Evidence-based decision-making in infectious diseases epidemiology, prevention and control: matching research questions to study designs and quality appraisal tools

[1]  F. Forland,et al.  087 Capacities, practices and perceptions of evidence-based public health in Europe , 2013, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[2]  T. Woodruff,et al.  Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Published Animal Studies: A Systematic Review , 2013, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[3]  F. Blyth,et al.  Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  Eva A Rehfuess,et al.  Quality appraisal in systematic reviews of public health interventions: an empirical study on the impact of choice of tool on meta-analysis , 2012, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[5]  H. Schünemann,et al.  Report on the 1st international workshop on procedures for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations, Berlin, Germany, 22-23 November 2010. , 2012, Vaccine.

[6]  J. Sterne,et al.  The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  C P Farrington,et al.  Use of the self-controlled case-series method in vaccine safety studies: review and recommendations for best practice , 2011, Epidemiology and Infection.

[8]  D. Moher,et al.  Development quality criteria to evaluate nontherapeutic studies of incidence, prevalence, or risk factors of chronic diseases: pilot study of new checklists. , 2011, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

[9]  R. Kane,et al.  A systematic review of tools used to assess the quality of observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseases. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  Michael Kelly,et al.  Evidence based public health: A review of the experience of the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) of developing public health guidance in England. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[11]  Michele Tarsilla.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[12]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials , 2010, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  D. Howells,et al.  Can Animal Models of Disease Reliably Inform Human Studies? , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[14]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics.

[15]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines , 2009, Allergy.

[16]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Reviewing evidence on complex social interventions: appraising implementation in systematic reviews of the health effects of organisational-level workplace interventions , 2008, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[17]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2007, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[19]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  J. Higgins,et al.  Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. , 2007, International journal of epidemiology.

[21]  David L. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't (reprinted from BMJ, vol 312, pg 71-72, 1996) , 2007 .

[22]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[24]  P. Katrak,et al.  A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools , 2004, BMC medical research methodology.

[25]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  J. Bryce,et al.  Evidence-based public health: moving beyond randomized trials. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[27]  F. Song,et al.  Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. , 2003, Health technology assessment.

[28]  J. Hay,et al.  Examining the Value and Quality of Health Economic Analyses: Implications of Utilizing the QHES , 2003, Journal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP.

[29]  A. Murray,et al.  Developing a quality scoring system for epidemiological surveys of genetic disorders , 2002, Clinical genetics.

[30]  Peter Jüni,et al.  Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality. , 2002, JAMA.

[31]  T. Jefferson,et al.  Quality of systematic reviews of economic evaluations in health care. , 2002, JAMA.

[32]  Timothy C Carey,et al.  Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. , 2002, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[33]  M. Egger,et al.  The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. , 1999, JAMA.

[34]  N. Black,et al.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[35]  Andy Stergachis,et al.  The Role of Cost—Consequence Analysis in Healthcare Decision—Making , 1998, PharmacoEconomics.

[36]  N. Black.  CONSORT , 1996, The Lancet.

[37]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't , 1996, BMJ.

[38]  M. Cho,et al.  Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature. , 1994, JAMA.

[39]  R. Evans.  European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. , 2014, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[40]  P. Tugwell,et al.  The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses , 2014 .

[41]  40026386 Return Undeliverable,et al.  Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health , 2009 .

[42]  QUALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR QUANTITATIVE STUDIES , 2008 .

[43]  P. Prorok,et al.  Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access Comparing Breast Cancer Mortality Rates Before-and-after a Change in Availability of Screening in Different Regions: Extension of the Paired Availability Design , 2022 .

[44]  L W Chambers,et al.  Critical appraisal of the health research literature: prevalence or incidence of a health problem. , 1998, Chronic diseases in Canada.

[45]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .