If not newly emerging, the subspecialty of neurorehabilitation is definitely burgeoning, and neurology trainees may not be aware of the exciting career opportunities within the field. The contemporary neurology resident is trained in a discipline that has changed dramatically in the last two decades. The modern day neurologist has a slew of treatment options at hand, from r-tPA to multiple immune-modulating medications, and practices with this arsenal of treatments from the emergency room to the outpatient clinic. Despite these advances, many patients still leave the hospital or clinic with debilitating cognitive and sensorimotor impairments and ask what we can do to help them walk or use a hand again or regain enough function to return to their ordinary life activities. Some want advice regarding the prevention of further neurologic deterioration.
The discipline of neurorehabilitation is the field concerned with these reminders of past and present neurologic illness and the improvement of neurologic function. Yet it is not uncommon for many neurology residents to get only a glimpse of this discipline, caught perhaps during a short spinal cord or traumatic brain injury rotation. Beyond the first 72 hours of acute stroke care, most residents will have no interaction with patients to help them swallow, walk, reach and grasp, or manage language and hemineglect disorders. For many residents and practicing neurologists, the team-based approach to therapy characteristic of rehabilitation medicine, and the lack of focus on “localize the lesion” discussions, may seem foreign and fail to inspire a vision of …
[1]
R. Greenwood.
The future of rehabilitation
,
2001,
BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[2]
N. Hogan,et al.
Robotic Technology and Stroke Rehabilitation: Translating Research into Practice
,
2004,
Topics in stroke rehabilitation.
[3]
G. Zeilig,et al.
Professor Heinrich Sebastian Frenkel: a forgotten founder of Rehabilitation Medicine
,
2004,
Spinal Cord.
[4]
R. Greenwood.
THE CLINICAL SCIENCE OF NEUROLOGIC REHABILITATION
,
2004
.
[5]
L. Cohen,et al.
Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke?
,
2006,
The Lancet Neurology.
[6]
G. Dudley,et al.
Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI
,
2006,
Neurology.
[7]
J. P. Miller,et al.
Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial.
,
2006,
JAMA.
[8]
O. Lindvall,et al.
Stem cells for the treatment of neurological disorders
,
2006,
Nature.
[9]
A. Wernig,et al.
Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI
,
2006,
Neurology.
[10]
B. Dobkin.
Brain–computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation
,
2007,
The Journal of physiology.