Monitoring nasal conductance by bilateral nasal cannula pressure transducers

Nasal obstruction is common and may disturb well-being during daytime and sleep. Its objective assessment by standard methods requires patient cooperation and inconvenient instrumentation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop a novel, unobtrusive technique for continuous monitoring of changes in nasal conductance during natural breathing based on pressure recordings at the left and right nares. In ten volunteers, pressure swings derived independently from left and right nasal cannula were recorded at baseline, and after topical application of histamine and xylomethazoline. Nasal conductance was measured by means of epipharyngeal pressure recordings and face-mask pneumotachography as the reference standard. Decreases in nasal conductance were associated with changes in relative timing and shape of left and right nasal cannula derived pressure swings during breathing. This was reflected in decreases in the coefficient of cross-correlation between left and right nasal pressure signals. Diagnostic accuracy in detecting a fall in nasal conductance to <80% baseline by the maximal coefficient of determination from cross-correlation of left versus right nasal pressure was evaluated by receiver operator characteristics. The area under the curve was 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 0.99, n = 40, P < 0.05 versus 0.5. We conclude that patterns of pressure swings derived from left and right nasal cannula may serve as a noninvasive means to detect changes in nasal conductance without requirement of patient cooperation.

[1]  K. Bloch,et al.  Accuracy of nasal cannula pressure recordings for assessment of ventilation during sleep. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[2]  T. Young,et al.  Chronic nasal congestion at night is a risk factor for snoring in a population-based cohort study. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  F Lofaso,et al.  Nasal obstruction as a risk factor for sleep apnoea syndrome. , 2000, The European respiratory journal.

[4]  J. Wheatley,et al.  Nasal airflow dynamics: mechanisms and responses associated with an external nasal dilator strip. , 2000, The European respiratory journal.

[5]  R. Eccles,et al.  Nasal Airflow in Health and Disease , 2000, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[6]  T. Young,et al.  Nasal obstruction as a risk factor for sleep-disordered breathing. The University of Wisconsin Sleep and Respiratory Research Group. , 1997, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[7]  C. Naspitz,et al.  Diagnostic value of nasal provocation testing and rhinomanometry in allergic rhinitis. , 1996, Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology.

[8]  M. Ohki,et al.  Anterior and posterior rhinomanometry. , 1989, Rhinology.

[9]  P. Cole Stability of nasal airflow resistance. , 1989, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[10]  J. Haight,et al.  Posture and the Nasal Cycle , 1986, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[11]  M J Tobin,et al.  Separation of factors responsible for change in breathing pattern induced by instrumentation. , 1985, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  Clément Pa Committee report on standardization of rhinomanometry. , 1984 .

[13]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[14]  D. Navajas,et al.  Evaluation of nasal prongs for estimating nasal flow. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[15]  O Hilberg,et al.  Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection. , 1989, Journal of applied physiology.