The effect of poly(ethylene glycol) molecular architecture on cellular interaction and uptake of DNA complexes.

The cellular uptake of plasmid DNA complexes with a series of tertiary amine methacrylate-ethylene glycol (DMAEMA-EG) copolymers with various architectures was studied using flow cytofluorometry and laser confocal microscopy. The complexes displayed different rates and extents of cellular interaction and internalisation, depending on the copolymer molecular architecture. In general, introduction of oligo(ethylene glycol) [OEG] or poly(ethylene glycol) [PEG] chains decreased both the interaction and cellular internalisation of the DNA complexes but subtle differences were observed. Two block copolymers, a 'bottle-brush' type DMAEMA-block-OEGMA and a linear DMAEMA-block-PEG copolymer (each containing a total of 45 EG units), displayed similar uptake profiles. In contrast, only relatively low uptake of complexes formed by a comb-type statistical copolymer, DMAEMA-stat-PEGMA, was observed, despite each PEG chain comprising 45 EG units. Similar trends were observed with three cell lines, A549, HepG2 and COS-7. However, the absolute values were cell-dependent, with COS-7 cells displaying both the highest rate and extent of uptake. Studies of the association and uptake of the complexes demonstrated that cell associations generally increased over time, with the uptake level and the time profile depending on the polymer architecture. Confocal microscopy studies confirmed that, with the exception of the poorly transfecting comb-type copolymer, the association of complexes with cells resulted in endocytosis.

[1]  A. Kabanov,et al.  Block and Graft Copolymers and Nanogel™ Copolymer Networks for DNA Delivery into Cell , 2000, Journal of drug targeting.

[2]  E. Wagner,et al.  Tumor targeting with surface-shielded ligand--polycation DNA complexes. , 2001, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[3]  S. Armes,et al.  Effect of polymer ionization on the interaction with DNA in nonviral gene delivery systems. , 2003, Biomacromolecules.

[4]  K. Ulbrich,et al.  Novel vectors for gene delivery formed by self-assembly of DNA with poly(L-lysine) grafted with hydrophilic polymers. , 1998, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[5]  W. Hennink,et al.  Relation between transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity of poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate)/plasmid complexes , 1997 .

[6]  F. Cohen,et al.  A combinatorial approach to the discovery of efficient cationic peptoid reagents for gene delivery. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  V. Alakhov,et al.  Enhancement of the polycation‐mediated DNA uptake and cell transfection with Pluronic P85 block copolymer , 1996, FEBS letters.

[8]  J. Behr,et al.  Optimized galenics improve in vitro gene transfer with cationic molecules up to 1000-fold. , 1996, Gene therapy.

[9]  W. Hennink,et al.  The effect of formulation parameters on the size of poly-((2-dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate)-plasmid complexes. , 1999, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[10]  S. Armes,et al.  Influence of polymer architecture on the structure of complexes formed by PEG-tertiary amine methacrylate copolymers and phosphorothioate oligonucleotide. , 2002, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[11]  S. Davis,et al.  The effect of surface coverage and conformation of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) chains of poloxamer 407 on the biological fate of model colloidal drug carriers. , 2001, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[12]  M. M. Bradford A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. , 1976, Analytical biochemistry.

[13]  A. Kabanov,et al.  Evaluation of polyether-polyethyleneimine graft copolymers as gene transfer agents , 2000, Gene Therapy.

[14]  S. Armes,et al.  Copolymers of amine methacrylate with poly(ethylene glycol) as vectors for gene therapy. , 2001, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[15]  W. Hennink,et al.  Effects of Physicochemical Characteristics of Poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate)-Based Polyplexes on Cellular Association and Internalization , 2000, Journal of drug targeting.

[16]  S. Davis,et al.  Development of multicomponent DNA delivery systems based upon poly(amidoamine)-PEG co-polymers. , 2002, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[17]  W. Hennink,et al.  Effect of Size and Serum Proteins on Transfection Efficiency of Poly ((2-dimethylamino)ethyl Methacrylate)-Plasmid Nanoparticles , 1996, Pharmaceutical Research.

[18]  F. Liu,et al.  Polyethylene glycol-grafted poly-L-lysine as polymeric gene carrier. , 1998, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[19]  K. Ulbrich,et al.  Formation of DNA complexes with diblock copolymers of poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide) and polycations , 1998 .

[20]  D. Scherman,et al.  Synthesis, activity, and structure--activity relationship studies of novel cationic lipids for DNA transfer. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[21]  P. Steinlein,et al.  A versatile assay to study cellular uptake of gene transfer complexes by flow cytometry. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[22]  D. Escande,et al.  Polyethylenimine but Not Cationic Lipids Promotes Transgene Delivery to the Nucleus in Mammalian Cells* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  Clive J Roberts,et al.  Polyethylenimine-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) copolymers: influence of copolymer block structure on DNA complexation and biological activities as gene delivery system. , 2002, Bioconjugate chemistry.