Research methods: managing primary study quality in meta-analyses.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S Greenland,et al. Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.
[2] I. Chalmers,et al. The Landscape and Lexicon of Blinding in Randomized Trials , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[3] I Olkin,et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. A concern for standards;. , 1995, JAMA.
[4] Douglas G Altman,et al. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ research , 2002, Statistics in medicine.
[5] K. Khan,et al. When small degrees of bias in randomized trials can mislead clinical decisions: An example of individualizing preventive treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding , 2002, Critical care medicine.
[6] R. J. Hayes,et al. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.
[7] Paul Knipschild,et al. Systematic Reviews on the Basis of Methodological Criteria , 1997 .
[8] A D Oxman,et al. Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles , 1994 .
[9] A R Jadad,et al. Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: Current Issues and Future Directions , 1996, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[10] R. Hyman. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (Book) , 1982 .
[11] A. Laupacis,et al. WHAT SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN META-ANALYSES? , 2000, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[12] D Tritchler. Modelling study quality in meta-analysis. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.
[13] Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.
[14] D. Cook,et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. , 1999, Health technology assessment.
[15] D Moher,et al. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. , 2001, Annals of internal medicine.
[16] S. Brown. Meta-analysis of diabetes patient education research: variations in intervention effects across studies. , 1992, Research in nursing & health.
[17] C. Eccleston,et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache , 1999, Pain.
[18] J Gabbay,et al. 'Early warning systems' for identifying new healthcare technologies. , 1999, Health technology assessment.
[19] M. Egger,et al. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. , 1999, JAMA.
[20] L. Bouter,et al. Steroid injections for shoulder disorders: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. , 1996, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
[21] D. Sharpe,et al. Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. , 1997, Clinical psychology review.
[22] Paul M. Wortman,et al. Judging research quality. , 1994 .
[23] T. Cook,et al. Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .
[24] Ethan M Balk,et al. Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. , 2002, JAMA.
[25] M. Suarez‐Almazor,et al. The efficacy of folic acid and folinic acid in reducing methotrexate gastrointestinal toxicity in rheumatoid arthritis. A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. , 1998, The Journal of rheumatology.
[26] D. Cook,et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? , 1998, The Lancet.
[27] A. Jadad,et al. The importance of quality of primary studies in producing unbiased systematic reviews. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.
[28] C D Naylor,et al. Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[29] Jeffrey C. Valentine,et al. The Department of Education’s What Works Clearinghouse Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device: Version 1.0 , 2003 .
[30] A. Vickers,et al. INCORPORATING DATA FROM DISSERTATIONS IN SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS , 2000, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[31] Christian Gluud,et al. Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[32] Douglas G Altman,et al. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. , 2001, BMJ.
[33] A R Jadad,et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.
[34] A R Jadad,et al. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. , 1995, Controlled clinical trials.
[35] K. Lohr,et al. Assessing "best evidence": issues in grading the quality of studies for systematic reviews. , 1999, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.
[36] N. Black,et al. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.
[37] P. Raina,et al. Assessing the Methodological Quality of Nonrandomized Intervention Studies , 2003, Western journal of nursing research.
[38] Cheryl Tatano Beck. Facilitating the work of a meta-analyst. , 1999, Research in nursing & health.
[39] N McKoy,et al. Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. , 2002, Evidence report/technology assessment.
[40] J D Emerson,et al. An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials. , 1990, Controlled clinical trials.
[41] On the Social Psychology of Using Research: The Case of Desegregation and Black Achievement. , 1984 .
[42] A D Oxman,et al. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials , 1998, BMJ.
[43] W B Jonas,et al. Impact of study quality on outcome in placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[44] A Liberati,et al. A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer. , 1986, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[45] R. Fletcher,et al. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. , 1990, JAMA.
[46] K. Seers,et al. Development of a tool to rate the quality assessment of randomized controlled trials using a Delphi technique. , 1997, Journal of advanced nursing.
[47] F. Mosteller,et al. How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. I: Medical. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.
[48] L. Bouter,et al. The relationship between methodological quality and conclusions in reviews of spinal manipulation. , 1995, JAMA.
[49] T C Chalmers,et al. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. , 1981, Controlled clinical trials.
[50] Jeffrey C. Valentine,et al. Interventions to increase physical activity among aging adults: A meta-analysis , 2002, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.
[51] V. Conn,et al. Meta-analysis and public policy: opportunity for nursing impact. , 1996, Nursing outlook.