Adapting Project Management Standards - Deriving Guidance from Reference Modelling

Project management standards provide an inventory of commonly accepted processes and tools which claim to be applicable in most cases. Project success largely depends on the suitability of the project management method and thus requires an adaptation of these standards for specific project types and contextual factors. This can be supported through the development of detailed, re-usable guidelines on how to “customize” standards. The goal of this paper is to analyse the potential offered by the field of reference modelling for this purpose. Here, design principles support the transfer and extension of knowledge from a reference model into an application model and can in principle all be transferred into project management. However, this paper shows that limitations occur due to the current design of project management standards. This topic is of utmost importance for IT projects, as they are differ from more conventional project types and thus call for larger alterations.

[1]  Brian Hobbs,et al.  Aligning Capability with Strategy: Categorizing Projects to do the Right Projects and to do Them Right , 2006 .

[2]  Erling S. Andersen.  Toward a Project Management Theory for Renewal Projects , 2006 .

[3]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  How Projects Differ, And What to Do About It , 2007 .

[4]  Franz Lehner,et al.  Modelle und Modellierung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik , 1995 .

[5]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights – A comparative analysis of NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter loss , 2009 .

[6]  Jürgen Huschens,et al.  IBM Insurance Application Architecture (IAA) - An overview of the Insurance Business Architecture , 2006, Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems.

[7]  Thomas Teufel,et al.  Sap R/3 Process Oriented Implementation , 1998 .

[8]  J. R. Turner,et al.  Goals-and-methods matrix: coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them , 1993 .

[9]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Configurative Process Modeling - Outlining an Approach to Increased Business Process Model Usability , 2004 .

[10]  Ekkart Kindler,et al.  First International Workshop on Business Process Reference Models (BPRM’05) , 2005 .

[11]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  From a single discipline product to a multidisciplinary system: Adapting the right style to the right project , 2003 .

[12]  Julien Pollack,et al.  Hard and soft projects: a framework for analysis , 2004 .

[13]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Configurable Process Models as a Basis for Reference Modeling , 2005, Business Process Management Workshops.

[14]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Contingent management in temporary, dynamic organizations: The comparative analysis of projects , 2001 .

[15]  Dov Dvir,et al.  In search of project classification: a non-universal approach to project success factors , 1998 .

[16]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Referenzmodellierung: Gestaltung und Verteilung von Konstruktionsprozessen , 2003 .

[17]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  Company-wide project management: the planning and control of programmes of projects of different type , 1999 .

[18]  Oliver Thomas,et al.  Understanding the Term Reference Model in Information Systems Research: History, Literature Analysis and Explanation , 2005, Business Process Management Workshops.

[19]  Brian Hobbs,et al.  Project Management Practice, Generic or Contextual: A Reality Check , 2008 .

[20]  Hans-Bernd Kittlaus,et al.  The SIZ Banking Data Model , 1998 .