Multiple parallel access in visual attention.

It is widely accepted that there exists a region or locus of maximal resource allocation in visual perception--sometimes referred to as the spotlight of attention. We have argued that even if there is a single locus of processing, there must be multiple loci of parallel access--several places in the visual field must be indexed at once and these indexes can be used to determine where attention is allocated. We have carried out a variety of studies to support these ideas, including experiments showing that subjects can track multiple independent moving targets in a field of identical distractors, that the enhanced ability to detect changes occurring on these targets does not accrue to nontargets nor to items lying inside the convex polygon that they form (so that a zoom-lens of attention does not fit the data). We have used a visual search paradigm to show that (serial or parallel) search can be confined to a subset of indexed items and the layout of these items is of little importance. We have also studied the phenomenon known as subitizing and have shown that subitizing occurs only when items can be preattentively individuated and in those cases location precuing has little effect, compared with when counting occurs, which suggests that subitizing may be carried out by counting active indexes rather than items in the visual field. And finally we have run studies showing that a certain motion effect that is sensitive to attention can occur at multiple precued loci. We believe that this evidence suggests that there is an early preattentive stage in vision where a small number of salient items in the visual field are indexed and thereby made readily accessible for a variety of visual tasks.

[1]  H. L. Mansel,et al.  Lectures on metaphysics and logic , 1859 .

[2]  H. L. Mansel,et al.  Lectures on metaphysics and logic, Vol 1: Metaphysics. , 2022 .

[3]  W. STANLEY JEVONS,et al.  The Power of Numerical Discrimination , 1871, Nature.

[4]  Howard C. Warren,et al.  The reaction time of counting. , 1897 .

[5]  W. S. Hunter,et al.  The span of visual discrimination as a function of time and intensity of stimulation. , 1940 .

[6]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Reaction time as a measure of span of attention. , 1948, The Journal of psychology.

[7]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[8]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[9]  F. Campbell,et al.  The Magic Number 4 ± 0: A New Look at Visual Numerosity Judgements , 1976, Perception.

[10]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  P. G. Vos,et al.  A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  G. Mandler,et al.  Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  A Treisman,et al.  Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  D. Homa,et al.  Sensitization of the visual field. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  S. Ullman Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.

[16]  A. Treisman Preattentive processing in vision , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[17]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  S. Ullman,et al.  Curve tracing: A possible basic operation in the perception of spatial relations , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[19]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of “neutral” cues , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  R W Frick The homogeneity effect in counting , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[22]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Z. Pylyshyn The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model , 1989, Cognition.

[24]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  S. Yantis Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  William C. Schmidt,et al.  Multiple abrupt onset cues produce illusory line motion , 1993 .

[29]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.