Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13 722 women

Objectives To describe the effect of multidisciplinary care on survival in women treated for breast cancer. Design Retrospective, comparative, non-randomised, interventional cohort study. Setting NHS hospitals, health boards in the west of Scotland, UK. Participants 14 358 patients diagnosed with symptomatic invasive breast cancer between 1990 and 2000, residing in health board areas in the west of Scotland. 13 722 (95.6%) patients were eligible (excluding 16 diagnoses of inflammatory cancers and 620 diagnoses of breast cancer at death). Intervention In 1995, multidisciplinary team working was introduced in hospitals throughout one health board area (Greater Glasgow; intervention area), but not in other health board areas in the west of Scotland (non-intervention area). Main outcome measures Breast cancer specific mortality and all cause mortality. Results Before the introduction of multidisciplinary care (analysed time period January 1990 to September 1995), breast cancer mortality was 11% higher in the intervention area than in the non-intervention area (hazard ratio adjusted for year of incidence, age at diagnosis, and deprivation, 1.11; 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.20). After multidisciplinary care was introduced (time period October 1995 to December 2000), breast cancer mortality was 18% lower in the intervention area than in the non-intervention area (0.82, 0.74 to 0.91). All cause mortality did not differ significantly between populations in the earlier period, but was 11% lower in the intervention area than in the non-interventional area in the later period (0.89, 0.82 to 0.97). Interrupted time series analyses showed a significant improvement in breast cancer survival in the intervention area in 1996, compared with the expected survival in the same year had the pre-intervention trend continued (P=0.004). This improvement was maintained after the intervention was introduced. Conclusion Introduction of multidisciplinary care was associated with improved survival and reduced variation in survival among hospitals. Further analysis of clinical audit data for multidisciplinary care could identify which aspects of care are most associated with survival benefits.

[1]  R. Wolfe,et al.  Cardiac arrest outcomes before and after the 2005 resuscitation guidelines implementation: evidence of improvement? , 2010, Resuscitation.

[2]  Cath Taylor,et al.  Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Nehmat Houssami,et al.  Breast cancer: multidisciplinary care and clinical outcomes. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[4]  Consensus development conference: treatment of primary breast cancer. , 1986, British medical journal.

[5]  J. Feinglass,et al.  Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  R. Newcombe Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  D. Brewster,et al.  Improvements in survival for women with breast cancer in Scotland between 1987 and 1993: impact of earlier diagnosis and changes in treatment. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[8]  C. Gillis,et al.  Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the west of Scotland , 1996, BMJ.

[9]  F. Bray,et al.  Breast cancer incidence and mortality trends in 16 European countries. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[10]  D. Hole,et al.  Prognostic factors in women with breast cancer: distribution by socioeconomic status and effect on differences in survival , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[11]  B. Asselain,et al.  Management of Operable Invasive Breast Cancer in Women Over the Age of 70: Long-Term Results of a Large-Scale Single-Institution Experience , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  B A Miller,et al.  Recent trends in U.S. breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality rates. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  C. Gillis,et al.  Management of ovarian cancer: referral to a multidisciplinary team matters. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  U. Gunnarsson,et al.  Role of the multidisciplinary team in breast cancer management: results from a large international survey involving 39 countries. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  J. Edwards,et al.  Is the biology of breast cancer changing? A study of hormone receptor status 1984–1986 and 1996–1997 , 2008, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  B. Thürlimann,et al.  The multidisciplinary meeting: An indispensable aid to communication between different specialities. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[17]  P Selby,et al.  Benefits from specialised cancer care , 1996, The Lancet.

[18]  C. McArdle,et al.  An evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary team, in a single centre, on treatment and survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  Anna R. Gagliardi,et al.  Examining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: An international literature review , 2010, Journal of surgical oncology.

[20]  K. Malone,et al.  Incidence of invasive breast cancer by hormone receptor status from 1992 to 1998. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  M. Coleman,et al.  Deprivation and survival from breast cancer. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  C. Gillis,et al.  Specialisation and breast cancer survival in the screening era , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[23]  J. Dewar,et al.  Impact of multidisciplinary team management in head and neck cancer patients , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  D J Spiegelhalter,et al.  Handling over-dispersion of performance indicators , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[25]  N. Meropol,et al.  Trends in Centralization of Cancer Surgery , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[26]  C. Gillis,et al.  Why does specialist treatment of breast cancer improve survival? The role of surgical management , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[27]  V. Carstairs,et al.  Deprivation and health in Scotland. , 1990, Health bulletin.

[28]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Defining menopausal status in epidemiologic studies: A comparison of multiple approaches and their effects on breast cancer rates. , 2010, Maturitas.

[29]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .

[30]  M. Coleman,et al.  Would compliance with cancer care standards improve survival for breast, colorectal and lung cancers? , 2008, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[31]  Mike Clarke,et al.  UK and USA breast cancer deaths down 25% in year 2000 at ages 20–69 years , 2000, The Lancet.

[32]  L. Brinton,et al.  Global trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality 1973-1997. , 2005, International journal of epidemiology.

[33]  T. Lash,et al.  Breast cancer treatment of older women in integrated health care settings. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium , 2006, Cancer.

[35]  Susan Catt,et al.  Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[36]  T. Crosby,et al.  Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer. , 2006, Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

[37]  J. Martín-Moreno,et al.  Analysis of National Cancer Control Programmes in Europe , 2009 .

[38]  R. Carlson,et al.  Interdisciplinary Coordination for Breast Healthcare , 2008 .