University Technology Transfer in China: How Effective are National Centers?

Abstract University–industry technology transfer is growing at a rapid rate in China, involving both multinational and domestic companies. This chapter describes unique characteristics of Chinese National Technology Transfer Centers (NTTCs) and examines whether they can function as an effective policy instrument in promoting the commercialization of university research findings. Our qualitative and quantitative study finds that NTTCs are not by themselves an effective policy tool in accelerating the commercialization of university inventions. We found that universities without NTTCs can achieve the same or even greater success than those with NTTCs. We suggest that Chinese universities should mimic the Western approach by providing an attractive reward system and autonomy to technology management programs that stimulate their efforts in marketing patented technology.

[1]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[2]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Generating science-based growth: an econometric analysis of the impact of organizational incentives on university–industry technology transfer , 2005 .

[3]  Sukanya Kemp,et al.  Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing , 2002 .

[4]  David V. Gibson,et al.  BTP—Best Transfer Practices. A tool for qualitative analysis of tech-transfer offices: A cross cultural analysis , 2013 .

[5]  Joseph Friedman,et al.  University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter? , 2003 .

[6]  R. Veugelers,et al.  Licensing of University Inventions: The Role of a Technology Transfer Office , 2007 .

[7]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer , 2005 .

[8]  Olivier Debande,et al.  Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis , 2010 .

[9]  Peter T. Gianiodis,et al.  Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market , 2005 .

[10]  Qiang Xu.  The emerging public technological platforms in China: comparing with R&D consortia in Japan and USA , 2010 .

[11]  D. Trune,et al.  University Technology Transfer Programs: A Profit/Loss Analysis , 1998 .

[12]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[13]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: 'The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with' , 2003 .

[14]  A. Link,et al.  Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration , 2003 .

[15]  R. Lowe,et al.  Who Develops a University Invention? The Impact of Tacit Knowledge and Licensing Policies , 2006 .

[16]  Mike Wright,et al.  Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence , 2005 .

[17]  T. Daim,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer , 2007 .

[18]  M. Wright,et al.  Research and Technology Commercialization , 2008 .

[19]  Jerry Thursby,et al.  An Analysis of Productive Efficiency of University Commercialization Activities , 1998 .

[20]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities , 2001 .

[21]  Xue.  Universities in China ’ s National Innovation System , .