Judgment processes in motivation: Anchoring and adjustment effects on judgment and behavior.

Abstract The behavioral correlates of human judgment have received little attention from judgment and decision making researchers. One behavioral domain that provides for the study of judgment-behavior relations is task motivation (i.e., the allocation of time and effort to a task). Judgments of contingent relations are primary components of several theories of motivation, including expectancy theories and the theory of behavior in organizations proposed by Naylor, Pritchard, and Ilgen (1980) . The characteristics of heuristic judgment processes are hypothesized to affect contingency judgments and thus behavioral allocations of time and effort. This paper examines the effects of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic upon (a) judgments of future effort and performance and (b) upon actual allocations of time and effort using several types of anchoring information. Results indicate that both irrelevant and relevant information have strong anchoring effects on effort and performance judgments, but do not have concomitant effects on behavior. Implications for the role of judgment in motivation and for the link between judgment and behavior are discussed.

[1]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[2]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[3]  Naveed Gilani,et al.  Information search in judgment tasks: A regression model and some preliminary findings , 1982 .

[4]  James Shanteau,et al.  Reducing the influence of irrelevant information on experienced decision makers , 1984 .

[5]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Conservatism in human information processing , 1982 .

[6]  D. Cervone,et al.  Anchoring, Efficacy and Action: The Influence of Judgmental Heuristics on Self-Efficacy Judgments a , 1986 .

[7]  R. Hogarth.  Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics. , 1981 .

[8]  J. A. Sniezek,et al.  Prediction with single event versus aggregate data , 1988 .

[9]  J. A. Sniezek.  The role of variable labels in cue probability learning tasks , 1986 .

[10]  B. S. Georgopoulos,et al.  A path-goal approach to productivity. , 1957 .

[11]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  Expectancy theory measures: An empirical comparison in an experimental simulation. , 1981 .

[12]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[13]  M. Taylor,et al.  Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. , 1979 .

[14]  William F. Wright,et al.  Effects of situation familiarity and financial incentives on use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic for probability assessment , 1989 .

[15]  L. Cohen.  Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated? , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  Terence Connolly,et al.  Information search in judgment tasks: The effects of unequal cue validity and cost , 1984 .

[17]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  An Anchoring and Adjustment Model of Spousal Predictions , 1986 .

[18]  W. Edwards,et al.  Emerging technologies for making decisions , 1965 .

[19]  R. Koestner,et al.  Anchoring in the detection of deception and leakage. , 1984 .

[20]  C. Peterson,et al.  A primacy effect in subjective probability revision. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  M. A. Campion,et al.  A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process , 1982 .

[22]  J. Baron,et al.  An analysis of the word-superiority effect☆ , 1973 .

[23]  George A. Quattrone.  Overattribution and unit formation: When behavior engulfs the person. , 1982 .

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[25]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  For Those Condemned to Study the Past: Reflections on Historical Judgment , 1980 .

[26]  Don N. Kleinmuntz,et al.  Cognitive Heuristics and Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Environment , 1985 .

[27]  A. Tversky,et al.  The simulation heuristic , 1982 .

[28]  T. Connolly.  Some Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Expectancy Models of Work Performance Motivation , 1976 .

[29]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.