assessing the effectiveness of strategies to promote the renewable energy business in Germany , 2014 .

[66]  P. Hall,et al.  Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms , 1996 .

[67]  André Månsson,et al.  Energy, conflict and war: Towards a conceptual framework , 2014 .

[68]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[69]  Caroline Julian,et al.  Creating Local Energy Economies: Lessons from Germany , 2014 .

[70]  V. Schmidt.  Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’ , 2010, European Political Science Review.

[71]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[72]  Karin Ericsson,et al.  Low-carbon district heating in Sweden – Examining a successful energy transition , 2014 .

[73]  Jens Weinmann,et al.  Germany's Decentralized Energy Revolution , 2014 .

[74]  D. Soskice,et al.  Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others , 2006, American Political Science Review.

[75]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The (non-)politics of managing low carbon socio-technical transitions , 2009 .