Understanding the nature of science and scientific progress: A theory-building approach

In 1993 Carey and Smith conjectured that the most promising way to boost students’ understanding of the nature of science is a “theory-building approach to teaching about inquiry.” The research reported here tested this conjecture by comparing results from two Grade 4 classrooms that differed in their emphasis on and technological support for creating and improving theories. One class followed a Knowledge Building approach and used Knowledge Forum®, which together emphasize theory improvement and sustained creative work with ideas. The other class followed an inquiry approach mediated through collaborative project-based activities. Apart from this, the two classes were demographically similar and both fell within the broad category of constructivist, inquiry-based approaches and employed a range of modes and media for investigative research and reports. An augmented version of Carey and Smith’s Nature of Science Interview showed that the Knowledge Building approach resulted in deeper understanding of the nature of theoretical progress, the connections between theories and facts, and the role of ideas in scientific inquiry.

[1]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[2]  David Klahr,et al.  Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[4]  E. Soloway,et al.  Enacting Project-Based Science , 1997, The Elementary School Journal.

[5]  Panayota Mantzicopoulos,et al.  Motivation for learning science in kindergarten: Is there a gender gap and does integrated inquiry and literacy instruction make a difference , 2009 .

[6]  William S. Harris,et al.  Intelligent Design: The Scientific Alternative to Evolution , 2003 .

[7]  MISSING-VALUE MISSING-VALUE,et al.  Knowledge Building , 2017 .

[8]  George E. DeBoer,et al.  Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform , 2000 .

[9]  R. Sawyer.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .

[10]  M. Lamon,et al.  Partnerships for Knowledge Building: An Emerging Model , 2010 .

[11]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science , 2000 .

[12]  Sarah Ellen Ransdell,et al.  Working memory constraints on writing quality and fluency. , 2013 .

[13]  Susan Carey,et al.  `An experiment is when you try it and see if it works': a study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge , 1989 .

[14]  Lella Gandini,et al.  The Hundred Languages of Children: The Reggio Emilia Approach to Early Childhood Education , 1993 .

[15]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Teaching How Science Really Works. , 2009 .

[16]  Sophia Catsambis,et al.  Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades , 1995 .

[17]  L. Schauble,et al.  Cross-Domain Development of Scientific Reasoning , 1992 .

[18]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Science and the “Good Citizen”: Community-Based Scientific Literacy , 2003 .

[19]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Postmodernism, Knowledge Building, and Elementary Science , 1997, The Elementary School Journal.

[20]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Students' Perceptions of Tentativeness in Science: Development, Use, and Sources of Change. , 1990 .

[21]  Kathleen E. Metz.  Children's Understanding of Scientific Inquiry: Their Conceptualization of Uncertainty in Investigations of Their Own Design , 2004 .

[22]  D. Hodson.  Time for action: Science education for an alternative future , 2003 .

[23]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. , 1994 .

[24]  Stephen J. Farenga,et al.  Intentions of Young Students to Enroll in Science Courses in the Future: An Examination of Gender Differences. , 1999 .

[25]  N. Reid,et al.  Gender and physics , 2003 .

[26]  A. Collins.  National Science Education Standards: A Political Document. , 1998 .

[27]  M. Scardamalia.  Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge , 2002 .

[28]  P. Thagard,et al.  Explanatory coherence , 1993 .

[29]  Huang-Yao Hong,et al.  Making thinking visible: growth in graphical literacy, grades 3 to 4 , 2007, CSCL.

[30]  Thad Dunning,et al.  Improving Causal Inference , 2008 .

[31]  Maya Honda.  Linguistic inquiry in the science classroom : "It is science, but it's not like a science problem in a book" , 1994 .

[32]  Barbara J. Guzzetti,et al.  Changing the Pattern of Gendered Discussion: Lessons from Science Classrooms. , 1996 .

[33]  Susan Carey,et al.  On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge , 1993 .

[34]  Susan Carey,et al.  "An Experiment Is When You Try It and See if It Works": A Study of Junior High School Students' Understanding of the Construction of Scientific Knowledge. , 1988 .

[35]  Jianwei Zhang,et al.  Triple scheme of learning support design for scientific discovery learning based on computer simulation: experimental research , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[36]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Designs for Collective Cognitive Responsibility in Knowledge-Building Communities , 2009 .

[37]  C. Bereiter,et al.  Liberal education in a knowledge society , 2002 .

[38]  R. Hackett.  Young People's Images of Science , 1996 .

[39]  L. Katz,et al.  Engaging Children's Minds: The Project Approach , 1989 .

[40]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  A Brief History of Knowledge Building , 2010 .

[41]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Can Children Really Create Knowledge , 2010 .

[42]  Laura Wenk,et al.  Relations among three aspects of first-year college students' epistemologies of science , 2006 .

[43]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology , 2006 .

[44]  R. C. Laugksch.  Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview , 2000 .

[45]  M. Gertrude Hennessey,et al.  Sixth-Grade Students' Epistemologies of Science: The Impact of School Science Experiences on Epistemological Development , 2000 .

[46]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Coherence, Truth, and the Development of Scientific Knowledge* , 2007, Philosophy of Science.

[47]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds , 2007 .

[48]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Students' Understanding of the Objectives and Procedures of Experimentation in the Science Classroom , 1995 .

[49]  Ruth Beatty,et al.  Knowledge Building and Mathematics: Shifting the Responsibility for Knowledge Advancement and Engagement , 2010 .

[50]  Rodger W. Bybee.  Scientific Literacy, Environmental Issues, and PISA 2006: The 2008 Paul F-Brandwein Lecture , 2008 .