Forming Successful Business-to-Business Services in Goods-Dominant Firms

Extant literature is almost unanimous in suggesting that managers in goods-dominant firms should integrate services into their core market offers. Furthermore, in actual practice, numerous firms are striving with mixed results to become “solutions providers” by adding services to their portfolio of tangible goods. The literature does not, however, describe what factors to consider when adding services and how the factors should be designed to enhance organizational performance. The purpose of this study was to isolate and characterize factors that enable the formation of successful business-to-business (B2B) services in goods-dominant firms. Using a multicase research design, this study highlights four substantive cases of Fortune 500 firms in which B2B service development was a process of aligning strategy with a highly complex market. The study then illustrates how firms that demonstrate a record of successful B2B service development adapt several factors of organization to align with the newly formed strategy.

[1]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[2]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[3]  R. Duncan.  Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[4]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[5]  J. Pennings.  The Relevance of the Structural-Contingency Model for Organizational Effectiveness. , 1975 .

[6]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[7]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The structuring of organizations : a synthesis of the research , 1980 .

[8]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[9]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  The Organization of Marketing Activities: A Contingency Theory of Structure and Performance , 1985 .

[10]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Resource Sharing Among Sbus: Strategic Antecedents and Administrative Implications , 1986 .

[11]  George S. Day,et al.  Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority , 1988 .

[12]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[13]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[14]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications , 1990 .

[15]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[16]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry , 1992 .

[17]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Cooperative Versus Competitive Structures in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms , 1992 .

[18]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[19]  Arvind Parkhe.  “Messy” Research, Methodological Predispositions, and Theory Development in International Joint Ventures , 1993 .

[20]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[21]  John C. Narver,et al.  Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship? , 1994 .

[22]  James M. Sinkula.  Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning , 1994 .

[23]  P. Berliner.  Thinking in Jazz: The Infinite Art of Improvisation , 1995 .

[24]  C. Moorman.  Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes , 1995 .

[25]  B. J. Pine,et al.  Do You Want to Keep Your Customers Forever , 2010 .

[26]  John C. Narver,et al.  Market Orientation and the Learning Organization , 1995 .

[27]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition , 1995 .

[28]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Developing relationships in business networks , 1995 .

[29]  Robert M. Morgan,et al.  The Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, Path Dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions , 1996 .

[30]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Evolution of Intracorporate Domains: Divisional Charter Losses in High-Technology, Multidivisional Corporations , 1996 .

[31]  David J. Collis,et al.  Corporate Strategy: A Resource-Based Approach , 1997 .

[32]  Richard P. Vlosky,et al.  Partnering relationship activities: Building theory from case study research , 1997 .

[33]  C. Perry.  Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing , 1998 .

[34]  Christine Moorman,et al.  The Convergence of Planning and Execution: Improvisation in New Product Development , 1998 .

[35]  Jacques Desrosiers,et al.  The Process of Improvisation , 1998 .

[36]  Christian Homburg,et al.  Marketing's Influence within the Firm , 1999 .

[37]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[38]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  A Framework for Marketing Management , 2000 .

[39]  M.M.Crossan and M.Sorrenti.  Making sense of improvisation , 2003 .

[40]  Rogelio Oliva,et al.  Managing the transition from products to services , 2003, International Journal of Service Industry Management.

[41]  George S. Day,et al.  Aligning the organization with the market , 2006 .