Chaos–order transition in foraging behavior of ants

Significance We have studied the foraging behavior of group animals that live in fixed colonies (especially ants) as an important problem in ecology. Building on former findings on deterministic chaotic activities of single ants, we uncovered that the transition from chaotic to periodic regimes results from an optimization scheme of the self-organization of such an animal colony. We found that an effective foraging of ants mainly depends on their nest as well as their physical abilities and knowledge due to experience. As an important outcome, the foraging behavior of ants is not represented by random, but rather by deterministic walks, in a random environment: Ants use their intelligence and experience to navigate. The study of the foraging behavior of group animals (especially ants) is of practical ecological importance, but it also contributes to the development of widely applicable optimization problem-solving techniques. Biologists have discovered that single ants exhibit low-dimensional deterministic-chaotic activities. However, the influences of the nest, ants’ physical abilities, and ants’ knowledge (or experience) on foraging behavior have received relatively little attention in studies of the collective behavior of ants. This paper provides new insights into basic mechanisms of effective foraging for social insects or group animals that have a home. We propose that the whole foraging process of ants is controlled by three successive strategies: hunting, homing, and path building. A mathematical model is developed to study this complex scheme. We show that the transition from chaotic to periodic regimes observed in our model results from an optimization scheme for group animals with a home. According to our investigation, the behavior of such insects is not represented by random but rather deterministic walks (as generated by deterministic dynamical systems, e.g., by maps) in a random environment: the animals use their intelligence and experience to guide them. The more knowledge an ant has, the higher its foraging efficiency is. When young insects join the collective to forage with old and middle-aged ants, it benefits the whole colony in the long run. The resulting strategy can even be optimal.

[1]  D'arcy W. Thompson,et al.  On Growth and Form , 1917, Nature.

[2]  J. H. Sudd,et al.  An Introduction to the Behaviour of Ants , 1967 .

[3]  J. Herbers,et al.  Social organization in Leptothorax ants: within- and between-species patterns , 1983 .

[4]  B. Cole Is animal behaviour chaotic? Evidence from the activity of ants , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Oscillations and Chaos in Ant Societies , 1993 .

[6]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Chaotic simulated annealing by a neural network model with transient chaos , 1995, Neural Networks.

[7]  T. Roska,et al.  A CNN model of oscillation and chaos in ant colonies: a case study , 1995 .

[8]  P. A. Prince,et al.  Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses , 1996, Nature.

[9]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems , 1999 .

[10]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  From Natural to Artificial Swarm Intelligence , 1999 .

[11]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  Inspiration for optimization from social insect behaviour , 2000, Nature.

[12]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized asymmetries in ant foraging: A functional response to food type and colony needs , 2002 .

[13]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Chaos engineering and its application to parallel distributed processing with chaotic neural networks , 2002, Proc. IEEE.

[14]  Leonid A. Bunimovich,et al.  Deterministic walks in random environments , 2004 .

[15]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Optimal traffic organization in ants under crowded conditions , 2004, Nature.

[16]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the argentine ant , 1990, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[17]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[18]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Triggering and persistence of trail-laying in foragers of the ant Lasius niger. , 2005, Journal of insect physiology.

[19]  Lixiang Li,et al.  An Optimization Method Inspired by "chaotic" Ant Behavior , 2006, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[20]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Revisiting Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer , 2007, Nature.

[21]  John Travis,et al.  Do Wandering Albatrosses Care About Math? , 2007, Science.

[22]  J. Travis Ecology. Do wandering albatrosses care about math? , 2007, Science.

[23]  R. Wehner,et al.  Multiroute memories in desert ants , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  G. Viswanathan,et al.  Lévy flights and superdiffusion in the context of biological encounters and random searches , 2008 .

[25]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Evidence for a bimodal distribution in human communication , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Haipeng Peng,et al.  Parameter estimation of dynamical systems via a chaotic ant swarm. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Andy M. Reynolds,et al.  On the origin of bursts and heavy tails in animal dynamics , 2011 .

[28]  Zhengzheng S Liang,et al.  Molecular Determinants of Scouting Behavior in Honey Bees , 2012, Science.

[29]  Wolfgang Ziegler,et al.  Swarm Intelligence From Natural To Artificial Systems , 2016 .