Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events: results from the CHARISMA trial.

OBJECTIVE To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel plus aspirin (C + A) compared with aspirin (A) alone during the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management and Avoidance (CHARISMA) trial from a US payer perspective. BACKGROUND Although the CHARISMA trial did not find a benefit of adding clopidogrel to aspirin in its overall study cohort, a benefit was suggested in a prespecified subgroup of patients with established cardiovascular (CV) disease. The cost-effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy in this population is unknown. METHODS Medical resource utilization was assessed prospectively, and costs for hospitalizations, physician services, outpatient care, and medications were assigned using 2007 US dollars. Life expectancy was estimated contingent on fatal and nonfatal CV events using statistical models of long-term survival from the Saskatchewan Health database. RESULTS C + A was associated with a 12.5% relative reduction in CV death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with A alone (6.9% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.048) over a median 28 months of follow-up. Severe or moderate bleeding events were higher in patients receiving C + A versus A alone (3.6% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.001). Mean cost/patient was $2607 higher for C + A, while projected life expectancy increased by an average of 0.072 years due to fewer in-trial events. The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for C + A was $36,343/year of life gained. Findings were insensitive to discount rate, life expectancy projections, post-event costs, and indirect costs from lost productivity; the ICER was most sensitive to the cost of clopidogrel. Bootstrap analysis demonstrated that the ICER for C + A remained <$50,000/life-year gained in 70.6% of bootstrap replicates and <$100,000/life-year gained in 87.4%. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with established CV disease, adding clopidogrel to aspirin appears to increase life expectancy modestly at a cost generally considered acceptable within the US health-care system.

[1]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Patients with prior myocardial infarction, stroke, or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the CHARISMA trial. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  David B Matchar,et al.  Clopidogrel use and long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation. , 2007, JAMA.

[3]  Patrice Cacoub,et al.  Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Gore,et al.  Trends in community mortality due to coronary heart disease. , 2006, American heart journal.

[5]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  International prevalence, recognition, and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in outpatients with atherothrombosis. , 2006, JAMA.

[6]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Long-term cost-effectiveness of early and sustained clopidogrel therapy for up to 1 year in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after presenting with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. , 2006, American heart journal.

[7]  Roland Chen,et al.  Long-term cost effectiveness of early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel given for up to one year after percutaneous coronary intervention results: from the Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) trial. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Long-term cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel given for up to one year in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  J. Caro,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Eplerenone Compared With Placebo in Patients With Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Heart Failure , 2005, Circulation.

[10]  P. Heidenreich,et al.  A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Combination Antiplatelet Therapy for High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndromes: Clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin Alone , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  E. Peterson,et al.  Economic effects of prolonged clopidogrel therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  J. Caro,et al.  Estimating survival for cost-effectiveness analyses: a case study in atherothrombosis. , 2004, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[13]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Clopidogrel added to aspirin versus aspirin alone in secondary prevention and high-risk primary prevention: rationale and design of the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance (CHARISMA) trial. , 2004, American heart journal.

[14]  D. Owens,et al.  Clopidogrel versus aspirin for secondary prophylaxis of vascular events: a cost-effectiveness analysis ☆ , 2004 .

[15]  J. D. de Lemos,et al.  Aspirin, clopidogrel, or both for secondary prevention of coronary disease. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  S. Ramsey Aspirin, clopidogrel, or both for secondary prevention of coronary disease. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  B J O'Brien,et al.  Analysis of uncertainty in health care cost-effectiveness studies: an introduction to statistical issues and methods , 2002, Statistical methods in medical research.

[18]  Eric J Topol,et al.  Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[19]  C. Cannon,et al.  Cost and cost-effectiveness of an early invasive vs conservative strategy for the treatment of unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2002, JAMA.

[20]  Karen M Kuntz,et al.  Cost effectiveness of aspirin, clopidogrel, or both for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  P. Beck,et al.  Health Databases in Saskatchewan , 2002 .

[22]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study , 2001, The Lancet.

[23]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  A A Tsiatis,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with eptifibatide in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2000, Circulation.

[25]  M. Johannesson,et al.  Cost effectiveness of simvastatin treatment to lower cholesterol levels in patients with coronary heart disease. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  M. Dennis A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee , 1996 .

[27]  L. Goldman,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of routine coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction. , 1996, Circulation.

[28]  D. Clement A randomised, blinded, trial of Clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE) , 1996 .

[29]  M A Koopmanschap,et al.  The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. , 1995, Journal of health economics.