Robotics-Assisted Mirror Rehabilitation Therapy: A Therapist-in-the-Loop Assist-as-Needed Architecture

This paper presents a therapist-in-the-loop framework for robotics-assisted mirror rehabilitation integrated with adaptive assist-as-needed therapy (ANT) that is adjusted based on the impairment level of the patient's affected limb. The framework, which is designed for patients with hemiparesis and/or hemispatial neglect, uses a patient's functional limb as the medium to transfer therapeutic training from the therapist to the patient's impaired limb (PIL). This allows the patient to use his/her functional limb to adjust the desired trajectory generated by the therapist if the trajectory is painful or uncomfortable for the PIL. In order to realize the adaptive patient-targeted therapy, two motor-function assessment metrics, performance symmetry and level of guidance, are proposed, providing real time, task-independent, and objective assessment of the PIL's motor deficiency. An adaptation law is also presented to adjust the intensity of the therapy delivered to the patient in real time and based on the aforementioned estimation of the impairment level of the PIL. Closed-loop system stability has been investigated in the presence of communication delays to facilitate tele/in-home rehabilitation. For this purpose, a combination of the Circle Criterion and the Small-Gain theorem has been applied to account both for communication time delays and the time-varying adaptive ANT. Results of experiments to investigate the performance of the proposed framework are reported.

[1]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke , 2003, Neurology.

[2]  Rajnikant V. Patel,et al.  Networked teleoperation with non-passive environment: Application to tele-rehabilitation , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[3]  Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad,et al.  Operator Dynamics Consideration for Less Conservative Coupled Stability Condition in Bilateral Teleoperation , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[4]  Hermano I Krebs,et al.  Telerehabilitation robotics: bright lights, big future? , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  J. Carr,et al.  Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[6]  Ali Utku Pehlivan,et al.  A Subject-Adaptive Controller for Wrist Robotic Rehabilitation , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[7]  D. Wade,et al.  Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[8]  N. Hogan,et al.  Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  Heidar Ali Talebi,et al.  A novel shared structure for dual user systems with unknown time-delay utilizing adaptive impedance control , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  R. Mayeux,et al.  Hemispatial neglect , 1989, Neurology.

[11]  A. Luft,et al.  Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[12]  C. Burgar,et al.  The MIME robotic system for upper-limb neuro-rehabilitation: results from a clinical trial in subacute stroke , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[13]  J. A. Stevens,et al.  Simulation of Bilateral Movement Training Through Mirror Reflection: A Case Report Demonstrating an Occupational Therapy Technique for Hemiparesis , 2004, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[14]  N. Hogan,et al.  Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Rajni V. Patel,et al.  Novel Cooperative Teleoperation Framework: Multi-Master/Single-Slave System , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[16]  M. Kawato,et al.  Two is better than one: Physical interactions improve motor performance in humans , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Jeffery J. Summers,et al.  Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: A rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke , 2005, Progress in Neurobiology.

[18]  L. Stone,et al.  Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror , 1999, The Lancet.

[19]  Peter Xiaoping Liu,et al.  A Multichannel IOS Small Gain Theorem for Systems With Multiple Time-Varying Communication Delays , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[20]  B. Johansson Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation. The Willis lecture. , 2000, Stroke.

[21]  Mahdi Tavakoli,et al.  Measuring the dynamic impedance of the human arm without a force sensor , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[22]  J. A. Stevens,et al.  Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  Herman van der Kooij,et al.  LIMPACT:A Hydraulically Powered Self-Aligning Upper Limb Exoskeleton , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[24]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[25]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[26]  S L Wolf,et al.  Doing It with Mirrors: A Case Study of a Novel Approach to Neurorehabilitation , 2000, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[27]  S. Hesse,et al.  Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Hyunchul Kim,et al.  Kinematic Data Analysis for Post-Stroke Patients Following Bilateral Versus Unilateral Rehabilitation With an Upper Limb Wearable Robotic System , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[29]  S. Micera,et al.  Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[30]  Jeffery J. Summers,et al.  Bilateral and unilateral movement training on upper limb function in chronic stroke patients: A TMS study , 2007, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[31]  Shahram Payandeh,et al.  A study on design and analysis of virtual fixtures for cutting in training environments , 2005, First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference.

[32]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Therapeutic Robotics: A Technology Push , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[33]  H. Karbe,et al.  Mirror Therapy Promotes Recovery From Severe Hemiparesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[34]  Marion Smits,et al.  The neuronal correlates of mirror therapy: an fMRI study on mirror induced visual illusions in patients with stroke , 2010, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[35]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Sex differences in cortical neuroplasticity in humans , 2006, Neuroreport.

[36]  Lucas R. Nascimento,et al.  Influences of hand dominance on the maintenance of benefits after home-based modified constraint-induced movement therapy in individuals with stroke , 2014, Brazilian journal of physical therapy.

[37]  Debraj Mukherjee,et al.  Epidemiology and the global burden of stroke. , 2011, World neurosurgery.

[38]  Mahdi Tavakoli,et al.  Stability of sampled-data, delayed haptic interaction and teleoperation , 2014, 2014 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS).