Uncertainty analysis in mechanism reduction via active subspace and transition state analyses

Abstract A systematic approach is formulated for the uncertainty analysis of kinetic parameters on combustion characteristics during skeletal reduction. The active subspace method together with sensitivity analysis is first employed to identify extreme low-dimensional active subspace of input parameter space and to facilitate the construction of response surfaces with small size of samples. An intermediate transition state during reduction is then defined such that the uncertainty change arising from uncertainty parameter truncation and reaction coupling during reduction can be decoupled and quantified. The approach is demonstrated in the reduction of a 55-species, 290-reaction dimethyl ether (DME) mechanism, with the rate constants characterized by independent lognormal distribution. Three representative skeletal mechanisms are identified for the uncertainty analysis, with each of the subsequent reduction yielding significant errors in the single-stage and/or two-stage DME-air auto-ignition process. Results show that sensitivity analysis can reduce the number of kinetic parameters from 290 down to 32, and the active subspace method can further identify a dominant active direction within this 32-dimensional subspace, which greatly facilitates the polynomial fitting for constructing the response surface of the ignition delay times. The uncertainty analysis with the polynomial chaos expansion method shows that the reduction from DME42 with 42 species to DME40 with 40 species has influential effect on the high-temperature reaction pathway; while the reduction from DME55 to DME42 and from DME40 to DME30 mainly affects the low-temperature pathway. In addition, the uncertainty change associated with parameter truncation is shown to be proportional to the change in the most active direction, which could further accelerate uncertainty analysis.

[1]  Cosmin Safta,et al.  Chemical model reduction under uncertainty , 2017 .

[2]  C. Law,et al.  Toward accommodating realistic fuel chemistry in large-scale computations , 2009 .

[3]  Johan Larsson,et al.  Exploiting active subspaces to quantify uncertainty in the numerical simulation of the HyShot II scramjet , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[4]  Zhuyin Ren,et al.  Quantifying kinetic uncertainty in turbulent combustion simulations using active subspaces , 2019 .

[5]  Jakub Dlabka,et al.  Evaluation of Combustion Mechanisms Using Global Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses: A Case Study for Low‐Temperature Dimethyl Ether Oxidation , 2014 .

[6]  Chung King Law,et al.  The role of global and detailed kinetics in the first-stage ignition delay in NTC-affected phenomena , 2013 .

[7]  Kyle E. Niemeyer,et al.  On the importance of graph search algorithms for DRGEP-based mechanism reduction methods , 2011, ArXiv.

[8]  Hai Wang,et al.  Combustion kinetic model uncertainty quantification, propagation and minimization , 2015 .

[9]  D. Kyritsis,et al.  Comparative investigation of homogeneous autoignition of DME/air and EtOH/air mixtures at low initial temperatures , 2017 .

[10]  Qiqi Wang,et al.  Erratum: Active Subspace Methods in Theory and Practice: Applications to Kriging Surfaces , 2013, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[11]  Tamás Turányi,et al.  Applications of sensitivity analysis to combustion chemistry , 1997 .

[12]  Chung King Law,et al.  Skeletal Reaction Model Generation, Uncertainty Quantification and Minimization: Combustion of Butane , 2014 .

[13]  Kyle E. Niemeyer,et al.  Skeletal mechanism generation for surrogate fuels using directed relation graph with error propagation and sensitivity analysis , 2009, 1607.05079.

[14]  C. Law,et al.  A directed relation graph method for mechanism reduction , 2005 .

[15]  Zhuyin Ren,et al.  Shared low-dimensional subspaces for propagating kinetic uncertainty to multiple outputs , 2018 .

[16]  Tamás Turányi,et al.  Uncertainty of Arrhenius parameters , 2011 .

[17]  Frederick L. Dryer,et al.  The reaction kinetics of dimethyl ether. II: Low‐temperature oxidation in flow reactors , 2000 .

[18]  Peter P. Valko,et al.  Principal component analysis of kinetic models , 1985 .

[19]  D. Kyritsis,et al.  Autoignition dynamics of DME/air and EtOH/air homogeneous mixtures , 2015 .

[20]  Hai Wang,et al.  Joint probability distribution of Arrhenius parameters in reaction model optimization and uncertainty minimization , 2019, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute.

[21]  David A. Sheen,et al.  The method of uncertainty quantification and minimization using polynomial chaos expansions , 2011 .

[22]  Terese Løvås,et al.  Spectral uncertainty quantification, propagation and optimization of a detailed kinetic model for ethylene combustion , 2009 .

[23]  H. Rabitz,et al.  Efficient input-output model representations , 1999 .

[24]  F. Dryer,et al.  Thermal decomposition reaction and a comprehensive kinetic model of dimethyl ether , 2008 .

[25]  Chung King Law,et al.  On the controlling mechanism of the upper turnover states in the NTC regime , 2016 .

[26]  C. Law,et al.  Evolution of sensitivity directions during autoignition , 2019, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute.

[27]  C. Law,et al.  NTC-affected ignition and low-temperature flames in nonpremixed DME/air counterflow , 2014 .

[28]  Y. Marzouk,et al.  Uncertainty quantification in chemical systems , 2009 .

[29]  Frederick L. Dryer,et al.  The reaction kinetics of dimethyl ether. I: High‐temperature pyrolysis and oxidation in flow reactors , 2000 .

[30]  S. H. Lam,et al.  Understanding complex chemical kinetics with computational singular perturbation , 1989 .