Structurally distinct ubiquitin- and sumo-modified PCNA: implications for their distinct roles in the DNA damage response.

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is a pivotal replication protein, which also controls cellular responses to DNA damage. Posttranslational modification of PCNA by SUMO and ubiquitin modulate these responses. How the modifiers alter PCNA-dependent DNA repair and damage tolerance pathways is largely unknown. We used hybrid methods to identify atomic models of PCNAK107-Ub and PCNAK164-SUMO consistent with small-angle X-ray scattering data of these complexes in solution. We show that SUMO and ubiquitin have distinct modes of association to PCNA. Ubiquitin adopts discrete docked binding positions. By contrast, SUMO associates by simple tethering and adopts extended flexible conformations. These structural differences are the result of the opposite electrostatic potentials of SUMO and Ub. The unexpected contrast in conformational behavior of Ub-PCNA and SUMO-PCNA has implications for interactions with partner proteins, interacting surfaces accessibility, and access points for pathway regulation.

[1]  Fumio Hanaoka,et al.  Crystal structure of thymine DNA glycosylase conjugated to SUMO-1 , 2005, Nature.

[2]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[3]  Andrej Sali,et al.  FoXS: a web server for rapid computation and fitting of SAXS profiles , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  S. Jentsch,et al.  PCNA, the Maestro of the Replication Fork , 2007, Cell.

[5]  Philipp Stelter,et al.  Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation , 2003, Nature.

[6]  Z. Kelman PCNA: structure, functions and interactions , 1997, Oncogene.

[7]  John A. Tainer,et al.  Implementation and performance of SIBYLS: a dual endstation small-angle X-ray scattering and macromolecular crystallography beamline at the Advanced Light Source , 2013, Journal of applied crystallography.

[8]  John A Tainer,et al.  Bridging the solution divide: comprehensive structural analyses of dynamic RNA, DNA, and protein assemblies by small-angle X-ray scattering. , 2010, Current opinion in structural biology.

[9]  C. Lima,et al.  Recognition of SUMO-modified PCNA requires tandem receptor motifs in Srs2 , 2012, Nature.

[10]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[11]  D. Baker,et al.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  J. Parker,et al.  A SUMO-interacting motif activates budding yeast ubiquitin ligase Rad18 towards SUMO-modified PCNA , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  Zhihao Zhuang,et al.  Regulatory role of ubiquitin in eukaryotic DNA translesion synthesis. , 2013, Biochemistry.

[14]  Jens Meiler,et al.  ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. , 2011, Methods in enzymology.

[15]  G. Maga,et al.  Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a dancer with many partners , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[16]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Proliferating cell nuclear antigen loaded onto double-stranded DNA: dynamics, minor groove interactions and functional implications , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  Linda Hicke,et al.  Ubiquitin and proteasomes: Protein regulation by monoubiquitin , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[18]  P. Burgers,et al.  A mutational analysis of the yeast proliferating cell nuclear antigen indicates distinct roles in DNA replication and DNA repair , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[19]  Michal Hammel,et al.  Validation of macromolecular flexibility in solution by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) , 2012, European Biophysics Journal.

[20]  Elizabeth N. Koch,et al.  Unligated Okazaki Fragments Induce PCNA Ubiquitination and a Requirement for Rad59-Dependent Replication Fork Progression , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  Ying Li,et al.  DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament , 2003, Nature.

[22]  P. Russell,et al.  ATP‐driven Rad50 conformations regulate DNA tethering, end resection, and ATM checkpoint signaling , 2014, The EMBO journal.

[23]  Mark E. Tuckerman,et al.  Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics , 1992 .

[24]  A. Bielinsky,et al.  Defects in DNA Ligase I Trigger PCNA Ubiquitination at Lysine 107 , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[25]  Laxmikant V. Kale,et al.  NAMD2: Greater Scalability for Parallel Molecular Dynamics , 1999 .

[26]  Adam W Van Wynsberghe,et al.  Solution X-ray scattering combined with computational modeling reveals multiple conformations of covalently bound ubiquitin on PCNA , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  John A. Tainer,et al.  X-ray solution scattering (SAXS) combined with crystallography and computation: defining accurate macromolecular structures, conformations and assemblies in solution , 2007, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[28]  H. Ulrich Ubiquitin and SUMO in DNA repair at a glance , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[29]  G. Wider,et al.  Ubiquitin-Binding Domains in Y-Family Polymerases Regulate Translesion Synthesis , 2005, Science.

[30]  John A Tainer,et al.  A SIM-ultaneous role for SUMO and ubiquitin. , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[31]  Zhihao Zhuang,et al.  Chemically ubiquitylated PCNA as a probe for eukaryotic translesion DNA synthesis. , 2010, Nature chemical biology.

[32]  John A Tainer,et al.  Characterizing flexible and intrinsically unstructured biological macromolecules by SAS using the Porod-Debye law. , 2011, Biopolymers.

[33]  John A Tainer,et al.  Accurate SAXS profile computation and its assessment by contrast variation experiments. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Steven M. Lewis,et al.  Essential role for ubiquitin-ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme interaction in ubiquitin discharge from Cdc34 to substrate. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[35]  C. Bugg,et al.  Structure of ubiquitin refined at 1.8 A resolution. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  F. Fabre,et al.  The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments , 2003, Nature.

[37]  John A. Tainer,et al.  Software for the high-throughput collection of SAXS data using an enhanced Blu-Ice/DCS control system , 2010, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[38]  T. Helleday,et al.  PCNA on the crossroad of cancer. , 2009, Biochemical Society transactions.

[39]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[40]  Steven M. Lewis,et al.  Site–Specific Monoubiquitination Activates Ras by Impeding GTPase Activating Protein Function , 2012, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[41]  M. Washington,et al.  Structure of Monoubiquitinated PCNA and Implications for Translesion Synthesis and DNA Polymerase Exchange , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[42]  Z. Jónsson,et al.  Proliferating cell nuclear antigen: More than a clamp for DNA polymerases , 1997, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[43]  Samie R Jaffrey,et al.  Global analysis of lysine ubiquitination by ubiquitin remnant immunoaffinity profiling , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  Boris Pfander,et al.  RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO , 2002, Nature.

[45]  S. Gangloff,et al.  Srs2 mediates PCNA-SUMO-dependent inhibition of DNA repair synthesis , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[46]  Greg L. Hura,et al.  Structure and flexibility within proteins as identified through small angle X-ray scattering. , 2009, General physiology and biophysics.

[47]  John Kuriyan,et al.  Crystal structure of the eukaryotic DNA polymerase processivity factor PCNA , 1994, Cell.

[48]  Efterpi Papouli,et al.  Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[49]  P. Schär,et al.  Functionality of Human Thymine DNA Glycosylase Requires SUMO-Regulated Changes in Protein Conformation , 2005, Current Biology.

[50]  David Baker,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction Using Rosetta , 2004, Numerical Computer Methods, Part D.

[51]  H. Ulrich Mutual interactions between the SUMO and ubiquitin systems: a plea of no contest. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[52]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[53]  John A. Tainer,et al.  Accurate assessment of mass, models and resolution by small-angle scattering , 2013, Nature.

[54]  John A. Tainer,et al.  Robust, high-throughput solution structural analyses by small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) , 2009, Nature Methods.

[55]  B. D. Freudenthal,et al.  Crystal structure of SUMO-modified proliferating cell nuclear antigen. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[56]  J. Tainer,et al.  Methods for using new conceptual tools and parameters to assess RNA structure by small-angle X-ray scattering. , 2014, Methods in enzymology.

[57]  H. Walden,et al.  Ubiquitin signalling in DNA replication and repair , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[58]  Boris Pfander,et al.  SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase , 2005, Nature.

[59]  C. Lawrence,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae rev6-1 Mutation, Which Inhibits Both the Lesion Bypass and the Recombination Mode of DNA Damage Tolerance, Is an Allele of POL30, Encoding Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen , 2006, Genetics.

[60]  Sebastian A. Wagner,et al.  Systems-wide analysis of ubiquitylation dynamics reveals a key role for PAF15 ubiquitylation in DNA-damage bypass , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[61]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[62]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[63]  P. Vachette,et al.  NADPH oxidase activator p67(phox) behaves in solution as a multidomain protein with semi-flexible linkers. , 2010, Journal of structural biology.