Potential applications and limitations of proteomics in the study of neurological disease.

Proteomics represents the comprehensive study of cellular proteins and is aimed at analyzing their structure, function, expression, interactions, and localization in complex biological systems. The information obtained from these types of analyses can contribute to our understanding of the function of individual proteins by identifying proteinprotein interactions and dynamic protein networks found in normal and diseased conditions. Genomic (DNA) or transcriptomic (messenger RNA) approaches alone do not take into account changes in protein stability, localization, and posttranslational modifications that are often critical determinants of protein function and, by extension, cellular behavior. Although proteomic methods still require significant technical advances to provide a truly “global” or “comprehensive” measure of gene expression similar to that achieved by DNA microarrays, recent advances in proteomics are beginning to provide a means to simultaneously characterize the expression of thousands of proteins in a whole cell or biofluid proteome and hundreds of proteins in select subcellular structures or protein complexes. The information obtained from these studies should promote a better understanding of disease conditions,helptherapeuticdecisionmaking,andpotentiallyfostertheidentificationoftherapeutictargets

[1]  A. Whetton,et al.  Relative quantification in proteomics: new approaches for biochemistry. , 2006, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[2]  C. Shriver,et al.  Label-free Semiquantitative Peptide Feature Profiling of Human Breast Cancer and Breast Disease Sera via Two-dimensional Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry*S , 2006, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[3]  L. Ungar,et al.  Identification of potential CSF biomarkers in ALS , 2006, Neurology.

[4]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass Spectrometry and Protein Analysis , 2006, Science.

[5]  Giorgio Valle,et al.  Quantitative Proteomic Comparison of Rat Mitochondria from Muscle, Heart, and Liver *S , 2006, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[6]  S. Grant,et al.  Molecular characterization and comparison of the components and multiprotein complexes in the postsynaptic proteome , 2006, Journal of neurochemistry.

[7]  Vanathi Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Proteomic profiling of cerebrospinal fluid identifies biomarkers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2005, Journal of neurochemistry.

[8]  M. Beal,et al.  Mitochondria take center stage in aging and neurodegeneration , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[9]  M. Mann,et al.  Mass spectrometry–based proteomics turns quantitative , 2005, Nature chemical biology.

[10]  M. Mann,et al.  Exponentially Modified Protein Abundance Index (emPAI) for Estimation of Absolute Protein Amount in Proteomics by the Number of Sequenced Peptides per Protein*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[11]  T. Veenstra,et al.  Investigation of the mouse serum proteome. , 2005, Journal of proteome research.

[12]  Michael G. Katze,et al.  Proteome Analysis of Liver Cells Expressing a Full-Length Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replicon and Biopsy Specimens of Posttransplantation Liver from HCV-Infected Patients , 2005, Journal of Virology.

[13]  Alexandre V. Podtelejnikov,et al.  Proteomic Mapping of Brain Plasma Membrane Proteins*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[14]  Jacques Colinge,et al.  Differential proteomics via probabilistic peptide identification scores. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Analysis of α-Synuclein-associated Proteins by Quantitative Proteomics*[boxs] , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  T. Veenstra,et al.  Global Analysis of the Cortical Neuron Proteome *S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[17]  Bin Ma,et al.  SPIDER: software for protein identification from sequence tags with de novo sequencing error , 2004, Proceedings. 2004 IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference, 2004. CSB 2004..

[18]  Jean-Paul Noben,et al.  Proteomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid from multiple sclerosis patients , 2004, Proteomics.

[19]  S. Hunsucker,et al.  Proteomic analysis of multiple sclerosis cerebrospinal fluid , 2004, Multiple sclerosis.

[20]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Chemical probes and tandem mass spectrometry: a strategy for the quantitative analysis of proteomes and subproteomes. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[21]  Marjan S. Bolouri,et al.  Integrated Analysis of Protein Composition, Tissue Diversity, and Gene Regulation in Mouse Mitochondria , 2003, Cell.

[22]  S. Gygi,et al.  Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  J. Yates,et al.  Method to correlate tandem mass spectra of modified peptides to amino acid sequences in the protein database. , 1995, Analytical chemistry.

[24]  S. Delgado,et al.  Predictors of relapse rate in MS clinical trials , 2008 .

[25]  Yan Liu,et al.  Detection of biomarkers with a multiplex quantitative proteomic platform in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with neurodegenerative disorders. , 2006, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[26]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Quantitative proteomics of cerebrospinal fluid from patients with Alzheimer disease. , 2005, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[27]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Analysis of alpha-synuclein-associated proteins by quantitative proteomics. , 2004, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  Bin Ma,et al.  SPIDER: software for protein identification from sequence tags with de novo sequencing error. , 2004, Proceedings. IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference.

[29]  S. Grant,et al.  The proteomes of neurotransmitter receptor complexes form modular networks with distributed functionality underlying plasticity and behaviour , 2006, Molecular systems biology.