Ipilimumab in a real‐world population: A prospective Phase IV trial with long‐term follow‐up

Ipilimumab was the first treatment that improved survival in advanced melanoma. Efficacy and toxicity in a real‐world setting may differ from clinical trials, due to more liberal eligibility criteria and less intensive monitoring. Moreover, high costs and lack of biomarkers have raised cost‐benefit concerns about ipilimumab in national healthcare systems and limited its use. Here, we report the prospective, interventional study, Ipi4 (NCT02068196), which aimed to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of ipilimumab in a real‐world population with advanced melanoma. This national, multicentre, phase IV trial included 151 patients. Patients received ipilimumab 3 mg/kg intravenously and were followed for at least 5 years or until death. Treatment interruption or cessation occurred in 38%, most frequently due to disease progression (19%). Treatment‐associated grade 3 to 4 toxicity was observed in 28% of patients, and immune‐related toxicity in 56%. The overall response rate was 9%. Median overall survival was 12.1 months (95% CI: 8.3‐15.9); and progression‐free survival 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.6‐2.8). After 5 years, 20% of patients were alive. In a landmark analysis from 6 months, improved survival was associated with objective response (HR 0.16, P = .001) and stable disease (HR 0.49, P = .005) compared to progressive disease. Poor performance status, elevated lactate dehydrogenase and C‐reactive protein were identified as biomarkers. This prospective trial represents the longest reported follow‐up of a real‐world melanoma population treated with ipilimumab. Results indicate safety and efficacy comparable to phase III trials and suggest that the use of ipilimumab can be based on current cost‐benefit estimates.

[1]  J. Larkin,et al.  Predictive biomarkers for response to immune checkpoint inhibition. , 2021, Seminars in cancer biology.

[2]  R. Dummer,et al.  Long-term safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy and relationship with clinical outcome: A landmark analysis in patients with advanced melanoma , 2020, European journal of cancer.

[3]  F. Massari,et al.  Immortal time bias in the association between toxicity and response for immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis. , 2020, Immunotherapy.

[4]  M. Filetti,et al.  Effect of concomitant medications with immune-modulatory properties on the outcomes of patients with advanced cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: development and validation of a novel prognostic index. , 2020, European journal of cancer.

[5]  Kelvin K. W. Chan,et al.  Real‐world, population‐based cohort study of toxicity and resource utilization of second‐line ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma in Ontario, Canada , 2020, International journal of cancer.

[6]  J. Larkin,et al.  Five-year review of corticosteroid duration and complications in the management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related diarrhoea and colitis in advanced melanoma , 2020, ESMO Open.

[7]  E. Itakura,et al.  Real‐world safety and efficacy data of ipilimumab in Japanese radically unresectable malignant melanoma patients: A postmarketing surveillance , 2020, The Journal of dermatology.

[8]  David M. Woods,et al.  Serum interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein are associated with survival in melanoma patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibition , 2020, Journal for immunotherapy of cancer.

[9]  David M. Woods,et al.  C reactive protein impairs adaptive immunity in immune cells of patients with melanoma , 2020, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.

[10]  J. Larkin,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-006): post-hoc 5-year results from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[11]  S. Aamdal,et al.  Prognostic biomarkers for immunotherapy with ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma , 2019, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[12]  J. Limpens,et al.  Biomarkers, measured during therapy, for response of melanoma patients to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review , 2019, Melanoma research.

[13]  J. Allison,et al.  Fundamental Mechanisms of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy. , 2018, Cancer discovery.

[14]  G. Hospers,et al.  Real-world use, safety, and survival of ipilimumab in metastatic cutaneous melanoma in The Netherlands , 2018, Anti-cancer drugs.

[15]  P. Ascierto,et al.  Real‐world treatment patterns and outcomes among metastatic cutaneous melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab , 2018, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[16]  A. Ribas,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006) , 2017, The Lancet.

[17]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Overall Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  M. Wiese,et al.  Predicting response and toxicity to immune checkpoint inhibitors using routinely available blood and clinical markers , 2017, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  V. Chiarion-Sileni,et al.  Ipilimumab in real-world clinical practice: efficacy and safety data from a multicenter observational study , 2017, Journal of chemotherapy.

[20]  G. Redelman-Sidi,et al.  The Spectrum of Serious Infections Among Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Blockade for the Treatment of Melanoma. , 2016, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[21]  Matthew Wongchenko,et al.  Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib in advanced BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma (coBRIM): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[22]  A. Pérez‐Pitarch,et al.  Effectiveness, toxicity, and economic evaluation of ipilimumab for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma in the Spanish outpatient setting , 2016, Anti-cancer drugs.

[23]  C. Horak,et al.  Sequential administration of nivolumab and ipilimumab with a planned switch in patients with advanced melanoma (CheckMate 064): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[24]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Baseline Peripheral Blood Biomarkers Associated with Clinical Outcome of Advanced Melanoma Patients Treated with Ipilimumab , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  J. Larkin,et al.  Prognostic score for patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab. , 2015, European journal of cancer.

[26]  A. Poprach,et al.  Long-term Survival with Ipilimumab: Experience from a National Expanded Access Program for Patients with Melanoma. , 2015, Anticancer research.

[27]  M. Valsecchi Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  J. Larkin,et al.  Ipilimumab in the real world: the UK expanded access programme experience in previously treated advanced melanoma patients , 2015, Melanoma research.

[29]  J. Utikal,et al.  Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[30]  J. Larkin,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  C. Lebbé,et al.  Single-center study under a French Temporary Authorization for Use (TAU) protocol for ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma: negative impact of baseline corticosteroids , 2015, European Journal of Dermatology.

[32]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Pooled Analysis of Long-Term Survival Data From Phase II and Phase III Trials of Ipilimumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  A. Arance,et al.  Ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: experience from the Spanish Expanded Access Program , 2014, Melanoma research.

[35]  A. Hauschild,et al.  Effectiveness and Tolerability of Ipilimumab: Experiences From 198 Patients Included in a Named-Patient Program in Various Daily-Practice Settings and Multiple Institutions , 2014, Journal of immunotherapy.

[36]  P. Ascierto,et al.  Clinical experience with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg: real-world efficacy and safety data from an expanded access programme cohort , 2014, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[37]  F. Fulciniti,et al.  Immunological and biological changes during ipilimumab treatment and their potential correlation with clinical response and survival in patients with advanced melanoma , 2014, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[38]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Lactate dehydrogenase as a selection criterion for ipilimumab treatment in metastatic melanoma , 2014, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[39]  J. Haanen,et al.  Efficacy and safety of ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma patients surviving more than 2 years following treatment in a phase III trial (MDX010-20). , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[40]  A. Hauschild,et al.  Management of immune-related adverse events and kinetics of response with ipilimumab. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[42]  Axel Hoos,et al.  Guidelines for the Evaluation of Immune Therapy Activity in Solid Tumors: Immune-Related Response Criteria , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[43]  A. Maraveyas,et al.  A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study Comparing the Tolerability and Efficacy of Ipilimumab Administered with or without Prophylactic Budesonide in Patients with Unresectable Stage III or IV Melanoma , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[44]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Prognostic Factors Related to Clinical Response in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated by CTL-Associated Antigen-4 Blockade , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[45]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Autoimmunity correlates with tumor regression in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  Young Hak Kim,et al.  Emerging concerns of infectious diseases in lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. , 2019, Respiratory medicine.

[47]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Five-Year Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[48]  A. Hauschild,et al.  Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[49]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.