The development and characterization of synthetic minimal yeast promoters

Synthetic promoters, especially minimally sized, are critical for advancing fungal synthetic biology. Fungal promoters often span hundreds of base pairs, nearly ten times the amount of bacterial counterparts. This size limits large-scale synthetic biology efforts in yeasts. Here we address this shortcoming by establishing a methodical workflow necessary to identify robust minimal core elements that can be linked with minimal upstream activating sequences to develop short, yet strong yeast promoters. Through a series of library-based synthesis, analysis and robustness tests, we create a set of non-homologous, purely synthetic, minimal promoters for yeast. These promoters are comprised of short core elements that are generic and interoperable and 10 bp UAS elements that impart strong, constitutive function. Through this methodology, we are able to generate the shortest fungal promoters to date, which can achieve high levels of both inducible and constitutive expression with up to an 80% reduction in size.

[1]  R. Schiestl,et al.  High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[2]  Tom Ellis,et al.  Rational Diversification of a Promoter Providing Fine-Tuned Expression and Orthogonal Regulation for Synthetic Biology , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  Catarina Costa,et al.  The YEASTRACT database: an upgraded information system for the analysis of gene and genomic transcription regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  Vijai Singh,et al.  Recent advancements in synthetic biology: current status and challenges. , 2014, Gene.

[5]  Christopher L. Warren,et al.  A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[6]  Ionas Erb,et al.  Transcription Factor Binding Site Positioning in Yeast: Proximal Promoter Motifs Characterize TATA-Less Promoters , 2011, PloS one.

[7]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Tuning genetic control through promoter engineering. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  A. Dudley,et al.  The Spt components of SAGA facilitate TBP binding to a promoter at a post-activator-binding step in vivo. , 1999, Genes & development.

[9]  V. Iyer,et al.  Poly(dA:dT), a ubiquitous promoter element that stimulates transcription via its intrinsic DNA structure. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[10]  Steven Hahn,et al.  Structure and mechanism of the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[11]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Customized optimization of metabolic pathways by combinatorial transcriptional engineering , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  M. Chang,et al.  Development and characterization of AND‐gate dynamic controllers with a modular synthetic GAL1 core promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  Hal S Alper,et al.  Systematic and evolutionary engineering of a xylose isomerase-based pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient conversion yields , 2014, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[14]  Kathleen A. Curran,et al.  Design of synthetic yeast promoters via tuning of nucleosome architecture , 2014, Nature Communications.

[15]  Eran Segal,et al.  Sequence features of yeast and human core promoters that are predictive of maximal promoter activity , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  S. Hahn,et al.  Site-specific cross-linking of TBP in vivo and in vitro reveals a direct functional interaction with the SAGA subunit Spt3. , 2008, Genes & development.

[17]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Differential Requirement of SAGA Components for Recruitment of TATA-Box-Binding Protein to Promoters In Vivo , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[18]  P. R. Jensen,et al.  The level of glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase activity strongly influences xylose fermentation and inhibitor sensitivity in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains , 2003, Yeast.

[19]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[20]  M. Palumbo,et al.  Extensive role of the general regulatory factors, Abf1 and Rap1, in determining genome-wide chromatin structure in budding yeast , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  Hal S Alper,et al.  Short Synthetic Terminators for Improved Heterologous Gene Expression in Yeast. , 2015, ACS synthetic biology.

[22]  Hal S Alper,et al.  Advances and current limitations in transcript-level control of gene expression. , 2015, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[23]  Rishi Garg,et al.  Controlling promoter strength and regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using synthetic hybrid promoters , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Coordinated induction of multi-gene pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  S. Hahn,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Transcription Factor Regulation and Function, Mechanisms of Initiation, and Roles of Activators and Coactivators , 2011, Genetics.

[26]  Swapnil Bhatia,et al.  Functional optimization of gene clusters by combinatorial design and assembly , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  Alexander J. Stewart,et al.  Why Transcription Factor Binding Sites Are Ten Nucleotides Long , 2012, Genetics.

[28]  Martin S. Taylor,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of mammalian promoter architecture and evolution , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[29]  S. Darst,et al.  Structure of the Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase α Subunit Amino-Terminal Domain , 1998 .

[30]  Lei Xia,et al.  Predicting nucleosome positioning using a duration Hidden Markov Model , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[31]  Z. Yakhini,et al.  Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  Eran Segal,et al.  Manipulating nucleosome disfavoring sequences allows fine-tune regulation of gene expression in yeast , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[33]  Ahmad S. Khalil,et al.  A Synthetic Biology Framework for Programming Eukaryotic Transcription Functions , 2012, Cell.

[34]  Hal S Alper,et al.  Use of expression-enhancing terminators in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increase mRNA half-life and improve gene expression control for metabolic engineering applications. , 2013, Metabolic engineering.

[35]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome , 2004, Nature.

[36]  Eric D. Siggia,et al.  Gene Expression From Random Libraries of Yeast Promoters , 2006, Genetics.

[37]  C. V. Van Slyke,et al.  The essential transcription factor Reb1p interacts with the CLB2 UAS outside of the G2/M control region. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  Pamela A. Silver,et al.  A synthetic circuit for selectively arresting daughter cells to create aging populations , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  D. Bushnell,et al.  Two-Dimensional Crystallography of TFIIB– and IIE–RNA Polymerase II Complexes: Implications for Start Site Selection and Initiation Complex Formation , 1996, Cell.

[40]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Engineering of Promoter Replacement Cassettes for Fine-Tuning of Gene Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[41]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[42]  Kevin Struhl,et al.  Promoters, activator proteins, and the mechanism of transcriptional initiation in yeast , 1987, Cell.

[43]  P. Cramer,et al.  Structural Basis of Transcription: RNA Polymerase II at 2.8 Ångstrom Resolution , 2001, Science.

[44]  Hal S Alper,et al.  The synthetic biology toolbox for tuning gene expression in yeast. , 2014, FEMS yeast research.

[45]  B. Pugh,et al.  Identification and Distinct Regulation of Yeast TATA Box-Containing Genes , 2004, Cell.

[46]  F. Dietrich,et al.  Mapping of transcription start sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using 5′ SAGE , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[47]  K. Verstrepen,et al.  Promoter architecture and the evolvability of gene expression , 2009, Journal of biology.

[48]  K. Struhl,et al.  Activator-mediated recruitment of the RNA polymerase II machinery is the predominant mechanism for transcriptional activation in yeast. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[49]  M. Rosenkrantz,et al.  Distinct upstream activation regions for glucose-repressed and derepressed expression of the yeast citrate synthase gene CIT1 , 1994, Current Genetics.