CORRELATION OF STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME MEASURES IN A PHASE ONE TRIAL OF CILIARY NEUROTROPHIC FACTOR IN TYPE 2 IDIOPATHIC MACULAR TELANGIECTASIA

Purpose: Macular telangiectasia Type 2 is a bilateral, progressive, potentially blinding retinal disease characterized by both vascular and neurodegenerative signs. Both the area of the break in the ellipsoid zone seen in “en face” optical coherence tomographic (OCT) images and microperimetric focal retinal sensitivity loss have been proposed as potential measures of progression in macular telangiectasia. The authors aimed to assess the characteristics and interrelationship of these structural and functional disease markers from the data collected in a phase one clinical trial of ciliary neurotrophic factor in macular telangiectasia. Methods: Orthogonal topographic (en face) maps of the ellipsoid zone were generated from Heidelberg Spectralis OCT volume scans (15 × 10° area, 30-&mgr;m B-scan intervals) or Zeiss Cirrus HD-OCT 4000 512 × 128 cube scans. Mesopic microperimetry was performed on CenterVue MAIA perimeters, using a Goldmann III stimulus in a custom test grid. Structural and functional data were analyzed by two methods: by calculating aggregate loss and by simple thresholding. The alignment quality of structural and functional data was also evaluated. Results: Overall, the break area showed a good correlation with aggregate sensitivity loss (&rgr; = 0.834, P < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval 0.716–0.906) but also with the number of test points below a threshold value (e.g., <20 dB: &rgr; = 0.843, P < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval 0.755–0.902). Significant misalignment of the MAIA test grid was apparent in 13/48 visits of 7/14 eyes. Conclusion: The authors found a good correlation between ellipsoid zone break area and function loss. En face OCT mapping of the ellipsoid zone appears to demonstrate structural change before mesopic microperimetry can detect a focal loss of retinal sensitivity. Thresholding offers a quick alternative to calculating aggregate sensitivity loss.

[1]  Richard F Spaide,et al.  OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IN UNILATERAL RESOLVED CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY , 2005, Retina.

[2]  Donald C Hood,et al.  A comparison of visual field sensitivity to photoreceptor thickness in retinitis pigmentosa. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  Catherine Egan,et al.  "En face" OCT imaging of the IS/OS junction line in type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Mark S Humayun,et al.  Patient selection for macular translocation surgery using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[5]  E. Chew,et al.  Ciliary neurotrophic factor for macular telangiectasia type 2: results from a phase 1 safety trial. , 2015, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  Richard B Rosen,et al.  INNER SEGMENT–OUTER SEGMENT JUNCTIONAL LAYER INTEGRITY AND CORRESPONDING RETINAL SENSITIVITY IN DRY AND WET FORMS OF AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION , 2010, Retina.

[7]  P. Charbel Issa,et al.  Treatment for Macular Telangiectasia Type 2. , 2016, Developments in ophthalmology.

[8]  K Bailey Freund,et al.  Photoreceptor outer segment abnormalities as a cause of blind spot enlargement in acute zonal occult outer retinopathy-complex diseases. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Emily Y. Chew,et al.  Macular telangiectasia type 2 , 2013, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[10]  M. Crossland,et al.  FIXATION STABILITY MEASUREMENT USING THE MP1 MICROPERIMETER , 2009, Retina.

[11]  G. Rubin,et al.  Test-retest variability of microperimetry using the Nidek MP1 in patients with macular disease. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  Catherine Egan,et al.  The IS/OS junction layer in the natural history of type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  W. Freeman,et al.  The association between percent disruption of the photoreceptor inner segment-outer segment junction and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  Marko Nardini,et al.  Feasibility of Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) Microperimetry in Children: Sensitivity, Reliability, and Fixation Stability in Healthy Observers. , 2016, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.