Validation of a Portuguese version of the Groningen radiotherapy-induced xerostomia questionnaire

Background The aim of this study was to validate and determine at pretest level the reliability of the Portuguese version of the Groningen radiotherapy-induced xerostomia questionnaire. Material and Methods This study employed 37 head and neck cancer patients. Each patient signed an informed consent and responded to the Portuguese version of the questionnaire in the form of an interview. This was repeated again after 2 weeks. A standard single question provided a validity check. Data were analyzed using Cronbach’s α to test its reliability and total and interitem correlation, and intraclass correlation to determine its internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Construct validity supported by objective measurements as salivary secretion was also investigated. Significance was set at .05. Results Cronbach’s α was 0.91 and 0.89 for the first and second test administrations, respectively, which indicates that the internal consistency was excellent. The intraclass correlation coefficient value for the test-retest reliability was 0.70. The correlation between the total score of the questionnaire and standard single dry mouth question was 0.72 for the first round, indicating a good correlation. Conclusions Demonstrating very good psychometric properties, the Portuguese version of the Groningen radiotherapy-induced xerostomia questionnaire is a valid tool and can be considered a reliable instrument to measure xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients. Key words:Xerostomia, quality of life, xerostomia questionnaire, transcultural validation, head and neck cancer, radiotherapy, saliva.

[1]  C. Mathers,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[2]  Duarte Nuno da Silva Marques,et al.  Translation, validation, and construct reliability of a Portuguese version of the Xerostomia Inventory. , 2012, Oral diseases.

[3]  Duarte Nuno da Silva Marques,et al.  Effects of gustatory stimulants of salivary secretion on salivary pH and flow in patients with Sjögren's syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. , 2011, Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology.

[4]  Valmi D Sousa,et al.  Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. , 2011, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[5]  Lynne M Connelly,et al.  Cronbach's alpha. , 2011, Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses.

[6]  A. D. Caballero,et al.  Oral sequelae of head and neck radiotherapy , 2011 .

[7]  A. Vissink,et al.  The Groningen Radiotherapy-Induced Xerostomia questionnaire: development and validation of a new questionnaire. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  A. Vissink,et al.  A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: prevalence, severity and impact on quality of life , 2010, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[9]  Duarte Nuno da Silva Marques,et al.  Effects of gustatory stimulants of salivary secretion on salivary pH and flow: a randomized controlled trial. , 2009, Oral diseases.

[10]  A. Dietz,et al.  Validation of the EORTC QLQ‐C30 and EORTC QLQ‐H&N35 in patients with laryngeal cancer after surgery , 2009, Head & neck.

[11]  S. Rogers,et al.  A structured review and theme analysis of papers published on 'quality of life' in head and neck cancer: 2000-2005. , 2007, Oral oncology.

[12]  C. Grau,et al.  Patient assessed symptoms are poor predictors of objective findings. Results from a cross sectional study in patients treated with radiotherapy for pharyngeal cancer , 2007, Acta oncologica.

[13]  Avraham Eisbruch,et al.  Grading xerostomia by physicians or by patients after intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  C. McHorney,et al.  Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? , 1995, Quality of Life Research.

[15]  N. Aaronson,et al.  Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life , 1993, Quality of Life Research.

[16]  D. Brizel,et al.  How should we measure and report radiotherapy-induced xerostomia? , 2003, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[17]  D. Streiner Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency , 2003, Journal of personality assessment.

[18]  P. Levendag,et al.  Patients with head and neck cancer cured by radiation therapy: A survey of the dry mouth syndrome in long‐term survivors , 2002, Head & neck.

[19]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. , 2000, Spine.

[20]  P. Fayers,et al.  A 12 country field study of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the head and neck cancer specific module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) in head and neck patients. EORTC Quality of Life Group. , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[21]  W. Thomson,et al.  Further testing of the xerostomia inventory. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[22]  Sheila M. Williams,et al.  The Xerostomia Inventory: a multi-item approach to measuring dry mouth. , 1999, Community dental health.

[23]  P. Fayers,et al.  Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  D. Watson,et al.  Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development , 1995 .

[25]  J. Cooper,et al.  Late effects of radiation therapy in the head and neck region. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  S. Ferketich,et al.  Focus on psychometrics. Aspects of item analysis. , 1991, Research in nursing & health.

[27]  C. Dawes Circadian rhythms in the flow rate and composition of unstimulated and stimulated human submandibular saliva. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  C. Dawes,et al.  Circadian rhythms in the concentrations of protein and the main electrolytes in human unstimulated parotid saliva. , 1973, Archives of oral biology.