Proper securement of wheelchairs in motor vehicles is vital to providing wheelchair users an adequate level of safety in a crash. Thus far, wheelchair tiedown and occupant restraint systems (WTORS) loading has mostly been examined under frontal impact conditions. Because of the inherent crash dynamic differences, rear-impact loading of WTORS is expected to differ greatly. In this study, three identical, reinforced, manual, folding, X-braced ANSI/RESNA WC19 wheelchairs were subjected to an International Organization for Standardization-proposed rear-impact crash pulse. WTORS loads (front tiedowns, rear tiedowns, lap belt, and shoulder belt) were measured and compared with frontal impact WTORS loading. Rear impact produced substantially higher loads (up to 7,851 N) in the front tiedowns than frontal impact. The rear tiedowns experienced relatively negligible loading (up to 257 N) in rear impact, while rear-impact dynamics caused the lap belt (maximum load of 1,865 N) to be loaded substantially more than the shoulder belt (maximum load of 68 N). Considering differences in frontal and rear impact WTORS loading is important to proper WTORS design and, thus, protection of wheelchair-seated occupants subjected to rear-impact events.
[1]
Roger Frost,et al.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
,
2004
.
[2]
Gina Bertocci,et al.
Characterization of pediatric wheelchair kinematics and wheelchair tiedown and occupant restraint system loading during rear impact.
,
2010,
Medical engineering & physics.
[3]
G E Bertocci,et al.
Development of transportable wheelchair design criteria using computer crash simulation.
,
1996,
IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.
[4]
M. Brault,et al.
Americans With Disabilities: 2005
,
2008
.
[5]
David C. Viano,et al.
Role of the Seat in Rear Crash Safety
,
2002
.