Verification of multileaf collimator leaf positions using an electronic portal imaging device.

An automated method is presented for determining individual leaf positions of the Siemens dual focus multileaf collimator (MLC) using the Siemens BEAMVIEW(PLUS) electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Leaf positions are computed with an error of 0.6 mm at one standard deviation (sigma) using separate computations of pixel dimensions, image distortion, and radiation center. The pixel dimensions are calculated by superimposing the film image of a graticule with the corresponding EPID image. A spatial correction is used to compensate for the optical distortions of the EPID, reducing the mean distortion from 3.5 pixels (uncorrected) per localized x-ray marker to 2 pixels (1 mm) for a rigid rotation and 1 pixel for a third degree polynomial warp. A correction for a nonuniform dosimetric response across the field of view of the EPID images is not necessary due to the sharp intensity gradients across leaf edges. The radiation center, calculated from the average of the geometric centers of a square field at 0 degrees and 180 degrees collimator angles, is independent of graticule placement error. Its measured location on the EPID image was stable to within 1 pixel based on 3 weeks of repeated extensions/retractions of the EPID. The MLC leaf positions determined from the EPID images agreed to within a pixel of the corresponding values measured using film and ionization chamber. Several edge detection algorithms were tested: contour, Sobel, Roberts, Prewitt, Laplace, morphological, and Canny. These agreed with each other to within < or = 1.2 pixels for the in-air EPID images. Using a test pattern, individual MLC leaves were found to be typically within 1 mm of the corresponding record-and-verify values, with a maximum difference of 1.8 mm, and standard deviations of <0.3 mm in the daily reproducibility. This method presents a fast, automatic, and accurate alternative to using film or a light field for the verification and calibration of the MLC.

[1]  B. Heijmen,et al.  Portal dose measurement in radiotherapy using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  K W Leszczynski,et al.  Verification of radiotherapy treatments: computerized analysis of the size and shape of radiation fields. , 1993, Medical physics.

[3]  Automatic detection of single MLC leaf positions with corrections for penumbral effects and portal imager dose rate characteristics. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  P M Evans,et al.  Image comparison techniques for use with megavoltage imaging systems. , 1992, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  A Fenster,et al.  A digital fluoroscopic imaging device for radiotherapy localization. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Gérard G. Medioni,et al.  Detection of Intensity Changes with Subpixel Accuracy Using Laplacian-Gaussian Masks , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  R A Kirsch,et al.  Computer determination of the constituent structure of biological images. , 1971, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[8]  L Dong,et al.  A portal image alignment and patient setup verification procedure using moments and correlation techniques. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  M C Kirby,et al.  The consequences of fixed-pattern noise and image movement on electronic portal images. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  S M Zhou,et al.  A robust method of multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf-configuration verification. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  B. Fallone,et al.  A robust morphological algorithm for automatic radiation field extraction and correlation of portal images. , 1994, Medical physics.

[12]  M L Mendelsohn,et al.  THE ANALYSIS OF CELL IMAGES * , 1966, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[15]  M van Herk,et al.  Automatic verification of radiation field shape using digital portal images. , 1992, Medical physics.

[16]  M van Herk,et al.  Automatic on-line inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using digital portal images. , 1993, Medical physics.

[17]  T Tate,et al.  Conformation therapy: a method of improving the tumour treatment volume ratio. , 1986, Clinical radiology.

[18]  Y Ge,et al.  An orthogonal moment-based method for automatic verification of radiation field shape. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  I A Cunningham,et al.  Optimal phosphor thickness for portal imaging. , 1997, Medical physics.

[20]  K. Eilertsen,et al.  Methods for fully automated verification of patient set-up in external beam radiotherapy with polygon shaped fields. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  M Partridge,et al.  Independent verification using portal imaging of intensity-modulated beam delivery by the dynamic MLC technique. , 1998, Medical physics.

[22]  E B Podgorsak,et al.  Verification of segmented beam delivery using a commercial electronic portal imaging device. , 1999, Medical physics.