Seismic response of sliding equipment and contents in base‐isolated buildings subjected to broadband ground motions

Base isolation has been established as the seismic design approach of choice when it comes to protecting nonstructural contents. However, while this protection technology has been widely shown to reduce seismic demands on attached oscillatory equipment and contents (EC), its effectiveness in controlling the response of freestanding EC that are prone to sliding has not been investigated. This study examines the seismic behavior of sliding EC inside base-isolated buildings subjected to broadband ground motions. The effect of isolation system properties on the response of sliding EC with various friction coefficients is examined. Two widely used isolation models are considered: viscously damped linear elastic and bilinear. The study finds isolation to be generally effective in reducing seismic demands on sliding EC, but it also exposes certain situations where isolation in fact increases demands on EC, most notably for low friction coefficients and high earthquake intensities. Damping at the isolation level is effective in controlling the EC sliding displacements, although damping over about 20% is found to be superfluous. The study identifies a physically motivated dimensionless intensity measure and engineering demand parameter for sliding equipment in base-isolated buildings subjected to broadband ground motions. Finally, the paper presents easy-to-use design fragility curves and an example that illustrates how to use them. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Mary C. Comerio,et al.  Laboratory Equipment: Estimating Losses and Mitigation Costs , 2003 .

[2]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Seismic response analysis of multidrum classical columns , 2005 .

[3]  Tatjana Isaković,et al.  Floor response spectra in isolated structures subjected to earthquakes weaker than the design earthquake—Part I: Isolation with high-damping rubber bearings , 2011 .

[4]  N. Null.  Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 2003 .

[5]  Samit Ray Chaudhuri,et al.  Bench–shelf system dynamic characteristics and their effects on equipment and contents , 2006 .

[6]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Experimental and analytical studies on the response of 1/4-scale models of freestanding laboratory equipment subjected to strong earthquake shaking , 2010 .

[7]  Shahram Taghavi,et al.  Response assessment of nonstructural building elements , 2003 .

[8]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Full‐scale shaking table test of a base‐isolated medical facility subjected to vertical motions , 2013 .

[9]  Božidar Stojadinović,et al.  Dynamics of inelastic base‐isolated structures subjected to analytical pulse ground motions , 2013 .

[10]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Approximating peak responses in seismically isolated buildings using generalized modal analysis , 2013 .

[11]  Brian J. Meacham,et al.  Overview of the Building Nonstructural Components and Systems (BNCS) Project , 2013 .

[12]  G. D. Manolis,et al.  Experimental Study of Secondary Systems in Base-Isolated Structure , 1992 .

[13]  T. Soong,et al.  Sliding fragility of block‐type non‐structural components. Part 1: Unrestrained components , 2003 .

[14]  Samit Ray Chaudhuri,et al.  Fragility of Bench-Mounted Equipment Considering Uncertain Parameters , 2006 .

[15]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Experimental and analytical studies on the response of freestanding laboratory equipment to earthquake shaking , 2009 .

[16]  Nicos Makris,et al.  The rocking spectrum and the limitations of practical design methodologies , 2003 .

[17]  C. Kircher.  IT MAKES DOLLARS AND SENSE TO IMPROVE NONSTRUCTURAL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE , 2003 .

[18]  Dimitrios Konstantinidis,et al.  Mechanics of Rubber Bearings for Seismic and Vibration Isolation , 2011 .

[19]  Andreas Schellenberg,et al.  Structural analysis and application of wind loads to solar arrays , 2013 .

[20]  Richard L. Scheaffer,et al.  Probability and statistics for engineers , 1986 .

[21]  Franklin M. Fisher,et al.  A Note on Estimation from a Cauchy Sample , 1964 .

[22]  Harry W. Shenton,et al.  CRITERIA FOR INITIATION OF SLIDE, ROCK, AND SLIDE-RoCK RIGID-BODY MODES , 1996 .

[23]  A. Veletsos,et al.  Effect of Inelastic Behavior on the Response of Simple Systems to Earthquake Motions , 1975 .

[24]  Jiahao Lin,et al.  An Introduction to Seismic Isolation , 1993 .

[25]  Ioannis Politopoulos,et al.  A review of adverse effects of damping in seismic isolation , 2008 .

[26]  Atsuo Kakehi,et al.  Full‐scale shaking table test for examination of safety and functionality of base‐isolated medical facilities , 2011 .

[27]  Ruben L. Boroschek.  Seismic vulnerability of the healthcare system in El Salvador and recovery after the 2001 earthquakes , 2004 .

[28]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Behavior of nonstructural components in recent earthquakes. , 2011 .

[29]  Daniel M. Fenz.  Development, implementation and verification of dynamic analysis models for multi-spherical sliding bearings , 2008 .

[30]  D. Bloch,et al.  A Note on the Estimation of the Location Parameter of the Cauchy Distribution , 1966 .

[31]  Keri L. Ryan,et al.  Aspects of Isolation Device Behavior Observed from Full-Scale Testing of an Isolated Building at E-Defense , 2012 .

[32]  Dimitrios Konstantinidis,et al.  The Influence of Isolator Hysteresis on Equipment Performance in Seismic Isolated Buildings , 2010 .

[33]  P. Prescott.  Selection of Trimming Proportions for Robust Adaptive Trimmed Means , 1978 .

[34]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  PEER Testbed Study on a Laboratory Building: Exercising Seismic Performance Assessment , 2005 .

[35]  Masahiro Kurata,et al.  Disorder and damage of base‐isolated medical facilities when subjected to near‐fault and long‐period ground motions , 2014 .

[36]  J. Penzien,et al.  Rocking response of rigid blocks to earthquakes , 1980 .

[37]  Keri L. Ryan,et al.  Computational Simulation of a Full-Scale, Fixed-Base, and Isolated-Base Steel Moment Frame Building Tested at E-Defense , 2014 .

[38]  Tara C. Hutchinson,et al.  Characterizing frictional behavior for use in predicting the seismic response of unattached equipment , 2005 .

[39]  G. Housner.  The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes , 1963 .

[40]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[41]  Byounghoan Choi,et al.  Estimating Sliding Displacement of an Unanchored Body Subjected to Earthquake Excitation , 2002 .

[42]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[43]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Sliding fragility of block‐type non‐structural components. Part 2: Restrained components , 2003 .

[44]  James M. Kelly,et al.  The role of damping in seismic isolation , 1999 .

[45]  Robert E. Bachman,et al.  Creating Fragility Functions for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering , 2007 .

[46]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Dimensional Analysis of Rigid-Plastic and Elastoplastic Structures under Pulse-Type Excitations , 2004 .

[47]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Seismic response of light internal equipment in base‐isolated structures , 1985 .

[48]  N. Newmark.  Effects of Earthquakes on Dams and Embankments , 1965 .

[49]  Yuan Shao,et al.  Seismic Response of Unanchored Bodies , 1999 .

[50]  R. Scheaffer,et al.  Probability and statistics for engineers , 1986 .