Is mammographic spiculation an independent, good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer?

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to review the prognostic significance of pathologic and radiologic factors for screening-detected invasive breast cancers of any size. MATERIALS AND METHODS The patient group was a consecutive series of 470 screening-detected invasive breast cancers that were diagnosed between 1988 and 1998. Data regarding tumor type, grade, maximum invasive diameter, lymph node status, and the presence or absence of vascular invasion were recorded, as were the mammographic features of the lesion. Survival was ascertained from hospital records and a cancer registry. Differences in survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves with a log-rank test for difference. The significance of any correlations was assessed using the chi-square test and the chi-square test for trend. Multivariate analysis used a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS At univariate analysis, large invasive size, the presence of definite vascular invasion, high histologic grade, and nodal involvement were associated with poorer breast-cancer-specific survival. Mammographic spiculation (the presence of either a spiculated mass or distortion) was associated with more prolonged breast-cancer-specific survival. The presence or absence of mammographic comedo calcification did not influence breast-cancer-specific survival. In a Cox multivariate analysis that included those factors significant in univariate analysis, size, grade, nodal stage, and mammographic spiculation maintained their prognostic significance. CONCLUSION Mammographic spiculation is an independent, good prognostic factor for screening-detected invasive breast cancer. The mechanism of how mammographic spiculation confers a beneficial prognostic effect is not clear.

[1]  Yueh-Hsia Chiu,et al.  Mammographic tumor features can predict long‐term outcomes reliably in women with 1–14‐mm invasive breast carcinoma , 2004, Cancer.

[2]  Jane Warwick,et al.  Time‐dependent effects on survival in breast carcinoma , 2004, Cancer.

[3]  R. Given-Wilson,et al.  Mammographic casting-type calcification associated with small screen-detected invasive breast cancers: is this a reliable prognostic indicator? , 2004, Clinical radiology.

[4]  T. Nishikawa,et al.  Blood Vessel Invasion as a Predictor of Long-Term Survival for Japanese Patients with Breast Cancer , 2002, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[5]  E. Thurfjell,et al.  Mammographic finding as predictor of survival in 1–9mm invasive breast cancers. Worse prognosis for cases presenting as calcifications alone , 2001, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[6]  I. Ellis,et al.  Is the presence of mammographic comedo calcification really a prognostic factor for small screen-detected invasive breast cancers? , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[7]  George Hermann,et al.  Mammographic Appearance of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer Reflects Pathologic Characteristics , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[8]  E. van Marck,et al.  Intratumoral hypoxia resulting in the presence of a fibrotic focus is an independent predictor of early distant relapse in lymph node‐negative breast cancer patients , 2001, Histopathology.

[9]  M. Kurosumi,et al.  Relationship between existence of lymphatic invasion in peritumoral breast tissue and presence of axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. , 2001, Oncology reports.

[10]  C. Giardina,et al.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer: the predictive value of the Nottingham Prognostic Index in patients with a long-term follow-up that were treated in a single institution. , 2001, European journal of cancer.

[11]  R. Walker,et al.  The complexities of breast cancer desmoplasia , 2001, Breast Cancer Research.

[12]  Stephen W Duffy,et al.  A novel method for prediction of long-term outcome of women with T1a, T1b, and 10–14 mm invasive breast cancers: a prospective study , 2000, The Lancet.

[13]  L. Tabár,et al.  The natural history of breast carcinoma , 1999, Cancer.

[14]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. , 1999, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[15]  I. Ellis,et al.  Correlations between the mammographic features of screen detected invasive breast cancer and pathological prognostic factors , 1997 .

[16]  S. Pinder,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. IV: Should you be a typer or a grader? A comparative study of two histological prognostic features in operable breast carcinoma , 1995, Histopathology.

[17]  S. Pinder,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. III. Vascular invasion: relationship with recurrence and survival in a large study with long‐term follow‐up , 1994, Histopathology.

[18]  J. Torhorst,et al.  Factors predicting treatment responsiveness and prognosis in node-negative breast cancer. The International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Breast cancer: reliability of mammographic appearance as a predictor of hormone receptor status. , 1992, Radiology.

[20]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[21]  Donald E. Henson,et al.  Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases , 1989 .

[22]  I. O. Ellis,et al.  Confirmation of a prognostic index in primary breast cancer. , 1987, British Journal of Cancer.