Coordination of Supply Chain under Blockchain System-Based Product Lifecycle Information Sharing Effort

The study proposes a supply chain contractual coordination model based on the product lifecycle information sharing effort and consumers' price sensitivity to a product with the Blockchain system. This paper examined the following five scenarios: (1) centralized supply chain with Blockchain system-based product lifecycle information sharing investment; (2) Stackelberg leader retailer processed and invested Blockchain system scenario; (3) retailer processed the Blockchain system cost-sharing scenario; (4) retailer processed Blockchain system investment through bargaining the revenue-sharing model; (5) Blockchain system investment under the cost and revenue-sharing contract. The study used the game theory reverse induction method to compare the Nash equilibrium solutions under different decision-making scenarios and discussed the chain member’s constraint condition of Blockchain system investment. We simulated and analysed the products’ lifecycle information sharing effort cost factor, the influence of price sensitivity coefficient, and expected profits of the supplier and retailer. The study results show that the product lifecycle information sharing effort under the Blockchain system increases the profit of the whole chain and decreases with the increase of customer’s price sensitivity coefficient.

[1]  Huihui Song,et al.  Green supply chain game model and analysis under revenue-sharing contract , 2018 .

[2]  Qingju Wang,et al.  When Intrusion Detection Meets Blockchain Technology: A Review , 2018, IEEE Access.

[3]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Capacity Choice and Allocation: Strategic Behavior and Supply Chain Performance , 1999 .

[4]  Burkhard Stiller,et al.  Blockchains everywhere - a use-case of blockchains in the pharma supply-chain , 2017, 2017 IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM).

[5]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  A Review on Supply Chain Coordination: Coordination Mechanisms, Managing Uncertainty and Research Directions , 2011 .

[6]  M. Jian,et al.  Decision-making strategies in supply chain management with a waste-averse and stockout-averse manufacturer , 2018 .

[7]  Janat Shah,et al.  Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract , 2015 .

[8]  Sokwoo Rhee Catalyzing the Internet of Things and smart cities: Global City Teams Challenge , 2016, 2016 1st International Workshop on Science of Smart City Operations and Platforms Engineering (SCOPE) in partnership with Global City Teams Challenge (GCTC) (SCOPE - GCTC).

[9]  Chia-Hui Wang,et al.  Blockchain-based payment collection supervision system using pervasive Bitcoin digital wallet , 2017, 2017 IEEE 13th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[10]  Christian A. Ullrich Introduction to Supply Chain Management , 2014 .

[11]  Andreas Unterweger,et al.  Privacy-preserving blockchain-based electric vehicle charging with dynamic tariff decisions , 2018, Computer Science - Research and Development.

[12]  Petros Ieromonachou,et al.  Supply chain contracting coordination for fresh products with fresh-keeping effort , 2017, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[13]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information sharing in a supply chain , 2000, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[14]  Zina Ben Miled,et al.  A Distributed Ledger for Supply Chain Physical Distribution Visibility , 2017, Inf..

[15]  Ravi Anupindi,et al.  Supply Contracts with Quantity Commitments and Stochastic Demand , 1999 .

[16]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[17]  Dilip Chhajed,et al.  Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual - Channel Supply - Chain Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Feng Tian,et al.  An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology , 2016, 2016 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM).