Towards a pattern science for the Semantic Web

With the web of data, the semantic web can be an empirical science. Two problems have to be dealt with. The knowledge soup problem is about semantic heterogeneity, and can be considered a difficult technical issue, which needs appropriate transformation and inferential pipelines that can help making sense of the different knowledge contexts. The knowledge boundary problem is at the core of empirical investigation over the semantic web: what are the meaningful units that constitute the research objects for the semantic web? This question touches many aspects of semantic web studies: data, schemata, representation and reasoning, interaction, linguistic grounding, etc.

[1]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge" in the psychology of computer vision , 1975 .

[2]  John B. Lowe,et al.  The Berkeley FrameNet Project , 1998, ACL.

[3]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  S. Griffis.  EDITOR , 1997, Journal of Navigation.

[5]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Frame Detection over the Semantic Web , 2009, ESWC.

[7]  Gerard P. Smith.  Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, A life in the laboratory Jay Schulkin. Churchill Livingstone (2005), Cost US$49.95, ISBN: 0-8018-8073-4 , 2005 .

[8]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Congruent Embodied Representations for Visually Presented Actions and Linguistic Phrases Describing Actions , 2006, Current Biology.

[9]  J. Sowa.  The challenge of knowledge soup , 2006 .

[10]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Ontology and the Lexicon: What's in a schema? , 2010 .

[11]  Current Biology , 2012, Current Biology.

[12]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[13]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Linked Data Is Merely More Data , 2010, AAAI Spring Symposium: Linked Data Meets Artificial Intelligence.

[14]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[15]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[16]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  The Role of Competency Questions in Enterprise Engineering , 1995 .

[17]  U. Grenander.  Elements of Pattern Theory , 1996 .

[18]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Experimenting with eXtreme Design , 2010, EKAW.

[19]  Bruce W. Porter,et al.  Knowledge Patterns , 2000, Handbook on Ontologies.

[20]  A. Sheth.  International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems , .

[21]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Norms and plans as unification criteria for social collectives , 2008, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[22]  Peter Clark,et al.  Building Concept Representations from Reusable Components , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[23]  I. Biederman,et al.  Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Thomas Metzinger,et al.  Motor ontology: the representational reality of goals, actions and selves , 2003 .

[25]  Eric Yu,et al.  Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling , 2002 .

[26]  Carl Vogel,et al.  Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics , 1996, COLING 1996.

[27]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Content Ontology Design Patterns as Practical Building Blocks for Web Ontologies , 2008, ER.

[28]  J. Piaget.  Six Psychological Studies , 1967 .

[29]  Ralph Johnson,et al.  design patterns elements of reusable object oriented software , 2019 .

[30]  Christian Lebiere,et al.  Behavioral and Brain Sciences Cognitive Architectures Combine Formal and Heuristic Approaches Powered by Editorial Manager® and Preprint Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation , 2012 .

[31]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Understanding the Semantic Web through Descriptions and Situations , 2003, OTM.