Unsedated ultrathin upper endoscopy is better than conventional endoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: a randomized trial.

AIM to compare the feasibility and patients' tolerance of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) using a thin endoscope with those of conventional oral EGD and to determine the optimal route of introduction of small-caliber endoscopes. METHODS One hundred and sixty outpatients referred for diagnostic EGD were randomly allocated to 3 groups: conventional (C)-EGD (9.8 mm in diameter), transnasal (TN)-EGD and transoral (TO)-EGD (5.9 mm in diameter). Pre-EGD anxiety was measured using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). After EGD, patients and endoscopists completed a questionnaire on the pain, nausea, choking, overall discomfort, and quality of the examination either using VAS or answering some questions. The duration of EGD was timed. Blood oxygen saturation (SaO2) and heart rate (HR) were monitored during EGD. RESULTS Twenty-one patients refused to participate in the study. The 3 groups were well-matched for age, gender, experience with EGD, and anxiety. EGD was completed in 91.1% (41/45), 97.5% (40/41), and 96.2% (51/53) of cases in TN-EGD, TO-EGD, and C-EGD groups, respectively. TN-EGD lasted longer (3.11 +/- 1.60 min) than TO-EGD (2.25 +/- 1.45 min) and C-EGD (2.49 +/- 1.64 min) (P<0.05). The overall tolerance was higher (P<0.05) and the overall discomfort was lower (P<0.05) in TN-EGD group than in C-EGD group. EGD was tolerated "better than expected" in 73.2% of patients in TN-EGD group and 55% and 39.2% of patients in TO-EGD and C-EGD groups, respectively (P<0.05). Endoscopy was tolerated "worst than expected" in 4.9% of patients in TN-EGD group and 17.5% and 23.5% of patients in TO-EGD and C-EGD groups, respectively (P<0.05). TN-EGD caused mild epistaxis in one case. The ability to insufflate air, wash the lens, and suction of the thin endoscope were lower than those of conventional instrument (P<0.001). All biopsies performed were adequate for histological assessment. CONCLUSION Diagnostic TN-EGD is better tolerated than C-EGD. Narrow-diameter endoscope has a level of diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of conventional gastroscope, even though some technical characteristics of these instruments should be improved. Transnasal EGD with narrow-diameter endoscope should be proposed to all patients undergoing diagnostic EGD.

[1]  W. Townsend,et al.  Unsedated transnasal EGD: an alternative approach to conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for documenting Helicobacter pylori eradication. , 1999, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[2]  R. Shaker.  Unsedated trans-nasal pharyngoesophagogastroduodenoscopy (T-EGD): technique. , 1994, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[3]  J. Hasford,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Unsedated Ultrathin Versus Standard Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Routine Outpatient Gastroenterology Practice: Does It Work Better through the Nose? , 2003, Endoscopy.

[4]  R. Holubkov,et al.  Transnasal endoscopy vs. fluoroscopy for the placement of nasoenteric feeding tubes in critically ill patients. , 2005, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[5]  T. Ponchon,et al.  Unsedated transnasal PEG placement. , 2004, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[6]  T. Ponchon,et al.  Prospective evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: feasibility and study on performance and tolerance. , 1999, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[7]  R. Nozaki,et al.  Evaluation of Small‐caliber Transnasal Panendoscopes for Upper G‐I Screening Examination , 1995 .

[8]  L. Brandt.  Patients’ Attitudes And Apprehensions About Endoscopy: How To Calm Troubled Waters , 2001, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[9]  G. Bell,et al.  Premedication, Preparation, and Surveillance , 2000, Endoscopy.

[10]  M. Rué,et al.  Identification of factors that influence tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. , 1999, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[11]  J. Dent,et al.  A comparison of transnasal and transoral endoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes in unsedated patients. , 1999, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[12]  D. Oakley,et al.  Psychological aspects of gastrointestinal endoscopy: a review. , 1996, Endoscopy.

[13]  W. Rees,et al.  The use of hypnosis in gastroscopy: a comparison with intravenous sedation , 1999, Postgraduate medical journal.

[14]  M. Farthing,et al.  A Prospective Controlled Trial of an Ultrathin Versus a Conventional Endoscope in Unsedated Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy , 2001, Endoscopy.

[15]  Meng Xu,et al.  A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Unsedated Esophagoscopy via Transnasal and Transoral Routes Using a 4-mm Video Endoscope with Conventional Endoscopy with Sedation , 2005, Endoscopy.

[16]  H. Neuhaus,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Unsedated Transnasal Small-Caliber Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus Peroral Small-Caliber EGD versus Conventional EGD , 2003, Endoscopy.

[17]  J. Sulkes,et al.  A patient education program is cost-effective for preventing failure of endoscopic procedures in a gastroenterology department , 2001, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[18]  R. Hawes,et al.  Struggling toward easier endoscopy. , 1998, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[19]  A. Montserrat,et al.  Transnasal Gastroscopy Compared to Conventional Gastroscopy: A Randomized Study of Feasibility, Safety, and Tolerance , 1998, Endoscopy.

[20]  S. Rogers,et al.  Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated EGD: a multicenter randomized trial. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[21]  L. Trevisani,et al.  Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: are preparatory interventions or conscious sedation effective? A randomized trial. , 2004, World journal of gastroenterology.

[22]  Y. Kinoshita,et al.  A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. , 2005, Endoscopy.

[23]  B. Krakamp,et al.  Prospektive Studie zum Vergleich von herkömmlicher und transnasaler Ösophago-Gastro-Duodenoskopie in der Routinediagnostik , 2004 .

[24]  H. Al-Atrakchi.  Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy without sedation: a prospective study of 2000 examination , 1989 .

[25]  D. Provenzale,et al.  Patient preferences and quality of life associated with colorectal cancer screening. , 1997, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[26]  R. Shaker,et al.  Another indication for transnasal, unsedated upper-GI endoscopy. , 2005, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[27]  M. de Cesare,et al.  Unsedated Transnasal Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement in Selected Patients , 2005, Endoscopy.

[28]  R. Shaker,et al.  Unsedated transnasal laryngo-esophagogastroduodenoscopy: an alternative to conventional endoscopy. , 2001, The American journal of medicine.

[29]  Thierry Ponchon,et al.  Unsedated transnasal EGD in daily practice: results with 1100 consecutive patients. , 2003, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[30]  M. Fennerty,et al.  A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope. , 1999, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.